similar to: samba user1 -> samba user2 migrating - how?

Henrik Zagerholm wrote: > It sure could be :) > > I know that Jerry (Carter) of the samba team was looking at this a > while ago (psexec) but I guess he's been busy with the Samba4 TP. > Samba TNG has a command called cmdat which will let you schedule > commands on a win box using the at command. > www.samba-tng.org > By using the /now parameter you can execute

[I sent this email to the list in January but haven't seen it appear. Maybe it didn't get through moderation?] How many times have I typed in one window ssh -L 8022:server:22 user1 at gateway only so that I can type (in another window!) scp -P 8022 file user2 at localhost: This is a pain: * cumbersome * requires two commands windows * confuses ssh's host key

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 4 Jun 2014, Katja Wegner wrote: > Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 16:21:04 +0200 > From: Katja Wegner <katja.wegner92 at web.de> > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Subject: [Dovecot] IMAP copy fails because the mailbox size of user1 is > exceeding the quota limit of user2?? > > Hi all, > I do have a mailbox-quota problem

Hi list! I have some machines running openssh 3.9p1. AllowUsers is set to my users, that are allowed to login. If I set PermitRoot without-password, but do not include root in AllowUsers, root is not able to login with pubkey. I do not want to set root in AllowUsers, since the without-password option should check this allready, I think... So I made a small patch that allows me to login as root

I'm just exploring the Profile Editor, described on http://www.pcc-services.com/custom_poledit.html - and policies saved to NTConfig.pol file and copied to the netlogon share work great for Windows XP machines. However, with Windows 2000, they don't work at all. Winh XP machines - policies are applied. I see in Samba logs that the NTConfig.pol is copied from the server to the w2k

Hi all, I do have a mailbox-quota problem in dovecot 2.0.19 that is beond my understanding. Could someone pls. give me a hint. - user1 max. mailbox quota is set to 1GB, the current mailbox size of user1 is 15MB - user2 max. mailbox quota is set to 10MB, the current mailbox size of user1 is 10kB - user1 shares the folder 'shared_folder' to user2 with all rights (read, write ...) -

I would like to have roaming profiles for one group of users (student1, student2), and local profiles for another group of users (Joe, Mary). Is it possible with Samba? From what I've tested, one can use either roaming profiles with a setting similar to the one below: logon path = \\%L\profiles\%G\%U Or local profiles, using the logon path empty: logon path = I have no clue how to

Just search online why in general that is insecure via CLI vs programmatic for first class automation.. there is a reason why snmp, rest, ... exist. On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 3:50 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo at wpkg.org> wrote: > You've mentioned security issues in your previous email, but now you're > hopping to management issues. > > Have you tried Ansible, Chef or

Al like any open-source or free sofware you need to put the leg work into what you want it to be. My company is actually creating something using TINC and we believe in it. If successful we'll be giving back to TINC monetarily in a big way to make TINC even better so if TINC isn't for you keep an eye on further developments in the future. Thanks, Rafael On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:03

Programmatic management with first class APIs is preferred for larger deployments.. On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:28 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo at wpkg.org> wrote: > Could you elaborate on why CLI (SSH) managing is insecure? > > > Tomasz Chmielewski > https://lxadm.com > > > On 2018-03-27 04:23, al so wrote: > >> So, for remote manageability of Tinc, we

Hello, I have Samba 3 PDC and win2k sp4 client. I would like to install printer on a machine globally, for all users. To do this, I use: net use X: \\server\unattended /user:domain\unattended password rundll32 printui.dll,PrintUIEntry /q /y /ga /in /n \\server\HP2000C First line is mounting share (Administrator is not logged to the domain), and the second line is to install printer.

What is the easiest way to allow normal users to install printers (which are available through a Samba server)? Normally, Windows 2000 and XP need to have a printer installed by the admin first on a given workstation - only the it can be used by the user. I want to allow the user to install own printers. Now, when one trises to right click on a printer on a server and "connect", he

I converted an ext4 filesystem with btrfs-convert, mounted it, and wanted to do "lzop -d ...". The result was an immediate Oops (btrfs is on LVM, on dm-crypt, on /dev/sdb which is USB-connected). mini-904.img.lzo dentry_open failed BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffcd IP: [<c01b5f36>] fput+0x6/0x30 *pde = 00575067 *pte = 00000000 Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP last sysfs

There is a reason most NMS systems used SNMP in the past and REST apis past 7+ years. They don't use CLIs except toy Expect type scripts.. Not just security but better error handling and more. Good luck learning! On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 9:03 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo at wpkg.org> wrote: > SNMP is mainly used for monitoring, not _server_ automation. > > Also, it's

At the beginning of August, Mikulas Patocka posted to linux-kernel mailing list about adding snapshot merging to LVM[1]. Basicaly, snapshot merging means that it is possible to turn a snapshot back into its origin. Using LVM, however, means that you need to have free place outside of the filesystem (i.e., in physical volume) to make snapshots, which is not always possible on workstations and

I have the following appended to gluster logs at around 100kB of logs per second, on all 10 gluster servers: [2012-06-11 15:08:15.729429] I [dht-layout.c:682:dht_layout_dir_mismatch] 0-sites-dht: subvol: sites-client-41; inode layout - 966367638 - 1002159031; disk layout - 930576244 - 966367637 [2012-06-11 15:08:15.729465] I [dht-common.c:525:dht_revalidate_cbk] 0-sites-dht: mismatching layouts

I have a share with a couple of symlinked files in it. On a Samba server, it looks like this for "addon" directory: # ls -l (...) acrobatreader7 (...) addon -> /home/samba/unattended-write/packages Now, if I mount it on a Linux client using smbmount, symlinks point to non existing directories locally (/home/samba/unattended-write/packages exist only on a Samba server): #

I have an asterisk box and SIP / IAX2 phones. To call out, users have to add 0 (zero) before a real telephone number. That means, that if they want to call someone that has a number 123456, they have to call 0-123456. Simple, right? This has a serious drawback though - when someone calls us from the number 123456, we see the callerID 123456, and we're unable to use the callback/redial

rsync in daemon mode is very powerful, yet it comes with one big disadvantage: data is sent in plain. The workarounds are not really satisfying: - use VPN - one needs to set up an extra service, not always possible - use stunnel - as above - use SSH - is not as powerful as in daemon mode (i.e. read only access, chroot, easy way of adding/modifying users and modules etc.) Why was encrypted

Hello, I'm about to deploy Samba PDC and several BDCs. As far as I understand Samba and domain logons, this means that a user will be able to log onto any server, with his workstation choosing a domain controller that is probably the closest/fastest etc. one. As a consequence, this also means, that on each server there has to be a copy of a profile of a given user, right? If so, how can