similar to: Re: RHEL 3 and MIT kerberos

Thanks, Unfortunately, I still got the same error. I may be wrong, but it is like it does the automatic lookup process of kdc instead of using the krb5.conf file. However, as per my note below, if I do add bad config info to the krb5.conf, it does complain. David David Shapiro Unix Team Lead 919-765-2011 >>> Dimitri Yioulos <dyioulos@firstbhph.com> 2/1/2006 10:15:49 AM

okay, im far from a pam expert, but i don't see any mention of winbind there? It's my weekend at the moment so i can't get to my test box at work to show you my pam module using winbind, but maybe you should check out this page on my website, it's using ldap try and use this and replace any mention of ldap with winbind http://www.yourhowto.org/content/view/35/9/ or i have a

Ok I deleted the incorrect conf file and set it up using Yast again here is the amended file. I tried using the IP address of the server this time but I'm still getting the same errors as before. [libdefaults] default_realm = ELLISONSLEGAL.COM clockskew = 300 [domain_realm] .ELLNET = ELLISONSLEGAL.COM [realms] ELLISONSLEGAL.COM = { kdc = 10.0.0.31 default_domain = ELLNET

Folks, Sincere apologies for asking this again, but I'm just not getting this to work, and must be missing something here: My company's network is based around a Windows 2003 server AD, with several RHEL AS 3 boxes connected to it via samba (3.0.21c-1). ?This scheme works very well. ?I've set up, and have successfully been using a sendmail-based email system, too. My issue is

Hi, all. I'm working on a project to create a Samba PDC with LDAP authentication. I've been pretty successful in getting everything to work. However, I've run into a small snag: The PDC is built on an OpenSuse 11.2 box. Most of the member servers are also OpenSuse 11.2 boxes. However, a CentOS 5.5 server was just added to the mix. While users can lo into the CentOS box,

On Thursday July 13 2006 12:39 pm, you wrote: > Dimitri Yioulos wrote: > > Serious apologies if this has been discussed before, > > but my search didn't turn up much: > > > > I have samba (kept up-to-date with latest) running on > > several CentOS 3 and 4 boxes as part of a Win2k3 > > domain. ?On one particular box, ?winbind dies on > > a regular

Having read a few posts recently I thought I would do some testing. Given XP's use of 445 and that I have a couple of networks where they only have XP clients, I thought I would try setting smb ports to 445 only rather than that suggested of just specifying 139. This has worked well for XP clients with SP2. However SP1, and presumably pre-SP1 clients, lose all sight of the NBT network.

good news, I finally got the asm compilation working with both autotools and project builder. it's all checked in. Brady, can you try it out too? autogen.sh may need a little tweaking depending on your environment. here's what mine looks like (I have some of the required libs in local places in the user acct that I build flac in, and the rest I get from Fink installed in /sw). aclocal

It's primarily for debugging, and I don't see it being used in a high volume environment. What triggered the thought is that I suspect I may have lost the bodies of a couple of messages during an expunge, but because I don't have the previous state of the mbox file, I have no way of verifying my concern, and certainly no way to try and recreate it. And yes, I'm using mbox files,

OK, checked it all in (only minor modifications: I used the existing FLAC routines for allocating aligned memory). on a side note, I got the Project Builder stuff all working again. still have to figure out how to integrate assembly compilation though. Josh --- Brady Patterson <brady@spaceship.com> wrote: > > Here's what I listed in that email. Merging doesn't appear to

On Fri, 27 Mar 1998 samba@samba.anu.edu.au wrote: > Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 09:54:21 -0500 > From: "W.J. McEachran" <billjr@penny.com> > Subject: Re: What shares are mounted on client ? > > On Wed, Mar 25, 1998 at 09:51:07PM -0500, Charlie Brady wrote: > > > WFW can be configured to delay the connect on shares until it is actually > > required. I

finished hooking up the altivec stuff so it works in ProjectBuilder. I ran a test, doing a 'flac -t' on 400MB of files compresses at level 5. the runtime dropped from from 180 sec to 105 sec! once I get the latest autotools on my ibook I'll try and get asm compilation to work that way. Josh --- Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > OK, checked it all in (only minor

Hi. I want to add some code to flac and am having trouble building it out of cvs. I've had several problems, most of which were pretty easy to work around or had already been discussed here. But this one has me stumped (though I am admittedly new to autoconf, automake, and libtool). Here's the problem. autoconf does not see any definition for AC_PROG_LIBTOOL. There is such a

Howdy. I'm working on Altivec versions of some of the libFLAC functions. I figured the best candidates would be those that had MMX/SSE/3dnow versions, and I picked FLAC__lpc_restore_signal() to do first, since it's relatively simple. In stepping through some runs, it appears that 'order' mod 4 is always 0. Is that guaranteed, either by the format or by higher functions in the

--- Brady Patterson <brady@spaceship.com> wrote: > > Brady, I would say for now, your proposal is fine. I am going > > to move flac to getopt soon... > > > > Matt, that would be cool if you wanted to take on the audiofile > > support. I have actually been waiting to ask you for that, > > waiting until I got the getopt support done, and the new > >

In case you cut and paste this, I think Matt meant argv[3] to be --tag=artist=%artist -- Brady Patterson (brady@spaceship.com) Do you know Old Kentucky Shark? On Sun, 25 May 2003, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > flac -o %o --tag=title=%artist --tag=album=%album --tag=title=%song > --tag=tracknumber=%track %f

On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, Conrad Canterford wrote: > I vaguely remember reading a month or so ago (I think in this group) > about someone setting up a Linux firewall box that would allow a Win95 > machine to see the SMB network on the other side of the firewall. I have > SAMBA running and can mount shares on the Linux box. > It is probably really obvious, but I can't see how to do

>From: Charlie Brady <charlieb at e-smith.com> There's something wrong with manually accepting posts from non-subscribed addresses now, they're just left to queue directory for some reason.. Please try to keep the From-address the same as the subscribed one. > >From maildir-storage.c: > > ... > '.', /* hierarchy_sep - can't be changed */ >

Dear All: I am using lmer() {lme4} to analyze results from a reciprocal transplant experiment where the response variable is modeled as a function of two fixed effects and their interaction. Example data follow: #library(lme4) #library(gmodels)

Hi Mike, I wonder if I'm missing the file because I only did a classicupgrade, rather than a provision and perhaps then the file(s) is/are not created. regards, John On 21/08/15 13:45, Brady, Mike wrote: > On 2015-08-21 14:11, Brady, Mike wrote: >> On 2015-08-21 12:52, John Gardeniers wrote: >>> Hi Brady, >>> >>> I realise that but the only named.conf