similar to: corruption in the locking tdb, samba panics [SOLVED]

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "corruption in the locking tdb, samba panics [SOLVED]"

2006 Jan 26
2
Machine failing to keep its trust with Domain Controller
Hi, We have a Linux (RHEL 3.0, update 3) Samba 3 server which worked fine for months but suddently have trouble to keep its trust with the DC server. The only way to recover is to reset the machine account from the Windows DC side and do a "net join" to the domain from the Linux side. The Linux machine is able to keep its "trust" with the domain exactly 7 days, which,
2005 Mar 07
2
corruption in the locking tdb, samba panics
Hello, last friday I switched my users from an old server running 2.2.12 to a new one running 3.0.10 (that I've been testing myself and with smbtorture). After a while I had to switch back to the old server because some users were having serious problems. This is one of the logs (the others are very similar): [2005/03/04 12:25:05, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725)
2008 Jan 18
0
Can't write to share.
HI all, Having fixed the group issues from solaris having a default max of 16 groups I can now locally create and delete files on the solaris box as a domain user However when accessed via samba I can not create new files/folders (although I can delete the files I created when logged on locally) I have created a temporary directory on a non zfs (non acl enabled) file system to see if that
2008 Jan 16
0
(no subject)
Hi all, I have a Solaris 10 (update 4) box (x86) that is joined to an active directory via samba/winbind (3.0.25c version included with Solaris including latest patches). The users are working fine however their group membership is not. Users that should be members of certain groups do not seem to be: in that if I run 'groups' and check the group member ship for my domain account I am
2008 Feb 27
0
winbind group membership
Hi all, I have a Solaris 10 (update 4) box (x86) that is joined to an active directory via samba/winbind (3.0.25c version included with Solaris including latest patches). The users are working fine however their group membership is not. Users that should be members of certain groups do not seem to be: in that if I run 'groups' and check the group member ship for my domain account I am
2009 Jun 08
1
[LLVMdev] Replacing unconditional branches with conditional ones
Hi all, Somewhat of a newbie's question, hope you can help me out. I'm trying to turn unconditional BranchInst's into conditional ones (with a condition I'm supplying) branching between the original target and a basic block of my choice. Apparently the way to do that is to create a new conditional BranchInst and remove the unconditional one from its basic block. However when
2008 Jan 16
1
winbind: group membership issues.
Hi all, I have a Solaris 10 (update 4) box (x86) that is joined to an active directory via samba/winbind (3.0.25c version included with Solaris including latest patches). The users are working fine however their group membership is not. Users that should be members of certain groups do not seem to be: in that if I run 'groups' and check the group member ship for my domain account I am
2012 Nov 14
0
[LLVMdev] Clang error - CPU feature not currently enabled
Hello, I'm trying to use clang to compile a file on Mac OS (x86_64) and get the following error. <inline asm>:4:2: error: instruction requires a CPU feature not currently enabled jmp *%edx ^ fatal error: error in backend: Error parsing inline asm This file does compile on an Ubuntu 32bit machine I checked on google and didn't find anything helpful about it. Does
2012 Nov 14
2
[LLVMdev] Clang error - CPU feature not currently enabled
From: Shaltiel, Alon Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 11:39 AM To: 'llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu' Subject: Clang error - CPU feature not currently enabled Hello, I'm trying to use clang to compile a file on Mac OS (x86_64) and get the following error. <inline asm>:4:2: error: instruction requires a CPU feature not currently enabled jmp *%edx ^ fatal error: error in
2012 Nov 14
0
[LLVMdev] Clang error - CPU feature not currently enabled
I believe it's failing on 64-bit because that's a 32-bit indirect jump. 64-bit needs jmp *%rdx. On Wednesday, November 14, 2012, Shaltiel, Alon wrote: > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Shaltiel, Alon > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 14, 2012 11:39 AM > *To:* 'llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > 'llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu');>'
2012 Dec 17
0
[LLVMdev] target arm
Hi, As I understand it, the issue is that (at least in principle) the information in any of the C/C++ system headers can be different between different architectures (and even major versions of the standard library on a given architecture). As such, clang/clang++ attempts to find the system header file for the target architecture rather than the host, and for general code there's no way to
2012 Dec 31
1
[LLVMdev] reg2mem breaks module
Hello, I'm trying to apply the reg2mem pass on my bc file, but it somehow adds an instruction before a landingpad instruction and so I get a broken module error: The unwind destination does not have a landingpad instruction! %41 = invoke %class.x* @_ZN10xC2Ev(%class.x* %.reload19) to label %.noexc unwind label %88
2012 Nov 14
0
[LLVMdev] About a problem in SROA
Hello, I'm trying to use clang to compile a file on Mac OS (x86_64) and get the following error. <inline asm>:4:2: error: instruction requires a CPU feature not currently enabled jmp *%edx ^ fatal error: error in backend: Error parsing inline asm This file does compile on an Ubuntu 32bit machine I checked on google and didn't find anything helpful about it. Does
2011 Feb 02
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2.-2.8 failed on gcc 3.4.6
Hi, I got the following error message when I try to compile llvm-gcc with gcc 3.4.6: cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-variadic-macros" make[3]: *** [llvm-main.o] Error 1 Someone have an idea ? thanks ________________________________ This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you have received this message in error, please immediately
2013 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Clang on windows can't compile a code with a zeroinitializer array
When the .bc file contains an array as the following: @.str = private global [7 x i8] zeroinitializer "llc -march=x86" generates the following x86 assembly lines: .data .lcomm L_.str,7 And trying to compile it with clang generates an error: "fatal error LNK1143: invalid or corrupt file: no symbol for COMDAT section 0x3". Is that fixable? Thanks! Alon
2012 Nov 14
0
[LLVMdev] Clang error - CPU feature not currently enabled
Yep. That diagnostic is terrible. As of r167937 we get: error: instruction requires: 32-bit mode jmp *%edx ^ -Jim On Nov 14, 2012, at 8:41 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > Most likely candidate for sure. Not a helpful error message though :( > > -eric > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote:
2012 Dec 17
2
[LLVMdev] target arm
Hello, I'm trying to use clang to compile a file in an x86 machine (running i386 GNU/Linux) to ARM. In the end, all I want is for the bit code (I use -emit-llvm) getArch() result to be Triple::ARM. I tried to use "-target arm" but I get a "fatal error: 'bits/predefs.h' file not found". Is there any easy way to make the target architecture "ARM" without
2012 Nov 14
2
[LLVMdev] Clang error - CPU feature not currently enabled
Most likely candidate for sure. Not a helpful error message though :( -eric On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com>wrote: > I believe it's failing on 64-bit because that's a 32-bit indirect jump. > 64-bit needs jmp *%rdx. > > > On Wednesday, November 14, 2012, Shaltiel, Alon wrote: > >> ** ** >> >> ** **
2013 May 13
4
[LLVMdev] Generate PE\COFF file with ARM instructions
Hi guys, I have a question about the LLVM ARM backend: I try to build *.c files for Windows Phone (Windows 8) - so, basically I need to generate an "arm-pe" file (I *think* it has the same file structure like x86-pe file, but i am not sure). unfortunately, LLVM has no support with ARM PE\COFF. Any ideas? How difficult is to add the support in this file format? (LLC can generate ARM
2012 Apr 17
0
CTDB panics when vacuuming serverid.tdb
CTDB Samba Team, I have a two-node cluster successfully running a GFS2 filesystem. I compiled ctdb ver 1.12 with Samba 3.6.3 for 64-bit systems. Running on RHEL 5.7. I was able to add the cluster to the domain but after I restarted CTDB, it panics right after doing a vacuum of the serverid.tdb database. The lock file is on the GFS FS so both nodes can access it. Any ideas as to what