similar to: RHEL 4.0 / Samba 3.0.10 Domain Controller

--NoDisclaim-- I cant use an editor to mass update and change usernames as this is a part of an automatic useradd routine written in an ancient legacy application which calls useradd and usermod, we have been using this software for more than 15 years, so its hard for me to argue for a rewrite, so im forced to bend the OS instead it isnt a problem on redhat 8.0, so somewhere in the patches for

Hello, my passdb backend in the smb.conf m does make troubles. The entry is: passdb backend=ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1. I seems to be right? My system is: Suse 9.2 with openldap 2.2.25-5.2 and samba 3.0.7-5.1 Suse 9.2 clients and Win xp Clients. If I take the passdb backend entry out of the smb.conf, loggons of the xp clients are working for me. If the entry is inside, loggons failed. The Suse

Hello all, This message is simple instructions to install Samba + OpenLDAP on FreeBSD (4.7). Hope it would help someone. 1. To keep ports update, better install cvsupit in the beginning mis3# cd /usr/ports/net/cvsupit mis3# make install clean Reference: FreeBSD Unleashed (by Urban and Tiemann), p. 425 2. To use Samba + OpenLDAP with the option "ldap ssl =

Hi there, I've a question about how to add a Win2000 machine without using the administrator account of the win-client. For example, I want to install a client-machine until the local login. Now I want to sent the pc to a different location where the user should only enter his account and password and domain. The useraccount and machineaccount are already created with smbpassed -ma

Hi. Only indirectly related to zfs. I need to test diskusage/performance on zfs shared via nfs. I have installed nevada b64a. Historically uid/gid for user www has been 16/16 but when I try to add uid/gid www via smc with the value 16 I''m not allowed to do so. I''m coming from a FreeBSD backgroup. Here I alter uid using vipw and edit /etc/group afterwards. -- regards Claus

Well, let's try to be more precise about my issue and give some updates: I try to make a classicupgrade and meanwhile, change the Domain name during the process, which includes realm and NetBIOS domain name. I precisely meet difficulties with changing the NetBIOS domain name. What i've tried so far: 1) Change the NetBIOS domain name "workgroup" attribute on the old Samba 3

Hi, We're running dovecot 2.2.13, virtual users, with postfix. We have an olddomain and a new domainname. To 'translate' *@olddomain into *@newdomain, I have configured: > cat /etc/postfix/canonical > @olddomain.com @newdomain.com While this seems to work, lately we have noticed that dovecot occasionally creates mailboxes for non-existent users, like: >

We have run into the following problem when trying to run vampire against our PDC. I am not sure how to interprete the error messages here. Why are there 2 line numbers given? I have run into other problems with smbldap-tools and am not sure how to interprete those errors either. # # Since I initially wrote this : I have done some work on it and found that it has something to do with the

Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2004 11:34 am Post subject: Samba/winbind and ADS problem I almost have this. I have read the docs, I have read this, I have purchased both books from the samba team, and I cannot find any help from any of these. We are trying to migrate from OLDDOMAIN (an NT4 Domain) to NEWDOMAIN (our Win2k3 Domain). I have a two way trust right now between the domains. I have

Hoping this is an error of stupidity or ignorance on my part. Running Centos 4.6, after the big update from 4.5. Samba would not communicate with our samba PDC (3.0.10), kept getting NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME errors. I will most likely update all our samba servers, but do not want to do it knowing that the two versions may not talk. Here's my smb.conf, currently functional - does not

Thanks again Rowland for getting back to me.  Here's my comments below: >> /etc/hosts: >> 127.0.0.1       localhost >> 192.168.0.17    ad.domain.intranet ad >> 192.168.0.21    domain-ad.domain.intranet     domain-ad > > Remove the line above, this is the old AD domain and shouldn't have > anything pointing to the new one. Have deleted this line. 

Current Setup: Bunch of Sun SPARCstation's running Solaris 7 in a NIS environment. I have installed Samba 2.2.5 on a host 'A' (NIS Slave). Basic set up is working fine. Meaning, I can mount unix fileshare on windows system. OBJECTIVE: The idea is to mount some UNIX file systems on Windows at boot time and make it available to all users using Windows. To

We have an ubuntu 14.04 server running samba 4.1.6 that is a member of our OLDDOMAIN. We recently added a new trusted domain to our forest. We noticed any new directories created by users in that new domain take a long time for the directory to list in the command line. This does not seem to happen when listing the directories with only user/group ID: root at

Hi, On one of my servers (old one, version 1.2.5) user reported that vacation message for basic address works fine, but not for the aliases. I know that this is an old version, but we can't simply switch them to the most current dovecot release without preparing and testing everything... So I'm rather asking for help with debugging the case :) This person has email my.name at

Hi Rowland, Denis Thank you very much for your answers, It helped really a lot. And sorry for the delay of answer, was busy on other stuff. You advices don't lead me straight to the solution, but i get improvements, thanks to it. For now, whatever i can do to change the workgroup, It changes the Domain SID. Actually it's more subtle; Before change workgroup: #net getdomainsid

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-00:58 Security Advisory FreeBSD, Inc. Topic: chpass family contains local root vulnerability Category: core Module:

On 8/23/2017 4:30 AM, lists wrote: > Hi, > > Not sure what the lack of replies means... As postfix is also > involved, should I better ask there? > > It seems a little bit in between postfix and dovecot... > > Just to clearify one thing I wrote: > > On 22-8-2017 16:23, lists wrote: >> We're running dovecot 2.2.13, virtual users, with postfix. We >>

Hi, we currently run one samba v3.0 domain "DOMAIN30" with WinXP domain members and Win7/8 accessing the file server without domain membership. Then we run a second samba v3.5 domain "NEWDOMAIN" with WinXP/7/8 domain members. Which was migrated from a NT4 PDC to samba 3.0 and to v3.5 eventually. Neither domain has anything fancy about it: users and joined workstations,

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- bash-2.04# smbpasswd -a -m inet-p$ User inet-p$ does not exist in system password file (usually /etc/passwd). Cannot add account without a valid local system user. Failed to modify password entry for user inet-p$ -------------- next part -------------- Add NT Machines. Every NT that will be on the domain must

Hi all, I wonder if using a per-user sieve_before setting (ie: a relative path to user home, as ~/filter.sieve) is expected to work corretly. Full disclaimer: I am migrating an old CentOS 6.10 box with dovecot 2.0.9 and an old pigenhole version. I now want to redirect emails from old account to new account (I have a csv with old->new address pairs). My first approach using a single, big