similar to: Samba AD Groups

Having read a few posts recently I thought I would do some testing. Given XP's use of 445 and that I have a couple of networks where they only have XP clients, I thought I would try setting smb ports to 445 only rather than that suggested of just specifying 139. This has worked well for XP clients with SP2. However SP1, and presumably pre-SP1 clients, lose all sight of the NBT network.

Hello All, Your typical problem....I am trying to configure Samba-3.0.2-6.3E on RedHat Linux. I have spent days trying to get this working. What I would like to do is provide the ability to connect to Samba shares from Windows, more specific, WinXP. What I want to avoid is having to manage user accounts on both the Windows or AD side and the Unix side, thus having authentication handled by

Hello All, I am running samba-3.0.4-6.3E using winbind for AD authentication. I have a particular user that does not have a winbind sid associated with the AD account (using wbinfo) thus the user cannot access the shares. I did have to remove then recreate this account when I set it up which I believe may have caused the problem. Is there a way I can have the AD account regenerate a

Dear All, (Context: Office windows LAN; PC Pentium 3 with 128 MB, FreeBSD 5.3.) Here you are the unanswered message I sent to the FreeBSD mailing list: \BEGIN{MESSAGE} -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- After installing and launching samba 3.0.7 daemons under my postgresql FBSD5.3 stable server at office, I'm having trouble in connecting

I get the following error running rsync 2.5.2 on AIX 4.3 in combination with SSH Secure Shell 2.3.0. > rsync -e ssh myuserid@localhost:/tmp myuserid's password: /bin/ksh: rsync: not found. unexpected EOF in read_timeout This is using the SSH Communications Security Corp version of ssh. I also get the same error talking to another host which is also running commercial ssh. Note: my PATH

I have a new problem. I'm currently running Samba4 4.4.16 as an AD/DC. I've been running this AD/DC for several years now. I am using redirected folders. Up to now, domain users logging onto any domain member Windows workstation would get their desktop. Recently I discovered that users now only get their desktop on their "usual" workstation, and the Desktop Target is in fact

I am new to samba and Linux. I mapped a drive from my Windows XP workstation to the /opt directory on the Linux box. When I am in Windows Explorer and I am viewing the samba drive, I can click on any directory or file on that drive, and the speed is very fast (like a local drive). If I click on another drive and click on the samba drive again after five minutes or so, my workstation hangs

I''m using puppet to manage configs on machines where I don''t have root access. Whenever I use a File resource where the source is a puppet:// resource, I get tons of warnings when I run puppet that look like: Cannot manage ownership unless running as root True enough, I''m not running as root, but I also didn''t specifically mention a "owner"

I'm trying to add a samba server to our company network. ?The samba version is 3.0.10 running on Fedora Core 1. The problem I'm having is the Windows PCs (XP and 2000) that are trying to connect to the server won't recognize the hostname of the server - only the IP address. ?For example, putting in \\192.zzz.yyy.xxx will display the shares just fine, but putting in the hostname

Just curious, what's the reason we don't make the github mirrors the official mirrors? ...besides not knowing how to revive them when they go down. :) -Greg On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Steven Noonan <steven at uplinklabs.net> wrote: > Someone should enable the smart HTTP protocol: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-http-backend.html > > On

> LLVM has its own mirror at http://llvm.org/git/llvm.git, if that suits your needs. The llvm.org mirror seems to be quite a bit slower (~3.5x). I think it's because github lets me use the git protocol whereas llvm.org suggests http. When I try to clone "git at llvm.org:git/llvm.git", I'm asked for a password for user 'git'. -Greg On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:54 PM,

Colleagues I am working in a Linux OS with R 2.6.2. I need to execute a telnet session to another Linux machine from R, perform some operations, then return to the original computer. When I am in an R session, this is easy to accomplish by typing: system("telnet -l username machinename") I am then asked for my password; once that is entered, I am connected to the remote

You can email the list, what url says that? -Chris > On Jan 20, 2015, at 9:31 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: > > Ping > >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: >> I am not a member of the llvm-admin email list and on the description >> of that page it says, "DO NOT MAIL THIS LIST!"

Hi everyone, I am desperately looking for a method to interpolate strings within an SQL statement as follows: I get a lot of rows out of a database (in my example POSITION_to_ZIPCODE Database with holds records for German ZIP Code <--> Gauss-Krueger Coordinate System ) and want this to be selected and computed individually row by row as follows: library(RODBC) channel <-

Question for Everyone, We are running 1.9.18p8 on hpux 10.20. This particular machine has a directory called docommon that is writable by anyone. The problem we are having is that whenever someone opens a file with word 97, then saves it, they own the file and the permissions are -rw-r--r--. Thus, no one else can open the file. How can we make the files keep the -rw-rw-rw setting? Please

As a temporary fix, you can replace this line in sanitizer_linux_libcdep.c: const uptr kThreadDescriptorSize = FIRST_32_SECOND_64(1216, 2304); with const uptr kThreadDescriptorSize = FIRST_32_SECOND_64(1168, 2304); The tests should pass after that. I need to figure out which ifdefs to put this under, so I might not be able to land the fix until Monday. On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Greg

Those changes shouldn't affect ARM at all, since everything is under #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__). What version of glibc are you building with on x86? On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: > The failures happen on x86 Linux, Ubuntu Lucid. On ARM Android, my > example code segfaults, whereas before it worked. I

> Cool, can you use clang 3.3 then? :) I can, but digging deeper I see that the compiler-rt sanitizer tests depend on just-built-clang for its object instrumentation. The next time the instrumentation changes, I'd expect those tests to break. If the lit tests that require -fsanitize were moved to the clang repo, then I think it'd be safe to build compiler-rt with clang 3.3 or gcc

I've had ipf working on a few 5.3 servers for quite awhile. Not too long ago some developers had to do some coding work and were coming from dynamic IP's. I (reluctantly) opened up SSH to the world. Immediately I started seeing the attacks where bots of some sort would try to break in with a variety of different users. So, I (thought) I closed it up again and told the developers to use a

Has anyone had any experience using a VOIP provider in Japan? No matter what I try, my REGISTER string kicks back one of 2 errors: Got SIP response 481 "Call/Transaction Does Not Exist" back from x.x.x.x or Got SIP response 400 "Bad Request" back from x.x.x.x My register string is as follows: 05075034132@ipphone2.freebit.ne.jp I have tried the following also: