similar to: when working with "admin users =" "inherit owner" does not work anymore

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "when working with "admin users =" "inherit owner" does not work anymore"

2005 Jul 29
2
weird problem with smbldap-tools and usrmgr.exe
hi folks, i hope you can help me!!! i'm using samba v3.0.14a (sernet) on debian sarge. openldap v2 is my backend, smbldap-tools 0.8.4 (patched for our organization). when adding a user via usrmgr.exe to an existing domain group i get the following error: [in usrgmr] The following error occured changing the properies of the user xxx User does not belong to this group [in smbd.logs]
2005 Oct 25
1
[Fwd: [Problem] Samba v3 Errors when group and user exists with same name]
Hi folks, it's not really an issue for me but could you please comment this behaviour i described? may be i can then open a bug report. thx! -- Michael Gasch Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Department of Human Evolution (IT) Deutscher Platz 6 D-04103 Leipzig Germany Phone: 49 (0)341 - 3550 137
2005 Jul 29
3
How to prevent users from deleting users from domain via usrmgr.exe ???
hi, weird thing: i thought when commenting out "delete user script" and "ldap delete dn" nobody is able to delete users from the domain. what happens: users are deleted, to be more specific their samba attributes are deleted but not their posix values. i won't let our admins delete users from our domain becaus we have another management to add/delete users to/from a
2005 Dec 12
7
The single WINS problem: question
hello I've been reading the thread (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=113286376900001&r=1&w=2) and I have the same limitation with WINS in a PDC/BDC. That's why I have the following (experimental) setup: PDC ==> wins support = yes, passdb backend: master ldap BDC ==> wins support = yes, passdb backend: slave ldap I configured some of my XP clients to use both WINS servers
2005 Sep 20
6
net rpc vampire / Question or Problem?
Hello list, i did a quite sucessfull net rpc vampire but one promblem remains. Everything is fine, but the user group memberships aren't restored. Only alle primary group member ships are restored. every user is in the primgrp (4126 Users). All Groups (2659) are restored including sids. but no membership is restored! I don't know why. here's my command: net rpc vampire -l -S nt4pdc
2006 Feb 02
3
samba4wins only with samba >=3.0.21?
hi, i read about samba4wins, which is really a great work from the team! do you know, if this will work with samba v3.0.14a? i ask because a german news service writes that it?s only possible with 3.0.21 (http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/69132), but i can?t find this information in the notes on http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba4WINS/samba4wins-1.0.0-16/ thx for helping me! -- Michael
2005 Dec 06
2
Help IDMAP_RID and trusted domains
hi, it?s me again :( i?m still not able to use idmap_rid in a trusted domain environment (samba v3.0.20b Sernet). well, to be clear: NSS is not working (id, getent passwd <user>, ...) so samba does not find the posix information for any user from a foreign domain it?s working in a single domain with ##################################### # WINBIND - Settings idmap backend =
2005 Sep 08
1
[UNDERSTANDING] BDC and Trusted Domain
hi list, just for my knowledge -> we have a working PDC / BDC infrastructure for our domain DOMA, where PDC trusts another PDC from DOMB (all samba v3). when PDC from DOMA goes down, is the trust still valid or do we have to setup the trust on *both* DCs from DOMA (net rpc trustdom establish DOMB ... )? is that possible at all? thx&greez -- Michael Gasch Max Planck Institute for
2005 Jul 05
1
Inherit Owner Question Folder Rights
Hello, I am running Suse Linux 9.3 an Samba 3.0.20pre. I want to set up a folder where the user can only store files and copy them to an other folder. The User should not be able to delete modify or open the stored messages. Any ideas how I can realize this? Thanks! Greez
2005 Sep 20
1
Embedding a "Domain Group" in "Domain Administrators" ???
hi list, is it possible with samba v3 and ldap backend to embedd a normal group like "normalgroup" in the group "Domain Administrators" to give members of the group "normalgroup" full administrative rights on workstations? i tried with "net groupmap addmem sid-of-normalgroup sid-of-domain-admins" and "net groupmap addmem sid-of-domain-admins
2005 Oct 26
2
-DIdmap_rid_support_trusted_domains
hi, i have a question about winbind, idmap_rid and trusted domains. at sambaxp jerry said it's possible to have idmap_rid working with trusted domains. this is what we would like to have here. smbd -b doesn't show this compile option on 3.0.14a rpm (SuSE). may be this is normal, but how do i ensure that this option is in my binary w/ testing too much :) or how can i compile it
2006 Nov 13
4
Trouble Renaming Computer
Hi, i've just migrated from nt4 to samba 3.0.10-1.4E.9 with tdbsam, running on Centos 4.4 The net rpc vampire went fairly smoothly. Now that samba is running as the PDC (nt4 machine has been laid to rest) i am having trouble renaming computers in the domain. If i try this from the windows workstation (XP Professional) i get access denied. I use "root" or administrator which is
2005 May 19
1
Mac OSX breaking POSIX rights with SMB/CIFS
hi list, we recently saw the following weird behaviour on samba v3.0.13 with MacOSX panther and tiger as clients --setup-- [share1] path = /data valid users = @admins force user = administrator inherit permissions = yes force create mode = 770 force directory mode = 2770 [share2] path = /data/folder valid users = @noadmins force user = administrator inherit permissions = yes force create mode
2004 Jan 21
1
HELP with "no mapping between account names and security ids was done"
hi i've been sucessfully using samba 3.0.0 and win2k/xp clients in a domain if i try to add a win2k/xp workstation in a samba 3.0.1 controlled domain (with the same smb.conf as the 3.0.0 PDC), i always get "no mapping between account names and security ids was done" the same workstation can enter a 3.0.0 controlled domain with no problems ! machine accounts were also created so
2005 Feb 05
2
[HELP] Rsync to remote machine sometimes produces different binaries
hi, i'm using machine 1 (SuSE 9.0 32Bit): rsync 2.6.2 (from SuSE RPM) machine 2 (SuSE 9.1 64Bit): rsync 2.6.2 (from SuSE RPM) my command looks like the following: /usr/bin/rsync -W --progress --rsync-path=/usr/local/bin/rsync -e ssh --delete --force -av /data/ machine2:/data/machine1/ after rsyncing both machines, some files differ ! i verified these differences with "diff",
2007 Feb 28
1
vfs_shadow and [homes]
hi, i was able to successfully run vfs_shadow on a samba share with win xp shadow copy client. but i think it?s currently not implemented that one could export [homes] with this vfs object, because AFAIK each @GMT-snap has to resist directly under the samba share. but [homes] is a virtual share representing different shares (depending on users). has anybody hints about using vfs_shadow with
2005 Sep 12
1
modify owner of file from windows xp client
Hi, How user can modify the owner of file if he?s not an Admin. thanks
2003 Dec 28
1
What does "vfs object = netatalk" really do?
hi@all i'm using netatalk and samba as fileserver for different clients (OS9,X,WinNT/2K/XP) to create shares, that are visible and accessible for all clients (via afp/smb) i created a folder and made it public in all daemons (atalk, samba) to get a better file handling i'm using the samba feature: vfs object = netatalk but there are still some problems files that are created via afp
2006 Feb 09
3
Xp Home hack + Domain join
Hello fellows, Does anyone of you has found the hack to permit win xp home edition to join a domain controller. I found somewhere on the net a software that does this. But it cost 145 $ US, so like the upgrade... ( the only difference in that i will not give the money to Bill Gates) My problem is with the password modification. Every times someone does change his password, he has to go onto the
2006 Oct 10
1
[Follow-UP] samba BDC + LDAP slave Referral errors
hi, i see the same error message with samba 3.0.14a and OpenLDAP 2.2.23 (Debian Packages) with Master/Slave setup. i did not set up a referral to the master, so why does samba get a referral when attempting to write to a slave? is this an in-build samba feature? do i have to enable referrals to get this to work properly? any advise is appreciated! thx! micha Zwonarz Ivo wrote: > We use