similar to: problem with file transfer under samba

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0410 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0410.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: af13fa8c2f29582db0652b17aee4a916563f02a011ec90e20c5c385255c4b136 raptor-1.4.18-5.el6_2.1.i686.rpm

Hi, I'm trying to setup a Server only for Subnet Browsing. The smb.conf on the server looks like: [global] workgroup = some.work.group server string = hosts allow = 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.3.0/24 192.168.3.0/24 hosts deny = 0.0.0.0/0 interfaces = eth1 eth1:1 eth1:2 eth1:3 eth1:4 bind interfaces only = yes wins support = yes domain

Hi, I''m trying to make a shaper / firewall to improve sharing of bandwidth on a ADSL (3mbit down / ½ mbit up) Since the ADSL is very asymmetric, down is unimportant, I make a ingress rate limit shaper to ensure, all shaping is at the Shaper, and not on the Router or the ISP. The Idea is then to make one HTB hierarchy and have each client (IP) filtererd and put in a child-HTB queue.

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84721 --- Comment #14 from Krzysztof Katowicz-Kowalewski <vnd at vndh.net> --- After 7 tries... here's the culprit: localhost linux # git bisect good 0e994d645627bb67088ae4860e9a0295b123f7b0 is the first bad commit commit 0e994d645627bb67088ae4860e9a0295b123f7b0 Author: Martin Peres <martin.peres at labri.fr> Date: Wed Feb 19

> Message: 8 > Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 21:49:49 +0200 > From: raptor <raptor@tvskat.net> > To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > Subject: [LARTC] [tcng] X:Y to tcng corespondence ! > > Is there a easy way that I to get class-id<----->tcng-class-path conversation.... and vs. versa.. > > --__--__-- There are couple files can be created by tcc: # cat a.tc dev

FYI On the ISN vulnerability I found a really good article on Initial Sequence Numbers (ISN) vulnerability and according to this article all Linux Kernels after 1996 are not affected by this vulnerability. http://www.linuxsecurity.com/articles/security_sources_article-2968.html I found another article that stated : Operating systems that have been reported to be safe from practical attacks

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2783 Summary: Random high loads during syncs (server side) / client stream errors Product: rsync Version: 2.6.4 Platform: All URL: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83254 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3

Hello Everyone, I have 2 different suggestions about syn-cookies method which is used to block syn-flood attacks. Syn cookies bitwise image --------------------------------------------- T(5 bits) ---MSS(3 bits)-----H(24 bits) --------------------------------------------- So, 1- T value can be decreased to 2 bit which is already 5 bit.And hash value will be 27 bit. 2-Normally syn-cookies is

Hi *Problem *- I'm running Icecast in a VM container on OpenVZ. Syslog on the hardware node (HN) shows these error messages: Jan 23 18:43:05 HN kernel: [27469893.430615] possible SYN flooding on port 8000. Sending cookies. Jan 23 21:37:40 HN kernel: [27480362.817944] possible SYN flooding on port 8000. Sending cookies. Jan 23 23:43:50 HN kernel: [27487929.582025] possible SYN flooding on

Near the end of section 15.10, the following commands are shown for prioritizing SYN packets: iptables -t mangle -I PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST,ACK SYN -j MARK --set-mark 0x1 iptables -t mangle -I PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST,ACK SYN -j RETURN Shouldn''t the "-I" option really be "-A"? Like so: iptables -t mangle -A

Hi, sorry to bother you, and that this is probably not the right list :-), but I read that some of you might use syn as Editor for .R files. I've released an unofficial Version of the syn Text Editor with improved support for R (I'm the initial developer of this program, btw.). syn is a Windows 32 Program (Win9x, NT4, 2000), but maybe it runs also inside Wine, I didn't try it.

Hi, I''ve been developing a peer-to-peer application, and have recently been trying to add STUNT (http://www.cis.nctu.edu.tw/~gis87577/xDreaming/XSTUNT/Docs/XSTUNT%20Ref erence.htm) to allow firewall/NAT traversal. I got a box with Shorewall to use for testing, and am now trying to work out whether Shorewall is actually designed to prevent such connections? I notice in the FAQs that

Dear users, I am attempting to plot an ols() call from the Design package, by following the procedure explained by Harald Baayen in his 2008 book 'Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R', page 175-181. I've attached my data to this e-mail (I hope it's small enough that that's ok). First I paste all the commands I ran, followed by the

My dcgui-qt (chat/file-sharing program) doesn''t work and I''m pretty sure it''s my firewall settings. dcgui-qt is a direct connect (file sharing & chat) client. According to the FAQ here (http://dcplusplus.sourceforge.net/faq/faq.php) all I should need to do is: ------- #ACTION SOURCE DEST PROTO DEST SOURCE ORIGINAL #

Last week, I started seeing very strange behavior in one of the networks that I manage. The office LAN uses a Linux firewall which masquerades their workstations over their DSL connection. There are probably ~75 workstations in the office LAN. Their mail server is in a collocated facility nearby. That server has an RFC1918 address; its router does SNAT to forward packets to the system. Both

At the current time I am not subscribed to the mailing list. I have a blacklist that I got from www.peerguardian.net that is rather large ( 81 kb). When shorewall start command is issued it takes about 20 mins for it to load. Is this normal or should I do this another way? Also I noticed something very strange with shorewall .. I have cron do a shorewall restart command every 24 hours and

Perhaps someone will help me on this :- I have read a lot of examples of syn flood protect on the INPUT chain. That I have no question at all. I wonder if it make sense to perform syn flood protection at the FORWARD chain ? If packets are originated from a LAN worm, and are not targetted at the firewall itself, but rather at hosts in the internet, will it cause problem with the firewall itself,

27.08.2015, 16:09, "Eugene Paskevich" <eugene at raptor.kiev.ua>: > Hello, > > I'm using the Debian builds of dovecot-2.2 by S[r]us. > Today I started getting the following panic: > > log: Panic: file priorityq.c: line 122 (priorityq_remove_idx): assertion > failed: (idx < count) Just in case, here is the full backtrace. (gdb) thread apply all bt full

Here's the output: Feb 9 15:51:26 SSI001 kernel: SFW2-INext-ACC-TCP IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:0f:ea:73:88:12:00:40:2b:67:5b:a7:08:00 SRC=192.168.1.54 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=128 ID=51248 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=1964 DPT=139 WINDOW=65535 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 OPT (020405B401010402) Feb 9 15:51:28 SSI001 kernel: SFW2-INext-ACC-TCP IN=eth0 OUT=