similar to: Samba client join domain subnet issues

Greets, samba-users, I contact this list because of a problem I face at a customer's site. We run Samba version 3.0.28-0.6-1787-SUSE-CODE10 there on a SLES 10 SP2 server. This server is located behind a firewall (run by me), that firewall allows all relevant Samba-ports through (137-139, 445). The clients are located in a separated subnet, the routing between client- and server-subnet is

Hello, As subject says I am working on browsing and access servers, which are dispatched on two subnet, in one workgroup named "WORKGROUP". First here the network : ( I don' t use ASCI art 'cause I am not an expert on that and it may not be printed as it was emailed. ) So, there is five machine : - one, under debian 6, which is the gateway - two, under

Hi list! I've got a debian "etch" box running samba 3.0.24. The server is a firewall (running Shorewall 3.2.6) with five NICs: eth0 -> DSL (it has a public IP address and it allows all the people browse by masquerading other interfaces) eth1 and eth3 -> bond0 (IP address is 192.168.1.1/24) eth2 and eth4 -> bond1 (IP address is 192.168.2.1/24) BTW, bond+ refers to an

We've got Samba 2.2.2 up and running fine on an RS/6000 (AIX) machine w/ NT authentication. We have one domain w/ multiple subnets, and need users on these different subnets to have access to the shares on this machine. We've tested from a different subnet than the one we originally ran smbpasswd on, and it fails (prompting for the passwd to the share...when it works fine from the

Hi all: I have a question about join domain. If my samba server and domain controller are in different subnet (such = as 192.168.1.x and 192.168.2.x), two conditions happened: ADS domain 1. if I use domain name, then join fail. 2. if I use IP address of domain controller, join success. However, in both cases I can't retrieve domain users/groups. Is it necessary for samba sever and domain

Hello, Thanks in advance for taking the time to look at this issue. We are currently experiencing an issue with PC's not being able to join a Samba PDC controlled domain when the PC's are located outside of the subnet that the Samba PDC is part of. The PC's are located in the same physical building as the PDC, connecting over a Cisco VLAN to the Samba PDC subnet. For example, the PDC

Hello, Thanks in advance for taking the time to look at this issue. We are currently experiencing an issue with PC's not being able to join a Samba PDC controlled domain when the PC's are located outside of the subnet that the Samba PDC is part of. The PC's are located in the same physical building as the PDC, connecting over a Cisco VLAN to the Samba PDC subnet. For example, the

I just finished setting up a Linux RedHat 6.1 system with Samba 2.0.5a. I cannot browse the system from a Windows Nt Domain, but I can browse it just fine from another Linux samba system... The line: [2000/01/27 14:41:47, 0] nmbd/nmbd_logonnames.c:become_logon_server_success(118) become_logon_server_success: Samba is now a logon server for workgroup BERKELEY on subnet 127.0.0.1 looks

Hi everyone, I'm sure this has been asked a million times, but I'm having trouble getting my printer shares to be accessible on other subnets. I'm running Samba 2.0.3 (yes, I know it's OLD), and I'm using it only for printer sharing... It's set up to allow guest access only, since I'm only sharing printers. My two domain controllers are running Windows 2000 Server

Hi, after migrating to shorewall firewall from my own iptables rule set (to utilise freeswan vpn tunnels) I have successfully configured a 3 interface firewall with net2net vpn tunnels, with the help of the shorewall documentation. However I cannot seem to configure my final step which is to masq another subnet attached to my LAN (LANB, via Cisco 1603 router) to get internet access via the

I am one hurdle away from finishing my test PDC with ldap and password sync. Its been a hair raising effort... and if I can solve this one issue, we'll be ready to kick our Windows PDC out the window. When I attempt to initially join the domain ( LOGOS ) from a win2K client residing on a different subnet, I get the following: -------- The following error occured validating the name

I recently upgraded my server from a RedHat 3 on a Dell Precision 410 to RedHat 4 on a Dell Optiplex GX 620 I moved all the samba configuration files from one system to the other. The old system worked as a domain master across several subnets with the use of local samba masters on each of the outlying subnets. The new system cannot be seen as a master on the outlying subnets. When

Hi This is my first post so please be gentle! Many thanks to the developers of Samba, I?ve used it for years and it is a great system! I?m running Samba Version 3.6.6 on a raspberry Pi for testing purposes before using in anger and a Linux PC! I only need the functionality of WINS for my application for XP and Win7 clients, my PCs won?t be on a domain. I use a separate DHCP server that dishes

I've recently setup a Samba Local Master Browser on a new subnet. It can communicate on ports 137 and 138 across subnets with my Samba Domain Master Browser, but when I query the Local Master, I don't get a complete browse list. The following entries shows up in /var/log/samba/log.nmbd at the local master: nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:domain_master_node_status_fail(262)

I have founded that 0.0.0.0:port could be "closed" by setting up socket address = wishing IP addresses, for example socket address = 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.254 2015-01-11 17:46 GMT+03:00 CpServiceSPb . <cpservicespb at gmail.com>: > Thanks for this answer. > As I understood, for example if parameter > bind interfaces only = yes is and > interfaces = lan0 (192.168.0.254)

Hello, does someone could explain me what means this message : query_name_response: Multiple (2).... example : samba4 nmbd[88458]: query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet 192.168.151.237 for name SAMBA_DOMAIN<1d>. samba4 nmbd[88458]: This response was from IP 192.168.152.237, reporting an IP address of 192.168.152.237. The server has 3 nic (vlans)

Hi, We have a server being hosted in a data center. We would like to use it as our PDC. I got the remote browse sync and announce figured out. But, if possible, we would prefer not have the domain/workgroup advertised on the subnet where the PDC reside and conversely not receive the browse list for workgroup hosted on the PDC subnet on our local net. Right now, I firewalled the subnet

Hmmm, I founded some at https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2012-July/085752.html As I saw these patches was already implemented. But is it possible to receive broadcast not to 0.0.0.0 but to x.y.z.255 ? This is network broadcast either. And opened 0.0.0.0 even with checking of source net is quite insecure from net security point of view. I think so. May be is it necessary to add

Thanks for this answer. As I understood, for example if parameter bind interfaces only = yes is and interfaces = lan0 (192.168.0.254) is and if broadcast packet goes from 95.95.95.14 such packet will be dropped (in other words) ? Am I right ? And other thing. Why is 192.168.0.255 (network broadcast) opened for ? May be exact such address (network broadcast) is inbtended for receiving broadcasts

Hi All, If I have domain controller on a different subnet than the samba server and I would like to join that domain controller in an environment without WINS, meaning only DNS available. Unfortunately, it failed. Is it possible to do it? I am using domain type DOMAIN (not ADS) in smb.conf and the command I used is: "net join -Uname%passwd" I looked at the -d 10 log info and