similar to: Demote old NT4 PDC to member of Samba domain?

Thanks again Rowland for getting back to me.  Here's my comments below: >> /etc/hosts: >> 127.0.0.1       localhost >> 192.168.0.17    ad.domain.intranet ad >> 192.168.0.21    domain-ad.domain.intranet     domain-ad > > Remove the line above, this is the old AD domain and shouldn't have > anything pointing to the new one. Have deleted this line. 

Hi, We're running dovecot 2.2.13, virtual users, with postfix. We have an olddomain and a new domainname. To 'translate' *@olddomain into *@newdomain, I have configured: > cat /etc/postfix/canonical > @olddomain.com @newdomain.com While this seems to work, lately we have noticed that dovecot occasionally creates mailboxes for non-existent users, like: >

A client has an existing NT4 domain with several NT4 servers. Two of the NT4 Servers function as a PDC and a BDC. We are installing Samba-3 on SuSE 9.0 Pro as a PDC with an LDAP backend, and decommissioning the NT4 PDC at the same time. So far, so good. We can also rebuild the old PDC hardware as a Samba-3 on SuSE 9.0 Pro BDC. Unfortunately however, the NT4 BDC cannot be removed from the network

Hello All, I'm looking for some advice \ shared past experiences of users on the list. I am in the process of planning a migration from an existing NT Domain to a Samba 3 / LDAP based domain. However, the existing NT4 PDC is also home to our Exchange 5.5 email server which we would like to keep in service. I imagine what i need to do is add the old NT4 PDC server to the new Samba Domain once i

Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2004 11:34 am Post subject: Samba/winbind and ADS problem I almost have this. I have read the docs, I have read this, I have purchased both books from the samba team, and I cannot find any help from any of these. We are trying to migrate from OLDDOMAIN (an NT4 Domain) to NEWDOMAIN (our Win2k3 Domain). I have a two way trust right now between the domains. I have

Hi, On one of my servers (old one, version 1.2.5) user reported that vacation message for basic address works fine, but not for the aliases. I know that this is an old version, but we can't simply switch them to the most current dovecot release without preparing and testing everything... So I'm rather asking for help with debugging the case :) This person has email my.name at

On 8/23/2017 2:53 PM, mj wrote: > > On 08/23/2017 06:03 PM, Noel wrote: >> Don't use wildcard aliases.? They break recipient validation and >> cause postfix to accept all addresses. >> >> Instead use 1-1 aliases, such as >> user1 at olddomaon? user1 at newdomain >> user2 at olddomaon? user2 at newdomain > > But we have 500+ addresses in ldap,

On 8/23/2017 4:30 AM, lists wrote: > Hi, > > Not sure what the lack of replies means... As postfix is also > involved, should I better ask there? > > It seems a little bit in between postfix and dovecot... > > Just to clearify one thing I wrote: > > On 22-8-2017 16:23, lists wrote: >> We're running dovecot 2.2.13, virtual users, with postfix. We >>

Hi all, I wonder if using a per-user sieve_before setting (ie: a relative path to user home, as ~/filter.sieve) is expected to work corretly. Full disclaimer: I am migrating an old CentOS 6.10 box with dovecot 2.0.9 and an old pigenhole version. I now want to redirect emails from old account to new account (I have a csv with old->new address pairs). My first approach using a single, big

Are you sure of that ? I thought it was possible... If it is not, I've got another slightly off topic question : how to I demote my former Windows NT PDC (that is now a BDC) to a normal Windows NT server, so that I have no problem with it ? Thanks in advance. -------- Message d'origine-------- De: Umberto Zanatta [mailto:uzanatta@provincia.treviso.it] Date: lun. 26/07/2004 14:09

I was wondering if somebody could help me with an Apache re-write rule. Apparently CentOS 6.8 is running apache-2.2.15-53. I am trying to redirect all pages except for two pages. The apache rewrite directives in the httpd config are: RewriteEngine on RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI}!^/test/ RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI}!^/my-folder/ RewriteRule (.*) http://www.newdomain.com/$1 [R=301,L] These commands

On 16/10/2017 18:18, Rowland Penny wrote: > > 'workgroup' is not the netbios name, it is the NetBIOS domain name. > The workgroup should also not have a dot in it, 'DOMAIN.LAN' looks > suspiciously like a dns and realm name. > Indeed i lacked of precision, purpose of the post was more "change NetBIOS domain name during clasicupgrade". DOMAIN.LAN is the

Hello, I'm trying to migrate mail accounts from an old server to a new one. As I need to migrate dozens of accounts which take about 1G each, I need to do stateful sync to make my migration in two times : 1 - I run a : doveadm -D -o mail_fsync=never -o imapc_user=user1 at olddomain.fr sync -s "" -R -1 -u user1 at newdomain.fr imapc: > /tmp/firstsync.log 2>&1 my

Hello friends, I am trying to test NAS I/O performance over a network and trying to see the numbers for write and read speed. I have successfully configured and ran a lot of tests. However the numbers have not increased, I have reached a bottleneck. I tried playing around with the smb.conf file including all possible variations like, socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=(tried values like

On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 19:16:51 +0200 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Mandi! Havany via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > >> It sounds like you are still using the old, deprecated (by Windows) > >> roaming profiles, instead of Folder redirection. > > ?! Some more clue, Rowland? I use roaming profiles *AND* folder >

We are migrating all of our users from the current domain to a new one we created. In this process we are moving them from roaming profiles to local. What would be the best practice to accomplish this? I can find plenty of writeups on how to do the opposite. Also we will be doing some extra folder redirection. Currently we only redirect their my documents to the server. On the new system we plan

Hi, we currently run one samba v3.0 domain "DOMAIN30" with WinXP domain members and Win7/8 accessing the file server without domain membership. Then we run a second samba v3.5 domain "NEWDOMAIN" with WinXP/7/8 domain members. Which was migrated from a NT4 PDC to samba 3.0 and to v3.5 eventually. Neither domain has anything fancy about it: users and joined workstations,

Hi list, My goal is to share a few shares from a solaris 9 host with a new win2012 domain. Im rather new to solaris (some years of linux exp, but samba has been a LONG time ago) The solaris machine has been created as a machine account in AD under its hostname by the windows admins in the new win2012 domain. (Thats not me, although I have domain admin access if need be) I have an issue changing

We have an ubuntu 14.04 server running samba 4.1.6 that is a member of our OLDDOMAIN. We recently added a new trusted domain to our forest. We noticed any new directories created by users in that new domain take a long time for the directory to list in the command line. This does not seem to happen when listing the directories with only user/group ID: root at

Hi all, I recently moved off of an ancient NT4 PDC to a SMB PDC running Samba 3.0.4-1 on a RH9 box. I had absolutely no troubles joining the domain, and other than a few login quirks every now and again, it is stable. I am, however, experiencing what I believe to be a permissions issue with the user profiles... my own, included. I am unable to make registry changes, most notably with