similar to: Read-only and POSIX ACLs

Sparc Solaris / UFS file system. I have some ACL's set up for a handful of users and its all worked flawlessly with every incarnation of Samba I've used over the past couple years, which would be most. Last Friday evening I upgraded from 3.0.11 to 3.0.13 and some of the users I have some ACL's set up for promptly found Monday that they couldn't save new Excel files, they'd be

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeremy Allison" <jra at samba.org> > To: "Nick E Couchman" <nick.couchman at seakr.com> > Cc: samba at lists.samba.org > Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 1:22:06 PM > Subject: Re: [Samba] Linux & NFSv4 ACLs > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 07:31:36PM -0700, Nick Couchman wrote: >> >> Try these pages (U

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:20:47AM -0500, Sergei Gerasenko via samba wrote: > It looks like this is a long known issue: > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10792 If by long known you mean "as designed". As Samba supports ACL setting on files/directories we don't restrict what happens to them after creation. For creation you can set "create mask" and

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 07:27:00PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > > > Am 12.08.2016 um 18:57 schrieb Jeremy Allison via samba: > >On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:20:47AM -0500, Sergei Gerasenko via samba wrote: > >>It looks like this is a long known issue: > >> > >>https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10792 > > > >If by long known

On 17/11/16 13:15, Reinald Gfuellner via samba wrote: > I try to set up a Samba4-based Fileserver in an Samba3-DC enviroment. > Filesystem is ext4, CIFS + NFS4 should be provided. The same ACLs should > be used over both protocols. > > With Samba 3 this was possible (using POSIX 1003.1e DRAFT 17 ACLs only) > . How can I do the same with Samba 4 ? > > Posix-ACLs set on

Hi! I am experiencing troubles concerning the inheritance of the setgid bit if a new mailbox is created with dovecot-lda. If it is created with dovecot/imap, everything works fine. dovecot-lda is called from postfix like this: ---------- mailbox_command = /usr/local/sbin/postfix-lda.sh ---------- logger -p mail.info -t postfix-lda "H: $HOME, S: $SENDER, R: $RECIPIENT, U: $(umask), id:

Hi all, I've been spending some time with customers lately and I've discovered an interesting thing. Many IT departments completely delegate the settings on directory and file ACLs to the users who are interested in the data. For example, on a given share for "Finance", the finance group is given full control on the containing directory (ie. they're allowed to set ACLs on

I try to set up a Samba4-based Fileserver in an Samba3-DC enviroment. Filesystem is ext4, CIFS + NFS4 should be provided. The same ACLs should be used over both protocols. With Samba 3 this was possible (using POSIX 1003.1e DRAFT 17 ACLs only) . How can I do the same with Samba 4 ? Posix-ACLs set on the server with setfacl are recogniced on a windows-client. But every change I do on a

Hi, I've a samba 3.0.24 server running in a debian "alike" OS with a (Open)LDAP backend and I'm having the following problem: I have LDAP users that belong to more than one (POSIX) group. For instance, I have a user2 that belongs to group "users" and "grupo2" and I have a share with the following ACL settings: getfacl /home/shares/share1/ getfacl: Removing

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 10:51:41AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 21:45 +0100, Matthias Leopold via samba wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I posted a similar question in 2018 with no answers, so I'll try > > again: > > Is it possible to have shares with Windows ACLs and shares with > > POSIX > > ACLs on the same server

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeremy Allison" <jra at samba.org> > To: "Nick E Couchman" <nick.couchman at seakr.com> > Cc: samba at lists.samba.org > Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 6:13:51 PM > Subject: Re: [Samba] Linux & NFSv4 ACLs > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:03:39PM -0700, Nick Couchman wrote: >> >> > On Dec 3,

I'm looking for info on using posix acls in samba. I'd like them to look and feel like nt acls. I'd like to use the windows client to set the acls on the samba server. I've got the official samba 3 howto book, but can't seem to figure things out from there. specifically, in the past I've used a force group entry in combined with create modes to keep shared files access to

Hello Rsync open source community, We are in the process of the data migration from RHEL NFS Server into NetApp using "rsync 3.1.3 with -XAavzHP -inplace --filter= '-x system.posix_acl' /source_NFSv4 /destination_NFSv4 " options : Current NFS Exports have legacy POSIX ACLs applied on some files, the reason we are using "-XA" is because we also have NFS v4 ACLs

Hello samba team ! On my network, I mainly manage my AD users and computers from Unix using shell scripts. So I would like to set the shares' ACLs directly from the DC with the POSIX setfacl command. When exporting with NFSv4, the POSIX ACLs are conserved. I can set the permissions the same manner as for my local users. But on DC, the "rwx" right is mapped to "full

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 3:41 PM Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > Weren't you getting a NT_STATUS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED level > error return ? > > Look for the specific error return you see on the WinCE > client in the trace. Figured out the issue... After comparing a good vs bad file copy in wireshark for a while, I have found where it goes wrong. On the good copy I

Hi all Samba OS/2 users. I've just added OS/2 style extended attribute support into the SAMBA_3_0 subversion branch code. This depends on the underlying OS supporting EA's and (on linux) the filesystem being mounted with the "user_xattr" mount option and the parameter "ea support = yes" being set in smb.conf. Please check out this code and test it - let me know if

Hi list, i'm using Samba 3.0.14a as standalone-pdc with posix-acl-features. On the fileserver i've mounted an ext3 partition to /home /dev/hdc2 /home type ext3 (rw,usrquota,acl) The following directory structur exists on /home /home +-/public_folder (exported per samba as \\fileserver\public ) | +-/a | +-/a_ann | | +-/anyfolder | | +- anyfiles | +-/a_bert | +-/a_sven | +-/a_eve |

Is anyone looking at supporting the POSIX extended ACLs? Thanks! Trevor

Hi all, we are experiencing difficulties with posix ACLs using samba 3.0.28 on a Debian 4.0 etch server. The goal is to not let the Windows clients manage the ACLs but instead set the permissions from the Samba server, hence smb.conf says "nt acl support = no". Problems arise when I have a directory with default permissions for a named group, e.g. # file: ACLTest # owner: juergen #

We currently set sb->s_flags |= MS_POSIXACL unconditionally, which is incorrect -- it tells the VFS that it shouldn''t set umask because we will, yet we don''t set it ourselves if we aren''t using POSIX ACLs, so the umask ends up ignored. Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> --- fs/btrfs/super.c | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)