similar to: Username in "admin users" is not eq root

Hello I see, that "enable asu support = no: is available and I can point ADMIN$ wherever I want. I just want ask if this setting will not have any other impact to my current services (Samba installation is ADS membership). Can you provide more detailed explanation of "enable asu support = no" impact ? Thank you ! With best regards Martynas -----Original Message----- From:

Hello What is sequence for "auth methods" running in ADS mode ? How I can find this ? With best regards Martynas

Hello I have Samba running as AD member. In addition there is a support of quest user connections to shares, that allow guest connections to shares, where access is restricted on IP addresses base. Problem is, that Administrator is not mapped to guest, because Administrator in AD domain is locked. Samba gets respond NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT and denies connection. While computers, that are

Hello I have Samba that joined Windows 2003 based ADS. At least "net ads testjoin" and "net rpc testjoin" gives that "Join is OK". Alas clients can't connect to Samba server. In a log I see following messages : [2005/04/08 14:51:41, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:(725) tdb(/web/opt/etc/smbprivate//secrets.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 2 ltype=2 (Resource temporarily

Hello Is it possible to make ADMIN$ share (Samba 3.0.14a) world writeable and pointing to specific directory ? I am interested in building some sort of honey pot that would allow virus to transfer files to ADMIN$ under putting mode logging around. Any other solutions with samba ? Martynas

Hello I decided to test password migration (on Solaris 8 box with SUNWspro C) and built samba with pam_smbpass module : CC=cc ./configure --prefix=/opt/local/samba --with-acl-support --with-pam --with-pam_smbpass Then installed bin/pam_smbpass.so in /usr/lib/security : # ls -al /usr/lib/security/pam_smbpass.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root sys 2091380 Oct 23 11:01

Hello I want use stand alone samba server 3.0.0 on Solaris 8 box. We have users configure locally, but authentication is done via Kerberos server. I expected to deal with samba installation quite easy, but got stuck. As I understood from documentation - there are two ways how to do that : 1. Install pam authentication. Well this works fine from samba side. Alias - it requires password

Hello I have samba 3.0.13 running in ADS mode. For some specific reason I want to disable winbindd authentication while I want winbindd keep running. If I understood right - option "auth methods" would help to do that. But I am not sure if this will not break existing services : auth methods = guest sam All users that authenticate are created locally in /etc/passwd file. Can anybody

On 08 Dec 2019, at 05:58, @lbutlr <kremels at kreme.com> wrote: > On 06 Dec 2019, at 16:28, Martynas Bendorius <martynas at martynas.it> wrote: >> when zlib compression is enabled in dovecot, old emails remain untouched > > I?ve been considering doing this, or at least looking into how much space we?d save (answer so far, less than you might think), but I am hesitant to

Hello, I would like to change my courier to dovecot. When I try to setup ldap auth, I get error: dovecot-auth: ldap(martynas): Unknown password scheme SHA So, how enable SHA scheme on dovecot? regards, Martynas

Hello Is it possible to get information when next official Samba release (> 3.0.14a) will be published ? Thank you very much for information. With best regards Martynas

Hello, Maildirlock seems to panic on locking: [root at centos7 home]# /usr/libexec/dovecot/maildirlock "/home/user/imap/domain.com/email/Maildir" 10 Panic: BUG: No IOs or timeouts set. Not waiting for infinity. Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0xd90ee) [0x7f5bf02f10ee] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0xd9131) [0x7f5bf02f1131] ->

Hello I need some advice from gurus. I identified several Windows NT computers, that are persistently trying to access my samba server. They are connecting to IPC$ with NULL information both in password and username fields. Below you will find excerpt from samba log file. My questions would be following. What is SPOOLSS_ADDPRINTEREX ? Can it be some kind of worm ? If yes, how I can catch it

Hello, Aki created this patch a while ago: http://files1.directadmin.com/services/custombuild/patches/maildirlock-crash.patch It works perfectly to fix the issue :) Regarding dsync - I don't think it's a good replacement in all the cases, is it? We use maildirlock extensively for compression of email folders (when zlib compression is enabled in dovecot, old emails remain untouched). --

Hello, Is there any ETA set for JMAP support? Thank you! >> On 11/27/2016 5:28 AM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: >> Hi! >> We are working on including JMAP support to Dovecot. At this moment I cannot give any promise for exact version, but hopefully it will be part of v2.3 >> >> Aki Tuomi >> Dovecot Oy -- Best regards, Martynas Bendorius

Dovecot 2.3.2 still has the same issue we reported for 2.3.X: Jul 05 15:10:49 lmtp(2730445): Panic: file lib-event.c: line 182 (event_pop_global): assertion failed: (event != NULL) Jul 05 15:10:49 lmtp(2730445): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0xce054) [0x7f7f7c92f054] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(default_fatal_handler+0x2a) [0x7f7f7c92f09a] ->

Doesn't it currently confuse them? Because they'd reach their quota, while actually there would be a lot of disk space left :) + their whole mailbox could take a lot more space due to indexes and other files in the filesystem, and quota would not be reached. Also, I've dovecot is using fstat's st_size parameter. This is not "correct", in that the actual space used on

Este no es el correo de Yanier ----- Original Message ----- From: <samba-request@lists.samba.org> To: <samba@lists.samba.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 2:02 PM Subject: samba Digest, Vol 29, Issue 13 > Send samba mailing list submissions to > samba@lists.samba.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >

Hello I have a question about running two SMBD daemons on one host. Background for this request is Samba failover in parallel services mode. The actual requirement is to start Samba processes bind to specific IP address. This can be done by specifying following parameters in smb.conf file : interfaces = 192.168.100.1/24 bind interfaces only = yes But nmbd process always is

Hello, Is there any reason why dovecot relies on S= instead of real disk size email takes? 1) compressed mails take less than than the S= specified 2) we could avoid using "S=" for the lookups and count every file there, including indexes and mails without S=... if we'd read filesizes Eample: # ls -l '1567026317.M331058P4751.testing.server.com,S=3086,W=3148:2,S' -rw-------