similar to: Can't login samba domain from xp/2k

Greetings, I have a newly loaded WinXP/SP2 laptop connecting to a FC6 samba share. The first 2-3 accesses to the share work fine but then it goes south. The access times are extremely long. I did a tcpdump on the FC6 box and see constant samba traffic between the laptop and the server when there is no actively on the laptop. I have a different laptop running WinXP which doesn't behave in

Hello, After researching the subject on the internet I concluded that Samba should take into account Unix file acls. During my tests I found the opposite. Only Unix file mode bits are respected, and file acls are ignored. If my initial assumption is correct and Samba do respect Unix file acls, then I am doing something wrong. Please see the setup below and point to what I am doing wrong.

Hello, I have a general administrative question concerning Samba shares. I have a large amount of data that about 25 users have limited access to. I only want these users to have access to a sub-set of this data, but I also only want the users to see that which they have access to. So, for example, suppose that the share looks like thus: /smbshare /smbshare/dir1 /smbshare/dir2

Hi, I have one NAS which I can access via NFS or Samba. This storage is accessed by 2 linux servers with Samba where I re-export the NAS share. This is sort of an active/active loadbalancing cluster. The only thing not working is locking... If a client opens a Word-File via server1 and another opens the same via server2 it won't inform the user that he can only open the file readonly. I was

I have a server 192.168.0.14 and the directory I wish to share is /home/photo I can mount from 192.168.0.1 with mount -t smbfs -o "username=photo" //192.168.0.14/photo /mnt/smbshare it prompts me for a password and I can see the contents of the share but I cannot write to it. Any pointers gladly recieved kind regards Kevin -- "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to

Hi everybody - I'm trying to write a Perl wrapper for some rsync tasks that need doing. Problem is, there's some sort of odd interaction going on between Perl and the daemon mode communication for the rsync client, and I'm at my wit's end in trying to figure it out. Here's the Perl script: #####################################################

Greetings, I think I may be having a slight configuration problem with Samba and FreeBSD-5.1. I'm trying to use FreeBSD's mount_smbfs(8) to mount a remote Samba share onto my local FreeBSD filesystem. With the configuration below, I can read all (almost; explained below) files and directories just fine. All permissions are correct. But whenever I try to write to the share, the write fails

Hello Jeremy, Friday, December 19, 2014, 7:00:06 PM, you wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:31:33PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: >> Hello Jeremy, >> Friday, December 19, 2014, 4:55:21 PM, you wrote: >> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:58:58PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: >> >> Hello Jeremy, >> >> > Do alice and bob have the same user ids on client

We have ClearCase database on unix and users on windows. We are creating Unix users locally on that Clearcase server. Samba is also installed on that server. User windows machines are part of domain. Groups,usres are created on domain and same users,groups are created on unix server. Now problem is occuring when a windows user is changing the password for his domain login. as soon as user is

Hi list - I've been using Samba since 2.x in the early 2000's, and a papercut I had eight years ago still plagues me today - when anyone on a Windows client right-clicks a folder on a Samba share and tries to view or change its permissions, it doesn't work right. The folder appears to have no permissions enabled for owner, group, or world (regardless of what the permissions

Was hoping for a helping hand. Trying to set up Samba on a domain member server. The member server was previously joined to the kerberized domain using realm join and a system keytab file exists in the /etc. Subsequently I added samba along with winbind not being entirely sure if the latter was needed. This is a Redhat 7.4 server. My smb.conf appears as follows. [global] password server = *

Hi folks, I'm running samba 3.0.33 on Solaris 9 hosts. I have a host that has two hostnames (actual + alias). I would like to be able to connect to this host via either hostname and be able to access this samba data. Note: I would prefer not to run multiple samba instances... Has anyone else experienced this sort of issue, and have you been able to resolve it? - Avron

Hello all - I am running rsync 2.5.6 on two FreeBSD 5.0 machines. I have experimented with running rsync using ssh, with command lines like the following: rsync -rv --progress jimbo@192.68.100.10:/usr/share/smbshare /usr/home/jimbo And also with running rsync as a daemon on the master server, and syncing to it from the other machine like so: rsync -rv --progress 192.168.100.10::test

Dear all, I have set up file sharing for users' directories on a RH7.2 linux server. I am running Samba 2.2.1a I configured all Linux users who have the right to use Samba to belong to "smbuser" group. However, user can't change their password using smbpasswd command. Only root user can change the password for user. When user tries to change password using smbpasswd, the

(I'm not subscribed to the list: please keep me in CC) I'm copying files between two samba server using robocopy from a third Windows PC and i'm experiencing disk usage that is much higher on the destination PC. The origin samba server is Debian Lenny with samba 3.2.5. The destination samba server is Debian Wheezy with samba 3.6.9 The PC running robocopy is Windows Server 2003 with

Hello Jeremy, Friday, December 19, 2014, 4:55:21 PM, you wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:58:58PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: >> Hello Jeremy, >> > Do alice and bob have the same user ids on client >> > and server ? >> Yes, the uids and gids are identical on both server and client machines. > Then it should work. Set debug level 10 on the smbd > and look

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:47:51PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: > Hello, > > After researching the subject on the internet I concluded that Samba should take into account Unix file acls. During my tests I found the opposite. Only Unix file mode bits are respected, and file acls are ignored. If my initial assumption is correct and Samba do respect Unix file acls, then I am doing something

Hello Jeremy, Friday, December 19, 2014, 3:48:51 PM, you wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:47:51PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: >> Hello, >> After researching the subject on the internet I concluded that Samba should take into account Unix file acls. During my tests I found the opposite. Only Unix file mode bits are respected, and file acls are ignored. If my initial assumption is

How do you get to the GLOBALS/Advanced list? The radio buttons don't seem to do anything, and nothing I tried refreshes the page with Advanced instead of Basic.

Hello All, I'm new to the list and I don't have much of experience with samba. I have a test setup on CentOS 7.8 with samba-4.10.4 and samba-vfs-glusterfs . When my client mounts the samba share via vers=1.0 , the user sees the share properly (uid,gid,mode are just like on gluster). When the share is mounted with vers=2.0 or not specified (anything higher) the files are owned by