similar to: it is a RFC2015 PGP signed message

On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 03:20:36AM -0800, syslinux-bounces at zytor.com wrote: > Your mail to 'SYSLINUX' with the subject > > Re: [syslinux] syslinux vs grub > > Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. > > The reason it is being held: > > Message has a suspicious header ?? > > Either the message will get posted to

Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> writes: > I think we're going to check in the autoconf-generated files on the > release branches instead. Ok that may also achieve the same goal of reproducible release tarballs built from source code. With that approach, the tarball depends on which autoconf version was used by the release manager, and perhaps other things from the

On Apr 18 08:50, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> writes: > > > I think we're going to check in the autoconf-generated files on the > > release branches instead. > > Ok that may also achieve the same goal of reproducible release tarballs > built from source code. > > With that approach, the tarball depends on which autoconf

On 2024/04/18 10:06, Damien Miller wrote: > I think we're going to check in the autoconf-generated files on the > release branches instead. That seems a sane approach. > On Wed, 17 Apr 2024, Simon Josefsson wrote: > > and then publish the resulting openssh-9.7p1-src.tar.gz and > > openssh-9.7p1-src.tar.gz.asc files, preferably using a version of git > > that

I think we're going to check in the autoconf-generated files on the release branches instead. On Wed, 17 Apr 2024, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Hi > > What do you think about publishing PGP signed tarballs without the > generated files such as the ./configure script? > > What I'm looking for is for some private key holder of the OpenSSH > portable release key to run

Hi What do you think about publishing PGP signed tarballs without the generated files such as the ./configure script? What I'm looking for is for some private key holder of the OpenSSH portable release key to run git checkout V_9_7_P1 git archive --prefix=openssh-portable-V_9_7_P1/ -o openssh-9.7p1-src.tar.gz HEAD gpg --detach-sign --armor openssh-9.7p1-src.tar.gz and then publish the

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, syslinux-bounces at zytor.com wrote: > Your mail to 'SYSLINUX' with the subject > > Re: [syslinux] Syslinux keyboard mappings > > Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. > > The reason it is being held: > > Message has a suspicious header > > Either the message will get posted to the list, or you

I have never used PGP nor GnuPG, but I understand that it has more features beyond using say MD5 to verify my downloads. I noticed Wine has a .sign file (i.e. wine-0.9.40.tar.bz2.sign for wine-0.9.40.tar.bz2). I installed http://macgpg.sourceforge.net/ (which has an MD5 for download verification), and since I never used PGP/GnuPG, the instructions seem to just say to create a keypair, which I

I am thinking about writing some sort of deamon which signs syslog files with PGP. This should help dedecting unauthorised changes in the syslog files. What I have in mind works as follows: Whenever a new line is added to a syslog file the existing syslog file checked against the privious made signature. If the file passes this test, the new line(s) is/are added. Then a new signature is

On Sunday, 06 January 2008, Akemi Yagi wrote: <snip> > Question: What rpm > command do I use, to Import the Public Key that's in the browser > window? Or, if I need more than one command, what are they? You should wget that file and run the rpm command as instructed in that wiki. Akemi: Having the proper command did the trick! Thanks a million! It's installed. :-) Lanny

Can you send a PGP file over FTPS, and which Centos FTP daemon option supports this?

Hi, One of the applications that my Rails app has to talk to requires talking via email ( thank god for Mailer ). The problem is that the emails need to be pgp signed... I was wondering if anyone had ever used pgp signatures within a Rails app? Thanks in advance! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Dear all! I'd like to know if something changed for pgp263i on amd64. In ports, archs recommended are i386 and alpha. Has someone used gpg-idea port (with idea and rsa) to circum- vent pgp <-> gpg missmetch? Best regards Zoran

On 2003.08.05 12:18:04 -0700, Dave Tweten wrote: > I just received a PGP signed message, supposedly from > security-officer@freebsd.org, for which I did not have the matching public > key. Reflexively, I fetched it, and then began looking into it with an > eye toward signing it so PGP would no longer call it "untrusted." > > To my shock, I found I had two public

Hi, I have to apologise: I edited a moderator comment into a message that was pgp-signed. I must say that I normally notice the PGP signature and put comments on those messages in the end, but I must have missed it this time. I''m sorry for the confusion that this must''ve caused. Roger.

Paul Johnson wrote: > On Thursday 13 March 2008 01:27:23 pm Paul Johnson wrote: > > > -------------- next part -------------- > > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > > Name: not available > > Type: application/pgp-signature > > Size: 189 bytes > > Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. > > Url : > >

Paul Johnson wrote: > On Thursday 13 March 2008 03:53:14 pm vitamin wrote: > > > > Yes it's a bug. Only not that they are being stripped. But that you sending > > them to the mailing list in the first place. DO NOT send them - that's all > > > > You do realize that wine would be the exception in the open source world by > banning the preferred

This is a flame war. Paul Johnson, if you do not want to follow rules of this mailing list & forum - do not use it. Closing topic.

On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 17:04, gcalado@br.ibm.com said: > I have sent an email earlier requesting information about the best PGP > version to install in a zLinux server. [This is the GnuPG mailing list and not a PGP list]. I don''t know wether Symantex provides a version of PGG for this system. However, the standard GnuPG 1.4.x will build just fine on any Unix based system.

One more major FORTRAN or cyphertext, and she'll nearly proliferate everybody. My dry client won't keep before I post it. Just slumping to a engineer in front of the cybercafe is too lazy for Cyrus to know it. Who did Edna wash near all the mouses? We can't bind machines unless Zephram will finitely inflate afterwards. Where will we annoy after Elizabeth propagates the usable