similar to: Samba-3 By Example, Example 2.4

I've still not quite got things right. I'm running FC3 with Samba v 3.0.14a, and I'm trying to implement Example 2.4 from JHT's 2004 ed. of Samba-3 by Example. I have lserver1 as my Linux box and jupiter (user annlee) and mustelidae (ehines) as Win2k boxes. ehines has access to his share (path /archive/ehines (/archive/%U in smb.conf)), but annlee does not to her share

I have a 2Win2k, 1Linux (server) LAN; the server is running FC3 and Samba 3.0.14a. I am unable to get both users access to their individual shares. Essentially, I'm working through the Accounting Office example (pgs 31-35) of John Terpstra's 2004 Samba-3 By Example, and I'm doing something foolish and wrong on a basic level. I can get access to, and manipulate the files in, my

Further on this. I just ran an ethereal trace on an attempt to ping lserver1 from lserver1, and it appears that my DNS isn't staying local at all, but I have no idea what's gone wrong (other than my /etc/resolv.conf file). The trace (I'd include the relevant parts, but I can't get it to save anything in textual form) had lserver1.test.biz going out through the

One more thing I forgot to mention. The chapter calls for editing /etc/resolv.conf, but in my case it won't stay edited--it keeps getting set back to an original form (for searching my ISP) on every reboot. Thanks again. Eric Hines -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Samba-3 By Ex Chapt 3 Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 17:47:09 -0500 From: Eric Hines <eehines@comcast.net> To:

OK, I've got this one working, but only by enumerating the valid users in the "files" share--%S wouldn't work in the valid users field (e.g., "smbclient //<servername>/files" would simply give an NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED error). This would be OK for a small LAN, but for small enterprises or LANs with 75-100 users, as some on this list have mentioned, that

I'm running SUSE 9.3 with Samba 3.0.21a, but I can't connect to some shares, even though I can connect to others just fine. I get into my home share, netlogon share, printer shares, etc, but three shares all get me the same answer in response to <smbclient -L //server/share>: I get back an NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME error. All users are correctly in passdb, passwd, etc. I have

Folks, I'm having a problem connecting to some shares, and not to others. I'm running SUSE 9.3 and Samba 3.0.22pre1 with a Win2k PC on one subnet and an XP laptop on a separate subnet. The problem is that with three shares out of eight, I get a "tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME" error message; I get appropriate accesses to the remaining five. Googling the

>Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 21:39:28 -0600 >To: Craig White <craigwhite@azapple.com> >From: Eric Hines <eehines@comcast.net> >Subject: Re: [Samba] Basic Setup Problem > ><snip> >> > >> > 1) your point is valid about the password; I was following the example >> > as exactly as I could. >> > 2) there is no difference between

I'm at my wit's end on this, and I hope someone can help. I'm running SUSE Pro 9.3 with Samba 3.0.13, and I can't get connected to my shares properly. Valid users (e.g., for [accounts]) is set to %G, and I've confirmed that the users are members of the owning groups for the shares and that they are in the passwd and smbpasswd files with the same passwords as on the Win2k

Sorry for the direct post.... Eric Hines -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Samba] can't connect to swat Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 08:51:45 -0500 From: EHines <eehines@comcast.net> To: Larry Weldon <lweldon@weldoncomputers.com> References: <02a201c66148$c8925290$0c46a8c0@jshinotebook> <1145194206.20034.72.camel@tiger.home.welcoin.com> Larry Weldon

Hi! All: How can i get domain members of a domain group? I tried getent group, but only get the gid infomation. There isn't member infomation at the last field as local group is. Thanks for your help. Best, LatrellFrom eehines at comcast.net Fri Dec 9 01:43:02 2005 From: eehines at comcast.net (Eric Hines) Date: Fri Dec 9 01:34:48 2005 Subject: [Samba] netlogon problems In-Reply-To:

Folks, This is a strange problem, and I'm not sure this is the right place for it, so feel free point me to a better location. I'm running FC3 and Samba 3.0.14a. The problem is this: when I boot up my Linux box, and it gets to the point of turning on my NIC (eth0), where the PC used to turn it right on and continue, now there's an inordinately long delay in getting eth0 to

Folks, I'm running a Samba server (SUSE 9.3 and Samba 3.0.22pre1) on a 2-subnet LAN, with a Win2k PC on one subnet and an XP laptop on the other. When I boot up the server and then the two windows devices at the start of a day, everything comes up just fine, the server appears in Network Neighborhood and in Explorer, and I have access to my shares normally. However, my problem is this:

Hi, I've had a stable Samba-run LAN, with some active shares, for several months, with my PC and laptop also gaining access to the Internet through the Samba server. However, this morning, when I booted up my Samba server, I had no LAN--neither my PC nor my laptop could connect to any share. However, both still had access to the Internet. I confirmed that smb, named, winbindd, et al.,

Hi, I am having the same problem. Did you figure out how to do this? Any help in how to remove stale WINS entries from Samba would be greatly appreciated. Cheers, -farshad

Funny you should post this now. I was just cleaning up some DNS records and the following happend. I had to PTR records with an empty timestamp. I deleted them and wanted to recreate them. My reverse Zones are 0.168.192.in-addr.arpa and 2.168.192.in-addr.arpa both of the records I delted were in the "0" zone. The first i recreated with: samba-tool dns add dc1

'K, not sure how/what to debug here ... doing a grep of svr1.postgresql.org in /proc/*/status shows all the processes 'stuck' in inode ... /proc/38750/status:inetd 38750 2072 2072 2072 -1,-1 noflags 1055120147,191009 0,0 0,592 inode 0 0 0,0,0,2,3,4,5,20,31 svr1.postgresql.org /proc/38752/status:inetd 38752 2072 2072 2072 -1,-1 noflags 1055120154,886433 0,0 0,637 inode 0 0

Hi All, I use Ubuntu server 10.04 LTS as virtualization platform. Actually running kernel 2.6.32-31-server #61-Ubuntu S root at jupiter:~# uname -a Linux jupiter 2.6.32-31-server #61-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 8 19:44:42 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux We have on running virtual root at jupiter:~# virsh list --all Id Name State ---------------------------------- 1 kvmtik.4safety.cz

hi again. after some tests, (on my operational domain and on a new testdomain) i detected this behavior: on samba 4.11.6 sometimes the new DNS-records finisches on a wrong dns zone. the problem occurs, if more then 5 records are created with the same name in more then one domain zone for example: testa1.jupiter.mydom.org testa2.jupiter.mydom.org testa3.jupiter.mydom.org

Am 03.12.2013 17:36, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > > On a gentoo server with libvirt-1.1.3 I get problems with starting VMs. Additional logs: # journalctl -f lists Dec 03 18:19:31 jupiter systemd-machined[23995]: Failed to start machine scope: Method "StartTransientUnit" with signature "ssa(sv)" on interface "org.freedeskt...sn't exist Dec 03 18:19:31