similar to: Re: Load Balancing

Can you explain me why I 'm obnoxious cretin ? I 've been asking for monitoring the digium cards via snmp. What's the problem ? I post to asterisk-users and asterisk-dev to get informations why some people of these list insult me ? What are yours problems ? Plesae to send me back my "cretin" mails > I think there should be a regular lists award for > obnoxious

Can you explain me why I 'm obnoxious cretin ? I 've been asking for monitoring the digium cards via snmp. What's the problem ? I post to asterisk-users and asterisk-dev to get informations why some people of these list insult me ? What are yours problems ? Plesae to send me back my "cretin" mails > I think there should be a regular lists award for > obnoxious

I'm having trouble getting the echo canceller to work and I'm hoping some one can get me started in diagnosing what's going on. The symptoms I'm seeing are these: 1. If the NES is silence (i.e., no echo, no speech), the ec puts the FES back into the audio. 2. If the NES is similar to the FES (same speech words), the ec doesn't seem to remove the echo. 3. For case #2, I pushed

Jean-Marc, That was my first thought as well. However, I double checked everything and it wasn't reversed. I also reversed it to see what would happen. In that case, the NES came out unchanged. (This NES was the original FES.) Any other ideas? Also, do you know what algorithm is used? - Eric Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Marc Valin

Jean-Marc, BTW, the problem #1 is not unique to the speex echo canceller. It has also occurred on other ec's I've tried, most recently the CANEC ec from dspalgorithms.com. - Eric Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Scott > Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 9:11 AM > To: 'Jean-Marc Valin' > Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org > Subject: RE: [Speex-dev] Problems

On Feb 25, 2011, at 5:23 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 24 February 2011 21:34, Jason Kim <jasonwkim at google.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > > It simplified a bit type construction but the overall code did not > reduce that much. The old interface expected FEs to keep track of everything, where as new

Dear list, dear Cecilia and Daniel, sorry for coming in ten days late, I've been very busy lately so I came across this email only today. This is just to make some points clearer re: fixed effects and r2 in package 'plm', to both you and the list. In particular, to make you aware of some additional features. Please see my comments below, with '##'. Best, Giovanni

Remarque : message transf?r? en pi?ce jointe. Hello , To people who told me I'm cretin !! Harry ___________________________________________________________________________ Faites de Yahoo! votre page d'accueil sur le web pour retrouver directement vos services pr?f?r?s : v?rifiez vos nouveaux mails, lancez vos recherches et suivez l'actualit? en temps r?el. Rendez-vous

With reference to R News News: R version 3.0.0 (Masked Marvel) has been released on 2013-04-03. R version 2.15.3 (Security Blanket) has been released on 2013-03-01 R version 2.15.2 (Trick or Treat) .... R version 2.15.1 ("Roasted Marshmallows") ... R version 2.15.0 ("Easter Beagle") R version 2.14.0 ("Great Pumpkin") Dear R help List, How are these version types

On 25 February 2011 16:55, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > The old interface expected FEs to keep track of everything, where as new interface tries to encapsulate as much info as possible. This should help cleanup FE code responsible to generate debugging information. I made a first pass in clang and simplified code little bit. There is more room for improvement now. If you

Eecho cancellation is used to eliminate the echo which mixed with near end speech, while it was occured by far end speech. It always work like this: Find the similar speech in near end speech and eliminate it. In case 1: Because the there is no echo in near end speech, and the EC module still works on it. So a inverse model is been calculated, and a inverse signal is produced. In this way ,

Please ignore this, some ignorant cretin here excluded sudo from being updated.? Never in my life will I understand anyone's reason for excluded THAT particular package. On 09/15/2017 08:40 AM, Mark Haney wrote: > Well, after three days of beating my head against my desk, I'm waving > the white flag.? I've got a CentOS 6.4 box (yeah, I know) that I blew > away the

All, When attempting to pxeboot the latest Xen3.0 hypervisor/kernel it was failing with the following error: ------ \ \/ /___ _ __ |___ / / _ \ _ _ _ __ ___| |_ __ _| |__ | | ___ \ // _ \ '_ \ |_ \| | | |__| | | | '_ \/ __| __/ _` | '_ \| |/ _ \ / \ __/ | | | ___) | |_| |__| |_| | | | \__ \ || (_| | |_) | | __/ /_/\_\___|_| |_| |____(_)___/ \__,_|_|

I am installing R 2.15.1 onto RHEL 6, using gcc 4.7.0 with Intel MKL 10.3.7 and the following environment: export BLAS_LIBS="-Wl,--start-group /usr/caen/intel-12.1/mkl/lib/intel64/libmkl_gf_lp64.a /usr/caen/intel-12.1/mkl/lib/intel64/libmkl_sequential.a /usr/caen/intel-12.1/mkl/lib/intel64/libmkl_core.a -Wl,--end-group -lpthread" export LAPACK_LIBS="-Wl,--start-group

> ?prompt [SNIP] ## Create a help file for each function in the .GlobalEnv: for(f in ls()) if(is.function(get(f))) prompt(name = f) > foo <- function(x) { cat(x, '\n')} > prompt(name="foo") Error in utils:::prompt(object, filename = filename, name = name, ...) : argument "object" is missing, with no default > version platform

On Aug 12, 2008, at 9:05 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > For some reason, they placed a whole bunch of > ObjC-building code into darwin.c, then had it call this function in > darwin-c.c. If I try to put that function into darwin.c, all hell > breaks loose. So even though the Fortran stuff wouldn't call the Obj-C > stuff in darwin.c, it appears like it still needs the darwin-c.c file

On Aug 13, 2008, at 10:11 AM, Devang Patel wrote: > On Aug 12, 2008, at 9:05 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: >> For some reason, they placed a whole bunch of >> ObjC-building code into darwin.c, then had it call this function in >> darwin-c.c. If I try to put that function into darwin.c, all hell >> breaks loose. So even though the Fortran stuff wouldn't call the >>

Hi David, I'm working on source to source transformations and instrumentation. A flag to disable 'va_arg' lowering in LLVM FEs will be very useful. Have you sent your modifications upstream to LLVM? If not, could you please share link to your public repository. Thanks, Sergey Yakoushkin On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:18 PM, David Meyer <pdox at google.com> wrote: > Neal, >

Hello everybody. I've been trying for weeks to find a solution for my problem, but since I couldn't find anything, here I am. I manage a network of about 200 PCs, 90% windows XP and Vista, 10% linux. A samba server is located on the main server, acting as a WINS server, to manage the list of connected computers. However, when a resident computer is badly configured (ie no wins server