similar to: posix acls vs unix groups and nt acls

Hi all, As promised, I have started a howto document on setting up Samba with NT ACL support, based on experiences in my workplace, as documentation for this seems to be on the short side at the moment. It is available at the following address: http://www.bluelightning.org/linux/samba_acl_howto I have yet to convert it to proper DocBook format, and it needs more material (probably

Hello all, I want to make a Samba server act as much like an 2000 machine as possible. I've successfully got winbindd running, and also have compiled ACLs into the kernel and the XFS filesystem. What settings to I want to use in the smb.conf file to make it as close to 2000 as possible? I want to minimize the necessity of admining the box from the Linux side. Currently I have issues with

Hello everybody, Is it possible to use ACL with Samba 2.0.7 ? Thanks

Hi everyone. I have to task where i have to replace windows NT server by samba. The problem i facing is with permissions. In windows NT , administrator can provide a share permissision like , full control, read & write but no delete and read. But i have provide same functionality in samba server. How can i set such permission , write but no delete in linux through samba. I have googled

Sorry - I should have addressed this to Paul Eggleston who started this thread. Regardless who started it (the Samba + ACL howto), my offer still stands if I can be of any help. I'd be happy to help with this documentation, input, proof reading, whatever. There's definately a big lack here and the Samba team already has their hands full. Rick Segeberg rick.segeberg@waterford.org

Hi, I have a active directory domain of windows 2000. inside AD i have three user groups. Teachers, students and administration. every user has his home directory created on the fly. the umask is 0022. now what i want is that apart from users accessing there home directories there should be some other folders too which they can access. like teachers would like to access the

I'm having trouble with ACL's and wonder how many others are too. I see conflicting answers and comments about different aspects of ACL's from many prople on the list. I was wondering if ANYONE is successfully using ACL's with Samba 3.0 or above. Questions I have that I'm sure many are asking are: Was your Samba server configured as the DC? What client OS were you

All, I am currently running Samba 3.0.2a on a RHEL3 server. I would like to use the extended file systems permissions through windows, but I haven't had much luck. Here is how I am set up.... My linux box is joined to my AD domain and appears to be functioning correctly. I also have winbind set up, and functioning, although I still have some tweaking to do, it is assigning user and

It should. I just tried it out my own instructions after letting them go a few days. I didn't want them fresh in my mind. I simply copied the configs and played dumb (not too hard). I then started up my playlist server and am listening to it right now. I tested out the streaming stuff a few days ago with good results. Hope it works out as well for you all. Find anything wrong, let me know and

Mandrake 9.1's kernel needs a patch to support ACL's : http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3615 Regards, Gana?l LAPLANCHE. bgmilne@cae.co.za@lists.samba.org on 07/23/2003 06:09:59 PM Envoy? par : samba-bounces+ganael.laplanche=edf.fr@lists.samba.org Pour : samba@lists.samba.org cc : Objet : Re: [Samba] Unofficial Samba+ACL HOWTO -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

This is probably a hot topic, and if this has been beaten to the ground, forgive me. I'm not a regular part of the Samba community. Although I have been using Samba for years, I now have to use it in a corporate environment utilizing some of it's more modern features. Let me just say, that it's been several hours of testing/troubleshooting to get where I am now. (And I don't

<quote who="Adon Irani"> > hello every0ne , it's ad0n from theDV8network.com . > > i've been hearing of more and more people in my community who are > having troubles connecting to our netw0rk . in most cases , wind0ws > media player or realone is stealing the associations ; What associations? > and even if they've installed winamp , the stream

Hi there, I have to admit Im new to samba and have been struggling for weeks now on how to mount a wind0ws 2000 server share on my Linux box with read-write access. I have mounted the windows share using the command: mount -t smbfs -o username=winaccount //windows/share /my/mountpoint but the problem is it's mounted as read-only to a regular user. Only the root account have the write

Hello Rsync open source community, We are in the process of the data migration from RHEL NFS Server into NetApp using "rsync 3.1.3 with -XAavzHP -inplace --filter= '-x system.posix_acl' /source_NFSv4 /destination_NFSv4 " options : Current NFS Exports have legacy POSIX ACLs applied on some files, the reason we are using "-XA" is because we also have NFS v4 ACLs

Is anyone looking at supporting the POSIX extended ACLs? Thanks! Trevor

Hello, I have recently set up a Samba based file server running 3.0.27a. This file server is part of a Windows 2003 domain, with ACL and extended attribute support enabled, and appears to be functioning properly except for one critical issue with the ACLs. When I try to edit the permissions of a file through Windows, the default POSIX ACL that I set up on the filesystem seems to be masking off

Hi all, we are experiencing difficulties with posix ACLs using samba 3.0.28 on a Debian 4.0 etch server. The goal is to not let the Windows clients manage the ACLs but instead set the permissions from the Samba server, hence smb.conf says "nt acl support = no". Problems arise when I have a directory with default permissions for a named group, e.g. # file: ACLTest # owner: juergen #

Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/attachments/20050831/54e830f9/attachment.bin

We currently set sb->s_flags |= MS_POSIXACL unconditionally, which is incorrect -- it tells the VFS that it shouldn''t set umask because we will, yet we don''t set it ourselves if we aren''t using POSIX ACLs, so the umask ends up ignored. Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> --- fs/btrfs/super.c | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

I'd very much appreciate some help with a rather major problem I'm having. I have a Dell 6450 quad Xeon Processor machine with 8GB of RAM and 1TB of disk (RAIDed with an Adaptec 5400S RAID controller). It is running samba (2.2.8) to server up files to around 2300 Windows 2000 machines. The machine was originally installed and configured around September 2002. It had been running