similar to: Mac OSX breaking POSIX rights with SMB/CIFS

Hi all, The part that I don’t understand is why the behavior is different when there are ACLs involved. Take the below example: # This share is chmod 777, [share1] path = /srv/share1 # mode is 0777, no ACLs readonly = no create mask = 0660 [share2] path = /srv/share2 # mode is 0770, ACLs readonly = no inherit acts = yes create mask = 0660 share1 acts exactly as expected — I get a 0660

Hi, I have a CentOS 6.4 fileserver running SerNet Samba 4.0.9 with these global settings (not overridden): read only = No force create mode = 0777 force directory mode = 0777 inherit acls = yes inherit owner = yes inherit permissions = yes On a Windows client, I have Thunderbird 24.0 storing its profile and mail on the Samba share. The

I just run webalizer manually on an Apache log, like I have done many times before. Some new statistics were created, but for "August 2006" instead of "August 2008". I cannot figure why! Because of my mistake, the webalizer statistics for this site have not been updated since February. Now I tried to update them for the first time - with the results I described above. The

"Rajesh M" <24x7server at 24x7server.net> writes: > during peak times here are the results for connections > > [root at ns1 domains]# doveadm who |grep imap |wc -l > username # proto (pids) (ips) > 631 > [root at ns1 domains]# doveadm who |grep pop3 |wc -l > username # proto (pids)

Hi, All, I'm having a problem with my samba server(v3.6.9) setup. I have a share on the server: #cd / #mkdir managment #chown -R root:managegroup management #chowm -R 2770 management When I test this I found out: the managegroup member can create new file/dir with the correct permission: -rwxrws--- or drwxrws--- BUT, when the client copy a file or dir to the share from his local drive,

Hi all, I have a Samba share set up using POSIX ACLs as the permissions backend. I am seeing an issue where files created via the Samba get execute permissions whereas files created via shell do not. Here’s my demonstration using “share2” as the root of my share: [root at samba srv]# ls -l total 0 drwxrwx---+ 2 root root 65 Dec 17 18:40 share2 [root at samba srv]# getfacl share2/ # file:

Listmates, In 8 years, since 2.02 (I think), I have never seen this behavior out of samba. I run a stand-alone server with WinXP clients. Somehow a legal assistant created (not intentionally mind you) files and directories with ACL attributes set: -rwxrwx---+ 1 cyndy ochiltree 21504 2008-10-28 16:48 AUTHORIZATION - employment.doc* -rwxrwx---+ 1 cyndy ochiltree 12804 2008-10-28 16:48

On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:52:46 -0400 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Given no responses on this question for a few days, I'm concluding > that we're out of ideas on this problem. Let me propose a couple of > ideas. Apparently, the basic Windows FOLDER and SHARE permissions > are correct according to Louis' recommendations (see message below).

Hai, The docs shown are a bit old, yes, i suggest start reading these. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_POSIX_ACLs Look at the smb.conf man and search for acl ( or exec ) Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens

I am migrating a couple old RH servers running sendmail and UW-IMAP to a new Ubuntu 10.04 servers running Postfix and Dovecot. I have everything working reasonably well except that the permissions of newly created mbox mail folders is always 600. I have reviewed the archives, google, and double checked everything is as suggested in the Dovecot Wiki / SharedMailboxes / Permissions. I am

Hello friends: I hope you can help me with this I'm struggling a year ago After breaking my head migrating a server with Samba Samba 2.1 to 4.1 all stay perfect and functional. All files are in this domain controller for now, and then be moved to a domain member, "the file server". I configure the server as ADDC Samba 4.1 and up here all went well, the shares, the users, winbind,

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Klaus Hartnegg <hartnegg at uni-freiburg.de> wrote: > Not sure which email you mean. I don't think that this can happen. If the > Linux acls are modified, the Windows ACLs are destroyed and all is based on > the Linux permissions and acls (which looks strange when viewed from > Window). If the Windows ACLs are modified, Samba automatically

I've got a share where I needed the permissions to be 770 and I think an Apple Mac computer is connecting to a Samba share and changing the permissions each day. At the end of the day, I'll set permissions to: root at backblaze000002:/share1/QuinceCt/.TemporaryItems# ls -la total 12 drwxrwx--- 3 jlehmanjr qcbbwritetoquincectshare 16 Nov 15 14:57 . drwxrwx--- 9 jlehmanjr

Hi all, Running samba 3.5.5 in a Solaris non-global zone. I have created a folder (StudentJobApplications) on a share which I want to make accessible only to members of a Unix group (studempl). I have added myself to the group but when I or other group members try to access the folder via Windows Explorer I get the following: I:\StudentJobApplications is not accessible Access is denied Here

On 20/03/15 17:32, Jhon P wrote: > I install samba 4.1 from > the sources. In Debian 7.0 "wheezy" > a year ago. > > > > > > Thanks for responding. > > > > > From: patocius at hotmail.com > To: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com > Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba 4.1 gentent, ls, no display domain user name on Primary ACDC but wbinfo -u yes > Date:

Hi, I have a share (testshare) where different unix groups (testgroup1, testgroup2) should have access to. But I want that new files are only created with 660 permissions. Here are the ACL's of testshare: # file: testshare # owner: ralfgro # group: ve user::rwx group::rwx group:testgroup1:rwx group:testgroup2:rwx mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:group::---

On 20/03/15 19:47, Jhon P wrote: > > > Yes im have a file: > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19K Jan 10 2014 libnss_winbind.so.2 > > My pam: > PAM profiles to enable: > ? [*] Unix authentication > ? [*] Winbind NT/Active Directory authentication > ? [ ] ConsoleKit Session Management > ? [ ] Inheritable Capabilities Management > > >>

Imo, this is a left over of an old bug, just remove the file Registry.po imo, i'll bet its never used. The computer looks for Registry.pol not Registry.po. > -rwxrwx--- 1 root users 958 2014-09-13 04:01 Registry.po* > -rwxrwx--- 1 3000000 users 958 2014-09-13 04:01 Registry.pol* Look at the date 2014, and i do remember something about this. But... What does getfacl say about

Hello All. Samba ver 3.0.25b-1.1.cc Simple problem thats happening on two different servers. Samba is a PDC, users are creating files via windows. My goal is to make each and every file rwxrwx--- . They are being created as rwxrw---- The masks on each share is : browseable = yes writeable = yes create mask = 2770 security mask = 2770 directory mask = 2770 directory security mask = 2770

Hi all, I'd appreciate any pointers or advise regarding the following issue with files written by M$ Office on Samba 3.0.32 on snv_98 (OpenSolaris) on a ZFS filesystem: samba share: [sharename] read only = No browseable = yes writeable = yes directory mask = 0770 create mask = 0770 delete readonly = Yes acl check permissions =