similar to: MultiHomed public/private Problem

Ah....sorry for the last note I meant 3.0.23 NOT 2.0.23 ========================================== M. D. Parker Systems Administrator General Atomics / Electromagnetic Systems +1 858 455 2877 mike.parker@ga.com -----Original Message----- From: M. D. Parker [mailto:mike.parker@ga.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 4:07 PM To: 'samba@lists.samba.org' Subject: Problem using 3.0.23

-----Original Message----- From: M. D. Parker [mailto:mike.parker@ga.com] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 9:02 AM To: 'samba@lists.samba.org' Subject: HELP -- Problem with access list on samba 3.0.23b but not on 3.0.20c PDC I am using samba with NO windbind and a configuration file that has worked for years stopped working at 3.0.23b. The affect was that my [netlogon] area was not being

I have a samba PDC running 2.0.20c I installed Samba 2.0.23 on a client joined to the domain. With this combination, when I attempt to connect to a share on this client from any host even the localhost results in the following: $ smbclient //localhost/atest -U auser Password: Domain=[DOMAIN] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.23-SerNet-RedHat] tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED Windows

I have been using (actually inheareted the system) a file for the Samba password database using since something during the 2.0 erra. New accounts have been successfully added and users are apparently logging in ok. After installing 3.0.6 I am seeing these things in my log (log level=3). mod_smbfilepwd_entry: Using old smbpasswd format. This is no longer supported.! 1. What is the

Hi, This is another attempt to get my gssapi for multi homed systems into openssh. Please find attach a small change so that gssapi authentication works on multihomed systems. Regards Markus -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: openssh-3.8p1-mm.diff Type: application/octet-stream Size: 3599 bytes Desc: not available Url :

Hello, i wrote a simple but useful (i hope) bash script featuring a easly and fastly configuration method for implementing a Linux Gateway feauturing Incoming/Outgoing MultiHomed/LoadBalanced Subsystem Management. I want share this little script. you can download a copy from the following address: http://www.initzero.it/products/opensource/izbalancing/download/izbalancing just save it in your

On 2008-11-14, Conrad Parker <conrad at metadecks.org> wrote: > Should oggz-comment be modified to disallow modification of Dirac > streams, ie. does Ogg Dirac never contain VorbisComment metadata? Correct; there is no metadata handling capability in the current mapping spec. > It seems oggz chop, merge and sort will need some attention to deal > with the Dirac granulepos and

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=928 simon at sxw.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |simon at sxw.org.uk ------- Comment #2 from simon at sxw.org.uk 2006-08-19 08:31 ------- I'd rather see us move towards just using

2008/11/14 David Flynn <davidf+nntp at woaf.net>: > On 2008-11-13, Conrad Parker <conrad at metadecks.org> wrote: >> I'm wondering if the Dirac granulepos parsing in liboggz and display >> in the oggz tools is currently correct, as I'd like to do a release of >> these soon. > > I believe it is -- although if correct support in the rest of the >

You can see by the subject I've got an ugly problem. Even though I don't have a Samba server anywhere near the network in question, nobody understands browsing as well as the folks on the Samba team. :-) Here's the situation: I've got two workgroups, FLINTSTONE and RUBBLE which are on physically separate networks. FLINTSTONE has a Windows 2003 Active Directory domain

Something perhaps noteworth, since this is a multihomed system I bound the transport to 172.31.253.4:5060 I don't *think* that would cause Asterisk to use that IP in the FROM...at least it shouldn't. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of TTT Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2023 2:58 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing

Hi List, I'm wondering if someone can help me get past these errors Joining an ADS Domain, using samba 3.0.14a & kerberos 1.3.5. When I look at the debug output from the join attempt, it almost seems as though The join is looking for an cn or something from the AD that doesn't exist. I'm not an Windows person and the AD admins are not around to help peep this out. Can anyone

I tried that (only needed to add rewrite_contact=yes) but it didn't help. BTW, the CONTACT: line holds the correct ip! Only the FROM: line holds the wrong (private) IP. I'm still learning SIP...but I assume the FROM should also hold the rewritten public IP. Just don't know how to force Asterisk to do that. -----Original Message----- From: Eric Wieling [mailto:ewieling at

Hi there, I just got a new machine with Redhat Enterprise Workstation and samba 3.0.0-14 pre-installed. I am trying to connect it to my existing network which has a redhat v8 samba v2 PDC controlling 16 or so win2k and winxp machines. In the nmbd log I get this error 3 times every 5 seconds or so: nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_nmb_request(1448) process_nmb_request: Multihomed registration

Hello: I am currently planning to divide our network in smaller subnets. Our central server is a Samba AD DC File Server also acting as DC. My plan is subnet our current network, add a new interface for each subnet in the Samba File Server and configure it to listen in all new interfaces. Questions: 1 - Does this multihomed configuration have any drawback, specifically because AD relies

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=928 Summary: Kerberos/GSSAPI authentication does not work with multihomed hosts Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: Other URL: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix- dev&m=108008882620573 OS/Version: All

(was: "Re: Pending OpenSSH release, call for testing", topic drift at its finest :-) Markus Moeller wrote: > Douglas, > > OK three possible settings(hostname,connection IP,GSS_C_NO_NAME) are fine for me too. Does GSS_C_NO_NAME relate to this bug (addressless tickets)? http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488 BTW, I opened a bug the the multihomed thing a couple of

I am not sure if anyone has done this but I am assuming it has been done before. Setting up a multihomed DHCP server accross multiple network blocks to issue PXE/BOOTP setup actions? Some background, I have successfully setup PXE to work with a cross over cable (first setup and testing env.), moved cient/server to switch and configured boot menu, images etc. and now after setting up the

Hello, I'm getting these errors on a samba 2.2.8a wins server in a NT4 network: [2003/11/25 09:41:00, 0] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_multihomed_name_registration_request (1022) wins_process_multihomed_name_registration_request: group name registration request received for name DOMAIN<00> from IP 192.168.10.5 on subnet WINS_SERVER_SUBNET. Errror - group names should not be

Hi all, i''m new at LARTC, and after reading the docs I found no solution to my problem ... On one side I have eth0 conected to the LAN, on the other side I have eth1 conected to a switch and to 3 DSL routers with 3 diferent providers, and also eth2 conected to a cisco 2600 conected to a LDMS line. I have readed the larct docs about multihomed conections to internet, but I''m