similar to: still ACL bug in 3.0.14a

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7865 Summary: files or dirs with more than 16 ACLs are not rsynced correctly Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: IA64 OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

Samba 3.0.28-0.1.95-1624-SUSE-SL10.3 A strange problem (best read in a proportional font). It only happens on an x64 XP client when accessing a Samba share. The exact same program runs fine on the same x64 XP client when the share accessed is on a Windows server or when it is run on a 32-bit XP client, regardless of whether the share belongs to a Samba server or to a Windows server. I have

I use a lot of "force user" and "force group" directives on various shares. With smbstatus of Samba 2 I could always verify with a glance what uid and gid a particular service is being accessed as, with Samba 3 you can't. I'd REALLY like to see that come back to smbstatus. Here's a real world example of my complaint... Samba 2 smbstatus output... Samba version

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Just attempted to build 3.0.23pre1 on HP-UX 11.11 today, preparing for a planned move to a later version of 3.0.x (we're currently down at 3.0.11). Configure ran fine, but make eventually failed here: Compiling lib/sysacls.c cc: warning 422: Unknown option "fPIE" ignored. cc: "lib/sysacls.c", line 1277: warning 611: Type

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: > > I wonder why the already built-in binaries are not enough / adequate. > Or, in other words, I am curious about why do you need to build your > own binary files, instead of using the files that are already there > in the official archives in kernel.org. I don't believe it can be used as is: bash# file

On May 13, 2014 4:04 PM, "Ady" <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: > > > I wonder why the already built-in binaries are not enough / adequate. > > I don't believe it can be used as is: > > bash# file syslinux > > syslinux: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version

I've just released rsync 2.6.9pre3. This should be the last version before the final 2.6.9 release, and I don't foresee any significant changes between it and the final release. Please test this out and email the rsync mailing list with any questions, comments, bug reports, etc. Thanks! Here are direct links for the tar file and its signature:

I've just released rsync 2.6.9pre3. This should be the last version before the final 2.6.9 release, and I don't foresee any significant changes between it and the final release. Please test this out and email the rsync mailing list with any questions, comments, bug reports, etc. Thanks! Here are direct links for the tar file and its signature:

Hello, I'm having problems getting the SAMBA domain to trust an NT domain. The following is how I went about the exercise: 1. On the NT domain, I added the SAMBA domain A/C in the TRUSTING DOMAINS list, providing a certain password. 2. On the SAMBA domain, I executed the following command feeding the same password given in step 1, but without success: [root@cobra root]# net rpc trustdom

Dear all, I have found the following (for me) incomprehensible behaviour of ISOdate (POSIXct): > ISOdate(1900,6,16) [1] "1900-06-15 14:00:00 Westeurop?ische Sommerzeit" > ISOdate(1950,6,16) [1] "1950-06-16 14:00:00 Westeurop?ische Sommerzeit" Note that in the first case I get the 15th of June back, not the 16th as I would have expected! This happened under R-1.7.1 on

G'day list, I am getting a lot[1] of traffic on my Internet link, ICMP messages from 69.73.19.178 telling me UDP port 5036 is unreachable (this IP address belongs to iaxtel.org). I see from the wiki that IAXtel supports only IAX2 from December 2003. Fine, however it looks like my * still wants to try and register using IAX1, and I can't find how to turn this off. This situation is

I'm having trouble with files being marked read-only in Windows because the Solaris file owner does not have write-permissions on the file; group-write is allowed: -r--rw---- 1 user group 32 Feb 13 14:19 testfile.txt I thought that setting "store dos attributes = yes" for this share would allow the "read only" setting to be stored in extended attributes, but it

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > Did you check README or doc/distrib.txt? I've read all files in doc folder as well as done some google search.. >> What are the dependencies besides python? >> Could using python be avoided while building extlinux? > > Do you plan on having any COM32 modules in your boot system? Due to

Hello, I would like to run some code in parallel with each cluster reading/writing to a different working directory. I've tried the following code without success. The error I get is: "Error in setwd(x) : cannot change working directory" library(parallel) dirs <- list("out1","out2","out3") # these directories are located within the current

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26797 Summary: GeForce 6150SE: DVI-connector not detected Product: xorg Version: 7.4 Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

I've got CentOS 5 installed on my hp pavilion ze 5300 laptop and the network configuration UI says my wireless NIC has been correctly identified and assigned what appears to be the right Broadcom device driver on eth1. However, the inteface doesn't come up. Google doesn't find anything recent about using Linux with Broadcom except for someone's passing remark that Ubuntu 7 beta

Apologies if I should ask this elsewhere, google search is not helping. I've got a CentOS5 server with lighttpd installed from EPEL, configured for https only (no connections on ports other than 443). I have the latest security updates for openssl, etc. However, when connecting to the server with recent Chrome from Windows or Android, I get the "Your connection is not private"

Folks, I like criticism! Please give me lots of it - particularly in respect of the updated "Samba-Guide". It should now be up on the Samba mirror sites. You can download it from: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-Guide.pdf I have incorporated all feedback into this book. Did I get it right this time or should I give up? So far, not a word of feedback is deafening! Is it

I got file conflicts between the sysreport and sos packages on the file /usr/sbin/sysreport. I unchecked sysreport in the package updater UI and the rest of the update is proceedng.

I'd been putting off installing the FX3 packages because of some extensions I use that don't have upgrades. [*] However, when FX1.5 crashed on me today I decided to finally go ahead. Fired up yum and I'm told I have to install a slew of evolution28 library packages in order to install the firefox package. Why? I removed evolution from my system for a reason, and I'd just as