similar to: Samba ACL and '+' on a 'ls - l'

Hi Guys! A simple question.. I never worked with ACL's and since my costumer want some access levels for some sub-foldes in shares, I am reading some manuals about that.. But.. Before apply some testings, I need some advices about this.. Here is my question... Parent folder (share): FOLDER Sub-folder1: PROJETC1 Sub-folder2: PROJECT2 User1: DIRECTOR Group: Director/Projects User2: Employee1

Hi All. Greetings from South Africa. I have a Samba LDAP server (v 3.022) running on Ubuntu 6.10 Its serving about 200 users, with profiles, and domain logons. I want to start server MS Access Databases on it, with the best speed performance as possible. At the moment, the back ends for these databases, are about 200+ MB, and will grow over the next few years. Basically, the share should

On btrfs, do the following ------------------ # su user1 # cd btrfs-part/ # touch aaa # getfacl aaa # file: aaa # owner: user1 # group: user1 user::rw- group::rw- other::r-- # su user2 # cd btrfs-part/ # setfacl -m u::rwx aaa # getfacl aaa # file: aaa # owner: user1 # group: user1 user::rwx <- successed to setfacl group::rw- other::r-- ------------------ but we

I have a great understanding problem about acls and share-definitions. I use Samba 3.0.1pre3, compiled with acl-support, everything works fine, ACL's can be set with Windows XP File-Manager and the getfacl shows that it is OK. My Problem ist that I dont know how to define a share for acls. For example, here is my share [user1] Path=/lanman/user1 Valid users=user1,@root Force user=user1 Read

hey list, we are currently migrating our users from novell to samba. now we have one problem: in novell we could give e.g. user1 access to users2 home share so he could modify, delete or add files on this share. in samba we defined a global homes share that is mapped on logon. so how can we give user1 the needed rights? here is the definition of the homes share in smb.conf: [homes]

I can't seem to verify whether or my first attempt at sending this message was successful, so I'm reposting it, using a different method. I apologize if anyone has seen it already. I have a Samba server, joined to my Windows Active Directory domain, and I'm having a problem setting ACLs on a share from Windows. On Windows, I get the error message "Unable to save permission

Dear All. I have a file server. I installed the samba on it to store the document. See below for the security : - group : + g1 : user1, user2,user3 + g2 : user4, user5,user6 + g3 : user1,user5 - folder : + folder A : set permission chmod 775 and group chown root:g3 The problem is when the user1 modified a file in folder A then that file add the group g1 automatically. So

Hello, I'm Oliver and I need help for a experiment. I have a sharing with Samba version 3.2.5, my distribution Linux is Debian(Lenny) and the acl version is 2.2.47. Below my configurations files: #/etc/fstab /dev/sda3 /shared reiserfs defaults,acl 0 1 #smb.conf [data] comment = files path = /shared inherit acls = yes inherit permissions = yes map acl inherit = Yes #

I have an issue with samba+acl and Windows checkbox "Replace all Child object permissions" . I have a folder with defaults ACLs : /default:user:user1:rwx, default:user:user2:rwx owned by user1/ On Windows if I'm checking "Replace all Child object permissions with inheritable permissions from this object" on this folder, it losts the default ACL

I have a user who was having problem accessing samba. So I suggested him to try to login from other system to see if it's problem with his pc or his account. Then he found that when he used other person's PC, it didn't ask for password at all and gave full access to his account! The two person's accounts are totally different. Any idea? Thanks. --

I have a samba share (using Samba 3.6.3) running on an ext4 filesystem with the "acl" mount option. The samba share is configured as follows: [myshare] path = /srv/myshare browseable = no public = no guest ok = no writable = yes printable = no create mode = 0660 directory mode = 0770 level2 oplocks = no oplocks = no I have configured the following ACLs on

Hi, I running samba-3.0.13-1 connect to W2k3, attr-2.4.19 and acl-2.2.27-1. I've a strange problem with ACL settings, following the data structure.I would that user1 could read/write only his personal folder, user1 belongs to domain users and can reach the user folder but he can't see his personal folder. I have tried to run setfacl -b (remove all ACL entries) and setup them again, format

Hi, I think I found a bug in Dovecot 2.1.17 and 2.2.13. In our setup, sometimes ACLs stop working because "dovecot-acl-list" is replaced by an empty file. We found that lazy_expunge is connected to this. To reproduce, create ACLs for "user1" in a folder. Put a mail in that folder and expunge it, so that the folder will be created in the "expunged" namespace.

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Dear Rowland, I changed smb.conf as its tip. I had already read about the ACL's Windows and Posix. Even changing the smb.conf and using the ACL methods, I still do not write access to the folder. Example: # mkdir /mnt/data/teste1 # ls -all /mnt/data/teste1 total 12 drwxrws---+ 2 administrator domain admins 6 Out 25 10:05 . drwxrwxr-x+ 10 root domain admins 4096 Out 25

hello, I'm using dovecot 2.0.16 and i would like to use acl for subfolder. The file dovecot-acl is well written in both folder test and the subfolder test/Test : cat /home/user2/Maildir/.test.Test/dovecot-acl user=user1 ilrws cat /home/user2/Maildir/.test/dovecot-acl user=user1 ilprws When user1 want to list, the folder test is well shown, but not the subfolder test/Test. This is the

Inside a single directory, I have 2 subdirectories: dirname=working (root.root rwsrwsr-x) user::rwx group::rwx user:user1:rwx group:group1:rwx default:user::rwx default:group::rwx default:user:user1:rwx default:group:group1:rwx dirname=controlled (root.root rwsrwsr-x) user::rwx group::rwx group:group2:rwx default:group:group2:rwx default:user::rwx default:group::rwx The idea being that files

woudln't work because all the users are in one group anyway. and i am not allowed to to give read rights do "any" (i.e. 755) but theres really no option in smb.conf like "read only users = " or something like that? Am 13.12.2011 17:56, schrieb Raffael Sahli: > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:38:41 +0100, "skull"<skull17 at gmx.ch> wrote: >> I want to

On 11/06/19 11:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 11/06/2019 10:34, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >> I've just upgraded a Samba AD server to 4.10.2 a few weeks ago from >> 4.x (I'm afraid I'm not sure the exact earlier version) - and since >> then I just haven't managed to pin down the file permissions and >> inheritance on the shares as

I've just upgraded a Samba AD server to 4.10.2 a few weeks ago from 4.x (I'm afraid I'm not sure the exact earlier version) - and since then I just haven't managed to pin down the file permissions and inheritance on the shares as it's been constantly causing issues. This server is both a file server and a AD DC. The current problem I am facing is the permissions of the