similar to: Samba not utilizing full available bandwidth

I recently upgraded a part of my network to Gigabit ethernet, basically between my Linux machine and my main windows machine, is now gigabit. The problem is that, and the whole reason I went with it, is to get faster speeds with samba. I've only been able to get 13.4 MB/s as a maximum transfer speed. I don't expect to be able to get 125 MB/s. If I use HTTP I can get around 18 MB/s,

Hello, I have a question concerning the performance of rsync beteen two sites, one in India one in Germany. File exchange between 2 Linux-machines is done using rsync-3.0.5 (typical file size 1.5 GB). Destination machine is: Linux machine1 2.6.9-55.0.9.ELsmp #1 SMP Tue Sep 25 02:16:15 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Source machine is: Linux machine2 2.6.18-53.el5 #1 SMP Wed Oct 10

I want to provide internet to home users with 256 Kbps and I have a 3 Mbps dedicated internet connection. Do you think It''s ok to split the 3 Mbps in 480 users? Thanks, -- Nicolas _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

OS: CentOS 5.0 x86. Hi, I am using CentOS 5.0 at home, ADSL ~16 Mbps/~1 Mbps Internet connection and my ping time to my ISP is 160-170 msec. When downloading something with Firefox, I am getting download speeds of about 100-180 KB/sec (for example when downloading SP2 of XP from MS server). Are the CentOS networking settings OK for this kind of latency, or do I have to change some settings?

FYI for anyone using the dual ethernet ports on a Grandstream BT102. I'm using a BT102 connected to an HP2524 10/100 switch, which has an asterisk box connected directly to it. No VLANs defined or in use. Measured bandwidth: PC -> HP Switch -> Asterisk : actual throughput measured at 94.1 mbps. PC -> BT102 -> HP Switch -> Asterisk : actual measured at 8.86 mbps. The

Dear All I am a newbie to traffic control and i am trying to setup bandwidth restriction in my local network as well as internet access to users. I got around 60 pcs in my lab and i am planning to divide bandwidth based on classes. I am using iptables to mark packets and then route the traffic to the specified class. Following is the network setup Two network cards in the server eth0

FYI for anyone using the dual ethernet ports on a Cisco 7960. I'm using a Cisco 7960 connected to an HP2524 10/100 switch, which has an asterisk box connected directly to it. No VLANs defined or in use. Measured bandwidth: PC -> HP Switch -> Asterisk : actual throughput measured at 94.1 mbps. PC -> 7960 -> HP Switch -> Asterisk : actual measured at 93.02 mbps. The

FYI for anyone using the dual ethernet ports on a Polycom IP600. I'm using a Polycom IP600 connected to an HP2524 10/100 switch, which has an asterisk box connected directly to it. No VLANs defined or in use. Measured bandwidth: PC -> HP Switch -> Asterisk : actual throughput measured at 94.1 mbps. PC -> IP600 -> HP Switch -> Asterisk : actual measured at 91.9 mbps. The

We are running a benchmark that does single threaded 512 KB writes to a LUN on a CLARiiON storage array. The dual Xeon host (Dell 2650) with 4 GB of memory runs RHEL 4U3 We measured the write bandwidth for writes to the block device corresponding to the lun (e.g. /dev/sdb), a file in an ext2 filesystem and to a file in an ext3 file system. Write b/w for 512 KB writes Block device 312 MBps Ext2

I just using around 7 years ago lan card, can the lan card support external 100 Mbps bandwidth on Shorewall ? Thanks _______________________________________ YM - 離線訊息 就算你沒有上網，你的朋友仍可以留下訊息給你，當你上網時就能立即看到，任何說話都冇走失。 http://messenger.yahoo.com.hk

Hi, Any body having idea to find the NIC Capacity / BW (10 / 100 Mbps) ? Whether the interface may be eth0/eth1/ppp0 or some other. Is there any related IOCTL avialable, if so just give the linux-2.4.18 file path. thanks, Srikanth. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hey guys, I'm trying to migrate my NT4 Domain and am having some problems. Ignoring my other post related to this, I can't get any of my machines to be able to login. Alls I ever get is "Your computer account was not found or the password is incorrect" I even tried rejoining the domain which works. I leave the domain and then rejoin it, it takes a LONG time (might just be

christophe.guerin@etud.univ-pau.fr wrote: > > * Enough bandwidth to run the server. If you want to broadcast to 100 > listeners at 24kbps, you'll need about 24kbps*100 = 2,400kbps = 2.4Mbps > of bandwidth. That's about 2 T1 lines worth of bandwidth. Trying to > push 100 128kbps listeners down your 768kbps cable modem isn't going > to work :) It

I am trying to limit outgoing SMTP traffic to about 14 Mbps and these are the IPFW rules I am using. ${fwcmd} add pipe 1 tcp from 192.168.0.0/24 to any 25 out via dc0 ${fwcmd} pipe 1 config bw 14Mbit/s I've tried multiple tweaks to the pipe rule and I seem to be missing something. I only get about half the bandwidth I specify. Is this normal behavior? Is there something wrong

I would like to remove setsockopt(SO_LINGER), as there does not seem to be a reason for its use. If you know of specific reasons we should keep any of these let me know, or run this patch in local test trees where possible. This is against OpenBSD, but should apply to portable with some fuzz. Index: channels.c =================================================================== RCS file:

Hello! I use tincd to interconnect 3 LANs: A, B and C. So long, it works fine: everybody reaches everybody. But I want a different behavior: A and B should be allowed to talk, as should B and C. I tried to simply delete the host-files on the nodes that should not be allowed to talk to eachother: A has a hostfile from B B has a hostfile from A and C C has a hostfile from B But this is no

Hi People, I recently setup a replication service within dovecot between two machines in different datacenters, which has the following configuration; (yes it is hashed out, because I needed to) #service replicator { # unix_listener replicator-doveadm { # mode = 0666 # } # process_min_avail = 1 #} # #service aggregator { # fifo_listener replication-notify-fifo { # mode = 0666 #

a previously rock solid reliable server of mine crashed last night, the server was still running but eth0, a Intel 82574L using the e1000e driver, went down. The server has a Supermicro X8DTE-F (dual Xeon X5650, yada yada). server is a drbd master, so that was the first thing to notice network issues. Just a couple days ago I ran yum update to the latest, I do this about once a month.

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:27 AM, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 2017?04?19? 04:21, Willem de Bruijn wrote: >> >> +static void virtnet_napi_tx_enable(struct virtnet_info *vi, >> + struct virtqueue *vq, >> + struct napi_struct *napi) >> +{ >> + if

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:27 AM, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 2017?04?19? 04:21, Willem de Bruijn wrote: >> >> +static void virtnet_napi_tx_enable(struct virtnet_info *vi, >> + struct virtqueue *vq, >> + struct napi_struct *napi) >> +{ >> + if