similar to: SID

Hello All, Your typical problem....I am trying to configure Samba-3.0.2-6.3E on RedHat Linux. I have spent days trying to get this working. What I would like to do is provide the ability to connect to Samba shares from Windows, more specific, WinXP. What I want to avoid is having to manage user accounts on both the Windows or AD side and the Unix side, thus having authentication handled by

Hey All, I have successfully been able to integrate AD authentication into Samba, but today I came across and unusual problem. First I should mention I am using NT ACL support and setting up the ACL's on the Linux box. The problem I have is Samba/Winbind will correctly recognize and authenticate some AD groups I have set up but there a some it will not. The AD groups have been setup as

Having read a few posts recently I thought I would do some testing. Given XP's use of 445 and that I have a couple of networks where they only have XP clients, I thought I would try setting smb ports to 445 only rather than that suggested of just specifying 139. This has worked well for XP clients with SP2. However SP1, and presumably pre-SP1 clients, lose all sight of the NBT network.

Done, thanks. And added a code review here: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2255 -Greg On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Amara Emerson <amara.emerson at arm.com> wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Can you post any patches to the commits list, it'll have a better chance of > some of us seeing it and taking a look there. > > Cheers, > Amara > > -----Original

You can email the list, what url says that? -Chris > On Jan 20, 2015, at 9:31 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: > > Ping > >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: >> I am not a member of the llvm-admin email list and on the description >> of that page it says, "DO NOT MAIL THIS LIST!"

Just curious, what's the reason we don't make the github mirrors the official mirrors? ...besides not knowing how to revive them when they go down. :) -Greg On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Steven Noonan <steven at uplinklabs.net> wrote: > Someone should enable the smart HTTP protocol: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-http-backend.html > > On

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: > > Cool, can you use clang 3.3 then? :) > > I can, but digging deeper I see that the compiler-rt sanitizer tests > depend on just-built-clang for its object instrumentation. The next time > the instrumentation changes, I'd expect those tests to break. If the lit > tests that require

> const uptr kThreadDescriptorSize = FIRST_32_SECOND_64(1168, 2304); Yes, that change causes all tests to pass. > I need to figure out which ifdefs to put this under, so I might not be able to land the fix until Monday. Okay, no worries, thanks for doing this. I've moved over to release_33 for the short-term. With the one change mentioned earlier (#include <stdint.h>), asan

As a temporary fix, you can replace this line in sanitizer_linux_libcdep.c: const uptr kThreadDescriptorSize = FIRST_32_SECOND_64(1216, 2304); with const uptr kThreadDescriptorSize = FIRST_32_SECOND_64(1168, 2304); The tests should pass after that. I need to figure out which ifdefs to put this under, so I might not be able to land the fix until Monday. On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Greg

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: > For me, UBsan fails with clang 3.2 and passes with clang 3.3. > Cool, can you use clang 3.3 then? :) I think that the reason selected UBSan tests fail under clang 3.2 is a bug in Clang, which was fixed (Richard may correct me if I'm wrong). I don't really want to mark these tests as "failing

Investment Times Alert Issues: (STRONG BUY) We Told last week at 1.20 to WATCH and now its $2.35 and we think it goes to $4.00 on expected news this week... Harbin Pingchuan Pharmaceutical: (PGCN) Current Price: $2.35 Shares Outstanding: 20 Million Market Capitalization: $6 Million Short Term Target: $5.75 12month Target: $10.00 (!!!) ***We told you there was going to be a BIG move on

> Android runtime is special, we build it in a separate build tree configured with > -DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE=$LLVM_CHECKOUT/cmake/platforms/Android.cmake This worked great, thanks! Would you mind tweaking Android.cmake so that I can override the location of the C compiler? The current version forces me to use the just-built-clang and that the new build directory be in a sibling directory.

UBsan tests work for me when I run "check-ubsan" in both build trees (the one with gcc 4.6.3 as a host compiler, and the one with fresh Clang). It's pretty convenient for us to use fresh Clang to configure LLVM and compiler-rt. One major reason is that autoconf/make build system always builds compiler-rt with just-built Clang. There are other benefits, like keeping sanitizers code

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:04 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: > > we would still want to use compiler-rt test-suite in a standalone mode, > to test fully built/installed toolchains, > and even GCC. > > Sounds good. > > > > Clang driver links the static xsan runtimes from a hardcoded > > paths in Clang resource directory, and doesn't

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: > > it assumes that compiler-rt is checked out to > > llvm/projects/compiler-rt. Apparently, this is a problem. > > I have a patch for this ready. I'll send it to you and llvm-commits. > Most of the tests pass with "make check-all" but the recently-added lsan > tests are

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: > > What is the exact line you use to configure build tree, and the output > you see? > > cmake ../.. \ > -G Ninja \ > -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=ship \ > -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \ > -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=ON \ > -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=ARM \ >

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: >> Not that I know of, and I always build compiler-rt natively, together with Clang and LLVM. :( > > Do you mean "natively on ARM" or "natively on X86 with the ARM target enabled"? > > If the former, do you have a script to merge the target libs into the > host's

Hello, Last evening I did this recursive rsync: rsync -avz data /mnt/RICEX0/DWT/Daredevil/1071865403/ ..where data is a regular ext3 soft-RAID1 volume ...where /mnt/RICEX0/ is an NTFS hard-RAID10 volume mounted across VPN using SMB. And received errors that look to be generated by smb while trying to recreate(?) the illegal characters. Dec 20 04:30:55 daredevil kernel: smb_create:

Breaking News Alert Emerson Oi| and Gas, Inc. (0TC-E O G I) Domestic 0i| and Gas Stock Trending Up the Last Few Weeks Current Price: $.2O EOGI Has Been Moving Up Since it Bottomed at $.135 on December 30th. Wil| it Continue Higher? Watch This One Thursday as We Know Many of You Like Momentum.. Reasons to Consider "E O G I" (Source: Recent News Announcements) *Emerson 0il and Gas,

> First of all, sorry for the late response (I'm in the process of moving to California). Welcome! > We need to verify that simple command "clang -fsanitize=address foo.cc" works Agreed. The test suite is useful in many different scenarios: 1) Verifying the integrated clang. 2) Verifying the integrated gcc. 3) Verifying the libraries during development. I'm working