similar to: novice - samba3+; suse linuxpro9.1

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "novice - samba3+; suse linuxpro9.1"

2005 Jul 08
1
small lan - novice - 2
Hi, armed with Samba-3 -by example I proceeded to test my 2 linux lan [suselinux pro 9.1 with Samba 3.0.9-2.6-suse]. I followed instructions and made the smb.config as small as possiblw: [global] workgroup = snj server string = Samba Server guest ok = yes [orb] comment = removable 2.2 gb hd path = /orb browsable = yes read only = no However, I was stumped practically immediately as you can
2005 Jul 08
0
small lan - 2 solved
Hi, I got the validation to work. scn@west:~> smbclient -L west -U% Domain=[SNJ] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.9-2.6-SUSE] Sharename Type Comment --------- ---- ------- orb Disk removable 2.2 gb hd IPC$ IPC IPC Service (Samba Server) ADMIN$ IPC IPC Service (Samba Server) Domain=[SNJ]
2005 Jun 24
1
Samba3 - small lan [1]
Hi, I have posted to this list once before without any reply. It would be nice if some reply could indicate why the posting was not appropriate and some indication as to what one should do - the last time I included my smbconf. This time I have reworked my questions, limited their scope , and put them in two emails. I have two essentially identical linux computers [east and west] both running
2005 Apr 18
1
error msg using testparm
hi, I'm new to Samba. I use Suse linux 9.1pro & kde on a small network with Samba 3.0.9. I tried the testparm from the Official Samba -3 howto. Unfortunately the book, etc. does not address the error msg given, follows. Can somebody help? scn@scn:~> testparm -s -v | egrep "(lp|print|spool|driver|ports|\[)" Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf Processing section
2013 Jan 24
1
how should I make the optional arguments in r?
HI, I guess I did sth wrong with the optional argument in the program. but I don't know how should I make it. in my main program: source("getelasticity_overPB.r") crossprice<-getelasticity(mydata,mydatao,"nest")$cross_p is same with crossprice<-getelasticity(mydata,mydatao)$cross_p I don't know why???? In ""getelasticity_overPB.r": I have the
2008 Jan 15
1
bug in mmlcr ? (PR#10576)
Hi the list. Is there a bug in mmlcr package ? The following code does not compile: mmlcrTest <- function(dataW){ dataL <- reshape(dataW,idvar="id",timevar="T",varying=list("T0","T1","T2"),direction="long",v.names="score") resultR <- mmlcr(outer= ~ 1 | id, components = list(list(formula =
2005 Jun 28
0
small lan - novice
Hi, John, thanks for replying. I am fully aware that this is a volunteer effort and do appreciate it very much. I really didn't expect an automatic answer - I was suggesting an automatic response which could indicate the objection[s]? I have downloaded the S3be `book' and ordered it from amazon. I was puzzled by your comment: `Please do not refer to smbfs's friends as Samba. The
2014 Jul 11
2
[LLVMdev] Lowering to return multiple values: codeGen, instruction write one value to the input register.
Hi All, In XCore backend, I saw “ …... EVT VT = Op.getValueType(); SDValue Data = DAG.getNode(XCoreISD::CRC8, DL, DAG.getVTList(VT, VT), Op.getOperand(1), Op.getOperand(2) , Op.getOperand(3)); SDValue Crc(Data.getNode(), 1); SDValue Results[] = { Crc, Data }; return DAG.getMergeValues(Results, 2, DL); “ which is used to lower an
2013 Jun 07
0
[PATCH RFC] s390/virtio-ccw: Adapter interrupt support.
Handle the new CCW_CMD_SET_IND_ADAPTER command enabling adapter interrupts on guest request. When active, host->guest notifications will be handled via global_indicator -> queue indicators instead of queue indicators + subchannel I/O interrupt. Indicators for virtqueues may be present at an offset. Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> --- hw/s390x/css.c |
2013 Jul 09
0
[RFC PATCH v2] s390/virtio-ccw: Adapter interrupt support.
Handle the new CCW_CMD_SET_IND_ADAPTER command enabling adapter interrupts on guest request. When active, host->guest notifications will be handled via global_indicator -> queue indicators instead of queue indicators + subchannel I/O interrupt. Indicators for virtqueues may be present at an offset. Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> --- hw/s390x/css.c |
2019 Apr 09
0
[RFC PATCH 05/12] s390/cio: add protected virtualization support to cio
On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 01:16:15 +0200 Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > Virtio-ccw relies on cio mechanisms for bootstrapping the ccw device. Well, a ccw device is, by definition, using cio mechanisms ;) Better say: "As virtio-ccw devices are channel devices, we need to use the dma area for any communication with the hypervisor." Or something like that. > Thus we
2019 Jun 12
0
[PATCH v5 3/8] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
As virtio-ccw devices are channel devices, we need to use the dma area within the common I/O layer for any communication with the hypervisor. Note that we do not need to use that area for control blocks directly referenced by instructions, e.g. the orb. It handles neither QDIO in the common code, nor any device type specific stuff (like channel programs constructed by the DASD driver). An
2019 Apr 26
0
[PATCH 06/10] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
As virtio-ccw devices are channel devices, we need to use the dma area for any communication with the hypervisor. This patch addresses the most basic stuff (mostly what is required for virtio-ccw), and does take care of QDIO or any devices. An interesting side effect is that virtio structures are now going to get allocated in 31 bit addressable storage. Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic at
2019 May 23
0
[PATCH v2 3/8] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
From: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> As virtio-ccw devices are channel devices, we need to use the dma area for any communication with the hypervisor. It handles neither QDIO in the common code, nor any device type specific stuff (like channel programs constructed by the DASD driver). An interesting side effect is that virtio structures are now going to get allocated in 31 bit
2019 May 29
0
[PATCH v3 3/8] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
From: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> As virtio-ccw devices are channel devices, we need to use the dma area for any communication with the hypervisor. It handles neither QDIO in the common code, nor any device type specific stuff (like channel programs constructed by the DASD driver). An interesting side effect is that virtio structures are now going to get allocated in 31 bit
2002 Jan 25
3
suid files and bsd
Currently I only have one machine backing up to another. I am backing up to a filesystem that is mounted as nosuid. The syncing process works perfectly except it fails on files that are suid. Example proc/ root/ tmp/ mknod tmp/mysql.sock : Invalid argument mknod tmp/orbit-daud/orb-12573780511489051058 : Invalid argument mknod tmp/orbit-daud/orb-139425434385535813 : Invalid argument mknod
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 9/12] base-into-desc
Move base / limit accessors into desc.h, where they properly belong. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> Index: linux-2.6.13/include/asm-i386/system.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.13.orig/include/asm-i386/system.h 2005-08-08 17:58:03.000000000 -0700 +++ linux-2.6.13/include/asm-i386/system.h 2005-08-08 18:01:31.000000000 -0700
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 9/12] base-into-desc
Move base / limit accessors into desc.h, where they properly belong. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> Index: linux-2.6.13/include/asm-i386/system.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.13.orig/include/asm-i386/system.h 2005-08-08 17:58:03.000000000 -0700 +++ linux-2.6.13/include/asm-i386/system.h 2005-08-08 18:01:31.000000000 -0700
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 10/14] i386 / Move descriptor accessors into desc h
Move base / limit accessors into desc.h, where they properly belong. Patch-base: 2.6.13-rc5-mm1 Patch-keys: i386 desc cleanup Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> Index: linux-2.6.13/include/asm-i386/system.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.13.orig/include/asm-i386/system.h 2005-08-09 20:17:26.000000000 -0700 +++
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 10/14] i386 / Move descriptor accessors into desc h
Move base / limit accessors into desc.h, where they properly belong. Patch-base: 2.6.13-rc5-mm1 Patch-keys: i386 desc cleanup Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> Index: linux-2.6.13/include/asm-i386/system.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.13.orig/include/asm-i386/system.h 2005-08-09 20:17:26.000000000 -0700 +++