similar to: Samba performance with large directories

Hello I can''t seem to be able to get X working on domain U My setup domain0 -ubuntu breezy domainU -ubuntu breezy I tried 3 techniques 1. ssh -X domainU steps: on domain U $ export DISPLAY=:0 $ xhost + xhost: unable to open display ":0" on domain0 ssh -X domainU result: ssh conection established no X forwarding starts. after login tried

I''ve noticed that if I use the numericality validator and the user enters, for example "1234ABCD" it''ll come back with a "not a number" error, but it then fills the input box with "1234", discarding the non- numeric input the user originally put in. I''ve seen a similar question about this in this group, but the poster was looking for a way

I have read ?zoo but am not sure how to relate the parameters (x, order.by, frequency, and style) to my data.frame. The structure of the data.frame is 'data.frame': 11169 obs. of 4 variables: $ stream : Factor w/ 37 levels "Burns","CIL",..: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... $ sampdate: Date, format: "1987-07-23" "1987-09-17" ... $ param : Factor w/

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722 Summary: double entry of nf_conntrack_max in /proc Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: nf_conntrack AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

Hello everyone, Merging two dataframes should be easy. However when I try to merge, R doesn't recognize identical values, even if I am doing it by values that have no decimals. willclayong: vs30 LON LAT Net X wills.cat wills.vs30 clahan.cat clahanvs30 PolyID.wills PolyID.clahan tif.cat STA ELEVATION tif.vs30 1 338.539 -3849590 4319319 <NA> 2 D 301

Hello, I'm curious if anyone has attempted using Asterisk with any Zaptel cards in on one of IBM's OpenPower servers. I've read via some googling and posts the the astmasters list that there is/was a working version of the Zaptel driver for PPC under Yellow Dog Linux. Any thoughts? Thanks, Ilan

Hello, I got CentOS for PPC64 from this link <http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/isos/ppc64/> but it uses grub. I want to use CentOS on a PowerPC Freescale T2080 board with U-Boot as the boot loader. Is it available? Thanks and regards Jaytirth S. Khairatkar | Assistant Manager -------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------

Hi, I am wondering why we dont support PPC32 LE? Here is the output of llvm-mc --version, in which only PPC32, PPC64 & PPC64LE are supported. $ llvm-mc --version LLVM (http://llvm.org/): LLVM version 3.6.2 Optimized build with assertions. Built Aug 2 2015 (11:39:46). Default target: x86_64-apple-darwin15.4.0 Host CPU: core-avx2 Registered Targets: aarch64 - AArch64

The R 4.0.0 package migration on Debian is being held back by a failed build on ppc64el [1]. We can see from the history of builds logs [2] that it used to build, briefly failed, worked again and then failed leading to R 4.0.0's release. (And my bad for missing how the alpha1/alpha2/beta/rc builds failed.) I have however neither changed anything, nor did I ever have to accomodate ppc64el (as

Hello, today I updated a CentOS 7.6 ppc64le machine to CentOS 7.7. After reboot to the new kernel (4.18.0-80.7.2.el7.ppc64le) dkms could not build the nvidia-module. Error-message from dkms: Compiler version check failed: The major and minor number of the compiler used to compile the kernel: gcc version 8.3.1 20190311 (Red Hat 8.3.1-3) (GCC) does not match the compiler used here: cc (GCC)

About week ago, we moved our production puppet server to an older IBM OpenPower Server with 8 cores and 8GB ram. We use Ubuntu 8.04 LTS for the PowerPC (the most recent version for this hardware). We have puppet 0.24.8, Apache+ssl, Passenger 2.2.2 and Rack 1.0. We manage 780 identically configured compute nodes and gateways with a mix of ppc and x86 cpu''s running either CentOS 5.3, or

On 18/07/17 12:02, Jaytirth S Khairatkar wrote: > Hello, > > I got CentOS for PPC64 from this link > <http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/isos/ppc64/> but it uses grub. I want > to use CentOS on a PowerPC Freescale T2080 board with U-Boot as the boot > loader. Is it available? > > > Thanks and regards > > Jaytirth S. Khairatkar | Assistant Manager

On 25/09/2019 10:30, Ralf Aum?ller wrote: > Hello, > > today I updated a CentOS 7.6 ppc64le machine to CentOS 7.7. After reboot > to the new kernel (4.18.0-80.7.2.el7.ppc64le) dkms could not build the > nvidia-module. > > Error-message from dkms: > > Compiler version check failed: > > The major and minor number of the compiler used to > compile the kernel:

Hum, at least it is not Apple, so maybe you can attach a debugger to the running process? (gdb -p process_id or something like that --- haven't actually done it for a decade). Then at least we can get a stack trace and a clue about where it is looping. Diddling optimization options can also sometimes provide a clue. -pd > On 29 Apr 2020, at 01:17 , Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at

Hi All, My group is looking for any suggestions on what to purchase to achieve the most powerful number crunching system that $50k can buy. The main application that will be used is R so input on what hardware benefits R most will be appreciated. The requirements are that it be a single standalone server (i.e. not a cluster solution), and it that must be able to run unix/linux. If

On July 8, 2020 11:01:20 AM AKDT, Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> wrote: >Am 08.07.2020 um 20:28 schrieb Kishore Potnuru: >> Thank you for the reply. >> >> As per our current infrastructure, I can go maximum of the redhat 7.7 >> version. Not more than that. Am I able to install or upgrade to >dovecot 2.3 >> version in redhat 7.7? I am running

Hi folks PV-GRUB built from Xen 3.3.0 is not able to read from devices without a partition table: | grubdom> root (hd0) | Filesystem type unknown, using whole disk Part of the config: | disk = [ "phy:vg0_sledgehammer/servext_root,xvda,w" ] Device: | # file -s /dev/vg0_sledgehammer/servext_root | /dev/vg0_sledgehammer/servext_root: symbolic link to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Actually determined this was a CUPS issue. I split the CUPS and Samba servers, system load on the Samba box now averages about 0.3 while load average on the CUPS system is about 0.8 or 1. Thanks, Derek On Aug 28, 2005, at 9:47 AM, Jim Ross wrote: > Derek Harkness wrote: > >> Is it better to setup lots of small print servers or one

Hello all Im using sftp 1:4.7p1-8ubuntu1.2 in a batchjob Ive noticed that sftp needs a long time for sending a filelist. The timespan increases exponential if many files are on the remoteserver. for example "ls -la *.txt" needs 10 seconds for 2000 files but needs 50 seconds for 4000 files. For 150.000 Files i have to wait 15 minutes for example but the

????? ?????????? ?? 200.000 ?? 300.000 ?????? ? ?????. ????? ??????? ?? ?????? ??????????? ??????. ?????? ??????????? ?? ????? ????? ??????: http://market716.0catch.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/attachments/20140502/cb05eebc/attachment.html>