similar to: Windows logon doesn't work, Samba says it's fine

I have the exact same problem as this guy: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2006-September/125699.html He describes it much better and in much more detail than I could, so I'll let him speak for me. Unfortunately, I don't have the same solution. nss_ldap is configured properly, and things like 'getent passwd' and 'id machine-acct$' show the machine accounts as

I'm trying to get an LDAP PDC running, and when I try to join a Windows computer to the domain, I get the following error: "The specified domain either does not exist or could not be contacted" That's from Win2K. WinXP gives more information: ------------------------------------------- The domain name NWU_FLUFFY might be a NetBIOS domain name. If this is the case, verify

I recently have upgraded from Samba 2.2.8 to 3.0.7. I am using LDAP as a backend, but I'm running into a problem. Namely, since my user entries have no sambaSID attribute, Samba decides they don't exist. (At least, that's how it looks in the logs, included below.) I've looked through the conversion script that's included with Samba 3, but it just uses the rid attribute,

I've got a Windows XP box that's unable to join my Samba (3.0.20) domain. We've got about 400 other computers, mostly WinXP, that have joined the domain quite successfully. I'm not sure when the most recent one joined, though, but I'm reasonably sure nothing has changed since then. The Samba log gives the following when I try to the computer to the domain: [2006/02/28

I have a small domain with a Samba PDB and two Windows clients. My goal is to have all accounts held centrally on the Linux box, but the administrator login doesn't work as an administrator. That is, I can login just fine as 'administrator' (or as any of the other accounts in the Samba password db), but I don't get administrative privileges in Windows. In smb.conf, I have:

I had a problem similar to my current one a week or so ago, and I was encouraged to upgrade from Samba 2.2.9 to 3.0.7, which I did. Now that I've completed that nightmare, the problem I initially set out to fix is still there, just different. Namely: I am trying to set up Samba 3.0.7 on a SuSE 9.1 box as an LDAP PDC whose only job will be authentication. Our LDAP server is on a separate

I'm trying to get Samba on a Mac OS X box running as a PDC with an LDAP backend. I've read through all of the major walkthroughs I can find, and we've actually already got it running very nicely as a file server; people are currently authenticating against a different PDC and then mapping drives from the Samba box in question. However, I'd like it to be the PDC eventually, but

Dear very helpful friends, It is Sunday, there is no air traffic in Europe, what better to do than try and learn me some more R. I have the following example: owner <- c(1:4) animal <- c("cat", "dog", "cat", "dog") char.1 <- c("fluffy", "playful", "mean", "stupid") food <- c("cat food",

I'm trying to troubleshoot a nasty problem with Samba 2.2.8a that I asked about here a while back, and I need someone with a working LDAP-Samba PDC -- preferably 2.2.8a, ideally running on Mac OS X, but I'll take what I can get -- to post the results of an ldapsearch for one of their machine trust accounts. All I'd need is the results of a command along these lines: ldapsearch -LLL

Is it possible to access the described class in a shared behavior? I''m trying to do something like this: describe "Siberian feline", :shared => true do described_class_instance_as :feline, :name => "fluffy", :breed => "Siberian" # or maybe before(:all) do @feline = described_class.new(:name => "fluffy", :breed =>

Howdy, I was playing around with the malloc/free D script provided by Philip Beevers: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=4224&tstart=15 And decided to change the free:entry probe from: pid24169::free:entry / sz[arg0] / { printf("Freeing %p (size %d)\n", arg0, sz[arg0]); sz[arg0] = 0; } to: pid24169::free:entry / ! sz[arg0] / { printf("[ *

Hello! I'm considering to get Linux on my computer, and do you guys think it would be reasonable easy to start up skyrim at the release date without TOO much work? Does starcraft 2 run easily? Oblivion? and potentially DoTA2? I know it might be difficult to answer about the Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, but since I think you guys know your sh***. I thought you'd might have an idea :) Best

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Alastair Neil <ajneil.tech at gmail.com> wrote: > gluster version 3.10.6, replica 3 volume, daemon is present but does not > appear to be functioning > > peculiar behaviour. If I kill the glusterfs brick daemon and restart > glusterd then the brick becomes available - but one of my other volumes > bricks on the same server goes down in

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We would like to announce the availability of CentOS Linux docker images, via the docker index. =========== Information To use these images, you will need to first install and start the docker service. Documentation about this may be found at http://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/Docker or https://docs.docker.com/installation/centos/ The kickstarts used

"Beast" is more appropriate than you know. It''s definately Frankenstein code. (read: it ain''t pretty, but it works - some of the time). Anyway, it entertains my wife; not sure if hardcore programmers will get anything out of it or not. You might find it interesting (or pointless) that in a complete bastardization of rails'' main reason for being it

Hi everyone, Here's a follow-up on the two BoFs we've had about doing royalty-free codecs at the IETF. Well, the good new is that the proposal is now in IETF last call until January 20th (see below). No final decision has been made, so it's important to get as much support as possible for the Working Group proposal. You can see the ongoing discussion on the mailing list archive:

Hi everyone, Here's a follow-up on the two BoFs we've had about doing royalty-free codecs at the IETF. Well, the good new is that the proposal is now in IETF last call until January 20th (see below). No final decision has been made, so it's important to get as much support as possible for the Working Group proposal. You can see the ongoing discussion on the mailing list archive:

My Rails app needs a decent rich text editor, but nothing out there really seems to do what I want. Looking at the code for these editors, they all seem horrendously browser specific, full of workarounds and multiple methods of doing things. So, I''ve written a proof-of-concept rich text editor, using Prototype, which works through DOM manipulation.

I've got dovecot working on imap But when I try to run imaps I get: imap-login: Nove 08 19:11:19 Warning: SSL_accept() failed: error:1408F455:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:decryption failed or bad record mac [192.168.1.103] Now I'm not sure if theres any difference here, but I don't have string for 'login = imaps' or 'login = pop3s' to match with my protocols string

Samba 3.0.21c, RHEL4. About a week ago, we restarted our Samba server because nmbd had run amok. Since that restart, our Apple clients have periodically disconnected -- by most reports, they disconnect every 15-45 minutes. It doesn't appear to be synchronized, i.e., every Mac on campus doesn't disconnect at once, but only occasionally. They get a message similar to: "A server you