similar to: Problem getting Samba 3.0.14a to join NT domain as BDC

We're running Samba 2.2.2 on an S/390 mainframe and have been experiencing problems with Samba seeming to access an invalid memory location. Below is part of the message log: Feb 15 10:48:38 linux1 kernel: VM_GROWSDOWN not set, but address 0 Feb 15 10:48:38 linux1 kernel: not in vma 0106a960 (start 400000 end 53A000) Feb 15 10:48:38 linux1 kernel: User process fault:

Hi List, This one is puzzling me. I suspect it is largely due to a badly-behaved installer, but I would appreciate any help. I'm so puzzled, I'm not even sure how to explain the problem, but here goes... I have a Samba 3.0.1 system on AIX 5.2, which a number of XP users connect to, in order to access an application installed there. The upgrade installer for said application is causing

more messages in the other node of the cluster.../var/log/messages. ======== Jun 1 19:05:59 linux2 kernel: cdrom: open failed. Jun 1 19:05:59 linux2 kernel: cdrom: open failed. Jun 1 19:09:35 linux2 kernel: OCFS2 Node Manager 0.99.10-BETA14 Tue May 31 23:34:42 EDT 2005 (build 82257c19fee200eff2ba31569613b46a) Jun 1 19:09:35 linux2 kernel: OCFS2 DLM 0.99.10-BETA14 Tue May 31 23:34:43 EDT 2005

more messages in the other node of the cluster.../var/log/messages. ======== Jun 1 19:05:59 linux2 kernel: cdrom: open failed. Jun 1 19:05:59 linux2 kernel: cdrom: open failed. Jun 1 19:09:35 linux2 kernel: OCFS2 Node Manager 0.99.10-BETA14 Tue May 31 23:34:42 EDT 2005 (build 82257c19fee200eff2ba31569613b46a) Jun 1 19:09:35 linux2 kernel: OCFS2 DLM 0.99.10-BETA14 Tue May 31 23:34:43 EDT 2005

Hi List, We have a large (6500 desktops) network distributed over a few dozen sites. The clients are (almost) all Windows95 and WinXP. We currently use Netware as our network operating system, and are looking at the possibility of moving to (Samba on) Linux to provide file and print services. One of the nice things about Novell NDS is that you can specify printers that are available to

I'm trying to understand why the buildbot sanitizer-ppc64-linux1 fails due to my latest patch. It was in llvm::GlobalValue while the reported failure is: strcspn-2.c.tmp: /home/buildbots/sanitizerslave1/sanitizer-ppc64-1/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/strcspn-2.c:17: int main(int, char **): Assertion `r == sizeof(s1) - 1' failed. where strcspn-2.c (below) tests the

Hi All, I'm trying to reproduce a failure on llvm-ppc64-linux1 (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-ppc64-linux1/builds/5382) and llvm-ppc64-linux2 builders caused by one of my patches yesterday. Some of the CodeGen/Hexagon tests failed to compile with stack dump problem. I tried to configure and build LLVM for PowerPC on my machine locally but don't see the failures. I had to remove

Dear friends, I have two Linux servers "Linux1" and Linux2" I like to mount a folder of Linux2 on Linux1 Whenever I try to mount the folder with #mount -t smbfs //Linux2/myshare /otherpc #password I give the root password and also tried other users password It gives following error: 8450: session setup failed : ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad Password - name/ password pair in a Tree

I am using the 'backup to a central backup server with 7 day incremental' example to archive three separate computers to identically configured (apart from name) shares on a Western Digital 'MyBookLive' NAS which has rsync enabled. The backup from two Raspberry Pi Computers operates without a problem but the backup from a Fedora 32 computer fails with an 'unknown module

Hi Thanks for the feedback. I currently have 3 production domains. - MYDOMAIN.COM is a production Windows 2008 domain used to support MS Exchange (but not file sharing.) - TECH - Samba3 "classic" domain with unix domain controllers that supports most users for authentication and file sharing. The DC machines are both Samba domains (for Windows clients) and KRB/LDAP

Hello! No, the first DC was a migration of a Win Server 2003, and the second DC Samba only. Yes, but already I posted the smb new post. smb.conf # Global parameters [global] workgroup = SERVERAD realm = mydomain netbios name = DC-LINUX1 (and DC-LINUX2) server role = active directory domain controller passdb backend = samba_dsdb server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, CLDAP, kdc, drepl,

hello all, i hope someone can help me out with this little nasty. i have openssh 2.3.0p1 installed on some hp-ux 11.00 boxes and a single linux box. i'm trying desperately to replace trusted hosts on these machines with something a little more secure. running some remote commands between the hp boxes, i'm getting different results with ssh than with remsh. root at hp1# remsh hp2 cat

I was able to get the source code for ocfs2 and compile it. This worked and created the necessary .ko files Now I have to figure out why gnu parted 1.6.15 has bugs. when I try a partprobe on a partitioned firewire maxtor drive mount -t ocfs2 /dev/sdb1 /u01/oradata/orcl It says no such device.... Any ideas anyone?... Regards, Mandar Vengurlekar ----- Original Message ----- From: Mandar P

I am getting this message when trying to access Samba shares on a linux system. I have 2 linux computers and one Win XP system. I can see/access/read/write on all the WinXP shares from all systems. I can only access the Linux shares on the local system, that is linux1 can see it's own Samba shares, but can't see or access the shares on linux2. the reverse is true for linux2 as well. I am

Hi, I just realised that the PPC64 bulddbot is failing because of a rather stupid issue: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-ppc64-linux1 Just removing the additional assembly file would make it green again. ;) cheers, --renato

Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > I've been working to revive the PPC64 build bots, and succeeded, but > not for the right reasons. There were still bootstrap assertion > failures and other pretty blatant errors. Then we figured out why: > the Clang bootstrapping build bots for Power7 are not actually > running any of the Clang tests! > > Could one

So far two bots have complained about 2.7 (but have 2.6): http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-i686-cygwin-RA-centos6/builds/12836/steps/configure/logs/stdio http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-s390x-linux1/builds/12002/steps/configure/logs/stdio Should we just upgrade those bots or reduce the requirement to 2.6? On 12 December 2014 at 06:41, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: > +1

I'm finding our employees' roaming profiles are not being updated. They were initially created correctly, they copy down onto a new machine, but updates are not put back onto the server. I've also noticed that smbstatus does not show any open dat files, such as ntuser.dat. I would have assumed that these files would have been held open while the client was connected. Employees can

At first no, but I find it strange tere different ids... Please if you can have your sm.conf would help. Em 29-01-2016 13:10, L.P.H. van Belle escreveu: > Hello Carlos. > > Fist please post to the list, this way everybody can help. > > The ids like : 3000036 are i think from a samba DC with RID setup. > If you want to login also on the DC with for example SSH. > > Add

I'm running on Red Hat Enterprise 3 machine with ~700Gb of Storage backing up to a similar machine using rsync backups running 6 times a day on various directories in /home/. The inital rsync copied roughly 150gb. Everything appears to be backing up correctly so no loss of data which is good :) The problem is that he backup server is not removing data that has been removed from the primary