Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "Changes to HOWTO and maybe Samba Guide for Solaris patches"
2004 Jun 01
3
1.0-test14: no sendfile() in Solaris 8
Aloha.
The current CVS snapshot and 1.0-test14 will not build on Solaris 8
because it does not provide a sendfile() funtion. It just has sendfilev().
Solaris 9 has sendfile(), though.
Using the old sendfile-util.c from 1.0-test1 and setting HAVE_SOLARIS_SENDFILEV
instead of HAVE_LINUX_SENDFILE in config.h works.
Greetings,
Andy.
2002 Dec 27
1
Syslinux 2.00 build problems on redhat 8.0
I apologize if this has already been covered, I did a half-hearted
search of the mail archives but couldn't find anything, although I
did find a couple of posts elsewhere of people having similar trouble
with ppmtolss16.
I'm having a few build problems on redhat 8.0, the first failure
in the build is a fatal error from findpatch.pl early in the build.
Bumbling through that problem there
2002 Sep 17
0
[Bug 398] New: OpenSSL build mech. doesn't acknowledge /dev/random in Solaris
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398
Summary: OpenSSL build mech. doesn't acknowledge /dev/random in
Solaris
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: Sparc
URL: http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-
cgi/findPatch.pl?patchId=112438&rev=01
OS/Version: Solaris
2012 Dec 18
1
Arel limit Where if fields are present
I trying to create a select using Arel but I''m passing three parameters, I
want to include the parameters only if they are different to nil or blank.
Here is my method:
def self.advsearch(summary_description, specialties, place)
User.joins(:experience,:summary,:information)
.where(Information.arel_table[:business].eq(false))
2008 Nov 12
21
zfs boot - U6 kernel patch breaks sparc boot
Hi,
in preparation to try zfs boot on sparc I installed all recent patches
incl. feature patches comming from s10s_u3wos_10 and after reboot
finally 137137-09 (still having everything on UFS).
Now it doesn''t boot at anymore:
###############################
Sun Fire V240, No Keyboard
Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
OpenBoot 4.22.23, 2048 MB memory installed,
2004 Feb 05
1
Solaris 9 and secondary group info from LDAP
Hi,
we are running several test installations of Samba 3 on Solaris 8 and
Solaris 9. On Solaris 9, there is a strange behaviour in terms of
getting secondary group information from LDAP.
With later revisions of patch 112960, only /etc/group is interpreted,
but there is no query on the LDAP server for (Unix-) group information.
Here is a short overview about our results:
common configuration:
2005 Feb 22
2
How current is the HOWTO collection?
When a new version of Samba is posted, is the HOWTO COllection updated,
or does the Samba Team rely on the community to spot anachronisms and
report them as bugs?
I'm struggling with a new install of Samba that's more complex than
I've tried before, and I keep the two Samba dead-tree books open on my
desk -- but if the online docs in the tarball are more current than the
books,
2005 Apr 01
2
samba & ads problem
I follow the procedure for the integration of Samba
3.0.13 in Ads environement, but when I enter the
command "net ads join -U administrator" system return
me this error:
------errrrrrror--------
morgoth:/usr/local/samba/bin# ./net ads join -U
administrator
administrateur's password:
[2005/04/01 16:34:48, 0]
utils/net_ads.c:ads_startup(191)
ads_connect: No such file or directory
2005 Mar 03
4
Can't see my Samba server into the A.D. Domain
Samba server: SUN/Solaris 8
Samba version 3.0.10
Domain: Active Directory with a W2K PDC
My Samba server is a Domain Member Server, connected to the Active Directory
Domain with the "net rpc join" unix command.
All the MS-Windows SMB client from the Domain can connect an use, without
any problem, the shares of the Samba server.
When I use, on an MS-Windows client or the PDC, the
2003 Dec 19
2
Printing OK on 98, "Access denied" on XP Pro
I have a very simple setup on a Solaris 8 server, running Samba 3.0.1 (see smb.conf below). A desktop PC running Windows 98 (SE?) happily connects to and prints to my one shared printer, but an XP Pro laptop takes a loooong time to install the local driver and then just says "Access denied, unable to connect".
I already told it to use a client driver and disabled spoolss. Here's
2003 Nov 18
2
Basic Sol8 compile question
I'm scratching my head, and thinking that I overlooked something: how do I tell my Sun compiler (on Solaris 8 2/02) to look for files in /usr/include, etc.?
For some reason -- a steam-rollered environment variable, I guess -- the compiler won't look there. I get lots and lots of "cannot find include file" messages whether ot not I try ot use --with-pam or --with-winbind.
I
2004 Feb 02
2
Solaris 8 & Samba 3: "address already in use"
I am getting errors when I try to start smbd which say that port 445 is already in use, but nothing else is using it.
In the log, the full error is:
-----start log.smbd----
[2004/02/02 11:03:53, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(662)
bind failed on port 445 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0.
Error = Address already in use
------end log.smbd-----
In my /etc/services file, I have these entries:
2005 Feb 24
2
Testing LDAP: ssh connection refused
Hi all,
I installed a samba 3 PDC with LDAP.
I created a system account in LDAP (smbldap-useradd -m
testuser). When I try to login on my system as
testuser (ssh testuser@PDC-SRV.DOMAIN.ORG) I get the
following message:
ssh: connect to host PDC-SRV.DOMAIN.ORG port 22:
Connection refused.
However, if I connect to my system using with the root
account(ssh root@ip_address) that successes.
Would you
2003 Dec 19
3
Can't compile 3.01 on Solaris
I can't get 3.0.1 to fully compile on my Solaris machines(2.6 and 2.8) Below
is an example the error I am getting. Note, that it errored out earlier with
the same problem, I typed make again and it went on to the next file, got
the same error about a file with extension .o.o not existing.
The actual error:
---
Compiling lib/replace1.c with -KPIC
mv: cannot access lib/replace1.po.o.o
***
2003 Dec 11
7
.Xauthority & SMB
I asked this question a while ago, but never got any response. Since
then, I've researched the problem some more, so I can give a much more
concise description of what's happening.
I'm mounting the home directories of the users upon login (using
pam_mount) from the Windows server. However, none of the users can run X
Windows. It says there's a problem with the .Xauthority file.
2004 Dec 23
1
Solaris 9 and secondary group info from LDAP (Bug 395) - PATCH AVAILABLE from Sun
Hi,
finally the compatibility problems between the LDAP libraries from Sun
and OpenLDAP on Solaris 9, known as bug# 395, are solved. With Patch-ID
112960-22 everything is working as it should.
Tests were OK for a Samba PDC with LDAP backend and a Samba fileserver
with "security = ADS", both on Solaris 9 with native Sun LDAP client.
Secondary group information is requested from the LDAP
2004 Jan 23
2
3.0.2rc1, LDAP, Solaris 9 and secondary group problem - Bug 395?
Hi,
we have tested Samba 3.0.0 and 3.0.1 with LDAP-Support (--with-ldap) on
Solaris 8 and it worked fine.
The machine authenticates against an OpenLDAP server. Patch 108993-23 is
applied and we use native Sun LDAP client modules.
On Solaris 9 we ran into problems with secondary groups. Users cannot
access files if the rights are based on a secondary group and if this
information is stored on
2005 Mar 10
1
Tiny HOWTO edit
On page 206 of the Samba-HOWTO-Collection PDF, in the seventh paragraph,
the word "use" appears to be missing from the sentence, "When Samba is
being used as the PDC and BDC the of an LDAP..." -- but that could just
be me.
-wde
--
Will Enestvedt
UNIX System Administrator
Johnson & Wales University -- Providence, RI
2004 Feb 10
1
Which compiler for Solaris 8?
I'm going to download Samba 3.0.2 and compile it, and I'm curious what, if any, recommendations you have for a compiler.
I initially tried to use Sun's Forte compiler when I cewt up 3.0.1, but that was a dead end. I can download GCC from all over the web -- so which version is best?
Thanks for any suggestions.
-wde
--
Will Enestvedt
UNIX System Administrator
Johnson & Wales
2005 Jun 17
1
What happened to the Solaris packaging between 3.0.2a and3.0.14a?
Arnold asked:
>
> I'm just missing the former [Solaris packaging] functionality.
> Can anyone explain why this was changed and if it is
> possible to get it back?
>
Perhaps because Samba is bundled with the OS now and fewer people
need to get it from a 3rd party? Just guessing...
-wde
--
Will Enestvedt
UNIX System Administrator
Johnson & Wales University --