similar to: Installing Sanba in SCO

If you upgrade to sco 5.0.7, you get samba 3.0.20 5.0.6 had samba 3.0.14. so im wondering why your using samba 2.2.. samba 3.0x. is on the supplimental discs. Gr. Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: dave at anchor-tech.co.uk >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens David Nolan >Verzonden: vrijdag 22 mei 2015 14:12 >Aan: 'Mauricio Tavares' >CC:

I think what I need is a prebuilt package. I currently use Samba 2.2.12 running on SCO OpenServer 5.0.6 but I am in the process of upgrading to 5.0.7. Can't move to SCO version 6 because our application isn't guaranteed to work on it. Regards Dave -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Mauricio Tavares

Does anyone know the most up to date version of Samba that will run on SCO OpenServer 5.0.7? Kind Regards Dave Nolan Anchor Technology

I have problems installing the latest release of Samba on Caldera (SCO) Openserver 5.0.6 I have downloaded the source and ran "./configure" fine. I get an error " line 664: Syntax error " when I run "make". If I run " ./configure --with-winbind", then run "make", I get the error "Compiling smbd/server.c include/includes.h, line 885:error:

Looking back in the samba mailing list archives, I see not soancient requests for samba on ancient SCO OpenServer systems. Recently faced with a situation where a Windows Server upgrade to 2012 R2 and broke an smbclient upload from a SCO OpenServer 5.0.7 system. Directory listings and file deletions did not fail, but all upload attempts produced empty files on the Windows server (this due,

Good Morning, I understand you provide support for the Samba project. I am searching for some FREE help solving what I think is a very simple problem for an experience Samba professional. I am running Samba 2.2.12 on an old SCO OpenServer 5.0.6 box. I cannot update to a more recent version of Samba as this is the last version that will run on SCO OpenServer 5.0.6. I have some

On SCO 5.0.7 and openssh 3.8.1p1, two entries are written to /etc/wtmp and /etc/wtmpx each time a user logs in via ssh. This can be demonstrated using the last(C) command. Any user connected via ssh will have two identical login and logout entries. On SCO, login_write() in loginrec.c calls both wtmp_write_entry() and wtmpx_write_entry() (USE_WTMP and USE_WTMPX are defined). wtmp_write_entry()

Dears Sirs; I'm tryng to compile and install samba 3.0.14a on a SCO Openserver 5.0.6 server (i want to use some shared printers from MS server2003 on a customer network, but with samba SCO ver 2.2, i can't obtain the authorization from the domain controller to use shared resources), but i'm havig a lot of trouble. I had dowloaded samba-3.0.14a.tar.gz fro Samba.org. I had put all the

Openssh 4.4p1 and 4.5p1 SCO Openserver 6 w/mp1, mp2 While installing v4.5p1, I noticed this sshd syslog error which began appearing when I upgraded from v4.3p2 to v4.4p1: Sep 1 17:54:41 tenzing sshd[12837]: error: Bind to port 22 on :: failed: \ Network is unreachable. sshd -d reports: debug1: Bind to port 22 on ::. Bind to port 22 on :: failed: Network is unreachable. debug1: Bind

Openssh 5.5p1 and 5.6p1 SCO OpenServer 5.0.7 I've built various versions of openssh on SCO OSR5.0.7 over the years without much of a problem. Beginning with 5.5p1 however, I have been unable to get a working install. I'm building with gcc 2.95.3. The build completes normally, but 'make tests' fails on several tests: sftp-cmds.sh failures (get command fails on both): - get

I downloaded the Openssh-2.3.0p1 file and ran configure only to have it fail reporting the lack of libz. I found that configure was failing beacuse the test program did not include the libtinfo and libm which are needed to resolve references in libprot. I made changes to the configure script to add those libraries for SCO Openserver and then tried to compile the programs only to run into another

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 8:31 AM, L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote: > If you upgrade to sco 5.0.7, you get samba 3.0.20 > 5.0.6 had samba 3.0.14. so im wondering why your using samba 2.2.. > samba 3.0x. is on the supplimental discs. > > Gr. > > Louis Been there, done that. Samba 2.2 was built into the base release, supplements weren't always stable or well

On 09/12/18 16:56, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 03:27:37PM -0500, Kevin R. Bulgrien via samba wrote: >> Looking back in the samba mailing list archives, I see not soancient requests >> for samba on ancient SCO OpenServer systems. >> >> Recently faced with a situation where a Windows Server upgrade to 2012 R2 and >> broke an smbclient

I''ve been dealing with SCO OpenServer 5.0.6 lately, and was forced to use VMware Workstation when I couldn''t get it working on Xen. That let me use it with IDE emulated drives, that avoided the whole intricate fun and games of installing compatible SCSI drivers. But VMWare ESX, which was not what I''d wanted to deal with, got selected for use, and since it

Hi, I have been trying to build openssh 3.4p1 on SCO Open Server xxx It requires the libcrypto.a library produced by OpenSSL. So, I downloaded and installed OpenSSL 0.9.6d. As part of the configure process for OpenSSH, 'configure' checks for version of libcrypto.a with RAND_add(). RAND_add is defined in rand_lib.c and during the build of OpenSSH, I can see that rand_lib.c is compiled

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 03:27:37PM -0500, Kevin R. Bulgrien via samba wrote: > Looking back in the samba mailing list archives, I see not soancient requests > for samba on ancient SCO OpenServer systems. > > Recently faced with a situation where a Windows Server upgrade to 2012 R2 and > broke an smbclient upload from a SCO OpenServer 5.0.7 system. Directory > listings and file

For those of you following the IBM vs SCO legal case, you have probably noticed that SCO has said that the GPL is invalid. IBM appears to make the reasonable case that you can't say something is void, and then rely on it. INAL, but why is SCO allowed to distribute Samba without agreeing to the GPL? That's like buying a car, then claiming the sale agreement is bogus but you still want

Hi, I'm still waiting for my list subscription but if I don't send in this bug report now I won't for who-knows-how-long and I want to get it in.... I'm using 2.5.6 compiled from cvs on SCO Open Server 5.0.6 bothe machines are the same version of OS and the same copy of rsync. on my live machine one of the database files eventually got to be 2 gigs the file has since then been

Good evening, has anyone previously compiled a client for SCO 5.0.7 and would share the binaries? Or knows a place where I could find a package (no google success)? I want to hook in a SCO box with no compiler on board (= it should also shutdown when the UPS, connected to a linux box running the server, signals the need to shutdown). Also some tips on how this can be integrated with SCO would

I am using a SCO Unix system version 2.1.2 where I develop some application. This SCO Unix system is connected to a TCP/IP network. On the same segment also a NT 4.0 server is running. This NT server makes each day a backup of some directories on the NT server. what I want to realise is, make a NFS directory on the SCO unix server pointed to the NT server. So that the applications developed on