Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "Bug? (Or bug in du?)"
2007 Mar 29
0
Re: Nut-upsdev Digest, Vol 21, Issue 25
please tell me how i can use the hyperterminal to calibiration of my ups sua 1000VA.
nut-upsdev-request@lists.alioth.debian.org wrote:
Send Nut-upsdev mailing list submissions to
nut-upsdev@lists.alioth.debian.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body
2007 Jun 04
1
mime-type change?
I have a recently (last Friday) updated CentOS 4.5 desktop running OOo 2.2
that, since this morning, displays OpenOffice .odt files as
application:x-java-archives and has replaced the open office icon on my
desktop with the java icon for these files. I have looked in both:
/usr/share/mime-info/gnome-vfs.mime
and
/usr/share/mime-info/file-roller.mime
And cannot see any reference to OpenOffice
2007 Mar 27
4
NUT-2.0.5: newhidups on RedHat ES4
Hello everybody,
After succeeded in "tuning" nut-2.0.0's hidups and 2.0.3's newhidups on
customized Linux kernels, we are now facing a new challenge : trying to
install nut-2.0.5 on a RedHat ES4 which is based on a 2.6.9 kernel.
I picked up the 2.0.5 source package and follow the INSTALL doc until step
6. So far so good.
RH ES4 is managed by udev, therefore I presume we
2016 Nov 09
0
[PATCH] filearch: Add s390 and s390x detection and tests.
Unfortunately I was unable to build s390 binaries since multilib was
dropped in Fedora 24 on s390x. Going from the source of the 'file'
command it seems as if it prints "32-bit" (the architecture is really
31 bit).
---
generator/actions.ml | 12 ++++++++++++
src/filearch.c | 10 ++++++++++
test-data/Makefile.am | 2 ++
2011 Sep 02
0
Copying data failed on distributed replicated volume (ver. 3.1.3)
Hi,
I am trying to backup data from a distributed replicated volume.
The volume was built from 6 units of 2 TB hard disks:
gluster> volume info
Volume Name: 6TB-Vol
Type: Distributed-Replicate
Status: Started
Number of Bricks: 3 x 2 = 6
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: c107:/exp0
Brick2: c108:/exp0
Brick3: c109:/exp0
Brick4: c110:/exp0
Brick5: c111:/exp0
Brick6: c112:/exp0
Options
2006 Jun 26
2
raidz2 is alive!
Already making use of it, thank you!
http://www.justinconover.com/blog/?p=17
I took 6x250gb disk and tried raidz2/raidz/none
# zpool create zfs raidz2 c0d0 c1d0 c2d0 c3d0 c7d0 c8d0
df -h zfs
Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on
zfs 915G 49K 915G 1% /zfs
# zpool destroy -f zfs
Plain old raidz (raid-5ish)
# zpool create zfs raidz c0d0
2015 Jun 28
0
Anyone else think the latest Xorg fix is hogging stuff?
On 06/27/15 17:05, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
> Since the latest update (may wrap here),
> xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64 Sat 20 Jun 2015
> 04:16:01 PM EDT
> xorg-x11-server-common-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64 Sat 20 Jun 2015
> 04:15:58 PM EDT
> x264-0.0.0-0.4.20101111.el6.rf.x86_64 Wed 19 Nov 2014 04:56:05
> PM EST
>
2013 Mar 16
1
different size of nodes
hi All,
There is a distributed cluster with 5 bricks:
gl0
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda4 5.5T 4.1T 1.5T 75% /mnt/brick1
gl1
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda4 5.5T 4.3T 1.3T 78% /mnt/brick1
gl2
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda4 5.5T 4.1T 1.4T 76% /mnt/brick1
gl3
Filesystem Size Used
2010 Jan 05
4
Software RAID1 Disk I/O
I just installed CentOS 5.4 64 bit release on a 1.9ghz CPU with 8gB of
RAM. It has 2 Western Digital 1.5TB SATA2 drives in RAID1.
[root at server ~]# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/md2 1.4T 1.4G 1.3T 1% /
/dev/md0 99M 19M 76M 20% /boot
tmpfs 4.0G 0 4.0G 0% /dev/shm
[root at server ~]#
Its barebones
2009 Nov 04
1
ZFS non-zero checksum and permanent error with deleted file
Hello,
I am actually using ZFS under FreeBSD, but maybe someone over here can
help me anyway. I''d like some advice if I still can rely on one of my
ZFS pools:
[user at host ~]$ sudo zpool clear zpool01
...
[user at host ~]$ sudo zpool scrub zpool01
...
[user at host ~]$ sudo zpool status -v zpool01
pool: zpool01
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has experienced an
2013 Feb 12
2
Lost folders after changing MDS
OK, so our old MDS had hardware issues so I configured a new MGS / MDS on a VM (this is a backup lustre filesystem and I wanted to separate the MGS / MDS from OSS of the previous), and then did this:
For example:
mount -t ldiskfs /dev/old /mnt/ost_old
mount -t ldiskfs /dev/new /mnt/ost_new
rsync -aSv /mnt/ost_old/ /mnt/ost_new
# note trailing slash on ost_old/
If you are unable to connect both
2013 Oct 08
0
CentOS 6.4: Warning! Received an indication that the LUN assignments on this target have changed. The Linux SCSI layer does not automatically remap LUN assignments.
All:
~> uname -srvmpio
Linux 2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Aug 28 17:19:38 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
~> rpm -qa kernel\* | sort
kernel-2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.x86_64
kernel-2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64
kernel-devel-2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.x86_64
kernel-devel-2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.noarch
kernel-headers-2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.x86_64
My department has
2015 Jun 27
3
Anyone else think the latest Xorg fix is hogging stuff?
Since the latest update (may wrap here),
xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64 Sat 20 Jun 2015
04:16:01 PM EDT
xorg-x11-server-common-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64 Sat 20 Jun 2015
04:15:58 PM EDT
x264-0.0.0-0.4.20101111.el6.rf.x86_64 Wed 19 Nov 2014 04:56:05
PM EST
xvidcore-1.2.2-1.el6.rf.x86_64 Wed 19 Nov 2014 04:55:49
PM EST
.
.
.
drop a lot of older
2014 May 20
14
[PATCH 00/12] Cherry-pick nv50/nvc0 patches from gallium-nine
I went through the gallium-nine tree and picked out nouveau patches that are
general bug-fixes. The first bunch I'd like to also get into 10.2. I've
reviewed all of them and they make sense to me, but sending them out for
public review as well in case there are any objections.
Unless I hear objections, I'd like to push this by Friday.
Christoph Bumiller (11):
nv50,nvc0: always pull
2006 Oct 25
1
FS corruption? bogus i_mode
Hello,
I am doing some testing on a PXA270 based processor (on a single
board computer) which makes the processor vulnerable to bit flips. One
such bit flips seems to have corrupted the file system.
The debug port on the board (it is a single board computer) had the
following message when i think the FS corruption occured :
<7>init_special_inode: bogus i_mode (33061)
init_special_inode:
2004 Feb 04
1
RE: error (fwd)
Hi folks,
I've got this funny problem with R's foreign library when reading stata
files. One file consistently produces vector out of memory errors after
gobbling up 2.7G of memory. I parsed through the read.dta function and
figured out where the error occurs and the description is below. I am
running R-1.8.1 on Debian stable system glibc2.2 kernel 2.4.24. R is is
compiled from source
2009 Aug 11
2
I don't get --link-dest, at all
Hourly I have an rsync job backup /home to /home/backup. I have 24
directories (one for each hour):
home.0
...
home.23
Here is the script I am running via cron:
#! /usr/local/bin/bash
dest=`date +%k | sed 's/ //g'`
linkdir=`date -v-1H +%k | sed 's/ //g'`
chflags -R noschg /home/backup
rm -rf /home/backup/home.$dest
rsync -ahHP --numeric-ids --delete --stats --link-dest=../
2006 May 23
3
Transfer extensions processing control to Manager
I'm developing an application that monitors the state of the incoming
calls using Manager events. So, as a part of it, I need to "override"
the control of the extensions by the dialplan itself. The problem is
that, if I don't declare the incoming extension, Asterisk hangs up the
call by default. So I want to know if there's some kind of
"ManagerControl() application
2007 May 01
1
CentOS 5.0 suspend to disk (hibernate)
The RHEL 5 release notes for their desktop version claim
"Improved ACPI support with features such as suspend to disk"
but this isn't working with CentOS 5.
I've installed all the packages and updates for CentOS 5 i386 on a
ThinkPad T43 but when selecting suspend, Gnome pops up a URL to a site
that didn't seem to give a solution.
Gnome makes an entry in /var/log/messages
2017 May 26
1
noexec as CVE-2017-7494 mitigation
Am 24.05.2017 um 17:50 schrieb Jeremy Allison via samba:
> Here are some mitigation techniques from Red Hat in
> case servers cannot be patched immediately:
> 2. Mount the filessytem which is used by samba for its writeable share,
> using "noexec" option.
I would have expected this to be standard security precaution on all
pure file servers (which is probably the most