similar to: centos 5.1 netinstall iso bugged ?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "centos 5.1 netinstall iso bugged ?"

2005 May 06
0
graphical shutdown
Hi everyone, I know that Linux "does reboot only for adding new hardware" but here at home I need to do it more often. The shutdown phase is only textual or it can be like on bootup where with "esc" I can see (if i want) the messages ? I can never say if it's me or the "graphical" thing is abandoned ... Thanks for the (eventual) reply... -- Nicola
2006 Aug 30
2
Yum updates packages for other arch too
Hi, I have the x86_64 arch on my server so therfore i expect that yum updates only x86_64 packages. With the last *yum update* i?ve noticed a strange behaviour while retrieving the needed packeges. As you you see, yum wants install packages for different architectures: glibc x86_64 2.3.4-2.25 base 4.9 M glibc i686 2.3.4-2.25 base 5.1 M . .
2009 Jul 31
0
[fun] 10th annual System Administrator Appreciation Day
Friday, July 31, 2009, is the 10th annual System Administrator Appreciation Day. On this special international day, give your System Administrator something that shows that you truly appreciate their hard work and dedication. (All day Friday, 24 hours, your local timezone). http://www.sysadminday.com/ ^___^ Thank You SysAdmins !!! -- kOoLiNuS Nicola Losito
2012 Jun 01
1
problems installing parted tool
i have downloaded the CentOS distribution that comes with Xen Cloud Platform (XCP) at http://www.xen.org/download/xcp/index.html. i am trying to install the parted utility. yum install parted however, i get the following message. Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Setting up Install Process No package parted available. Nothing to do any ideas on what's
2008 Aug 07
1
Firewire/IEEE1394 support on centos.plus repro and yum update
Helo, I'm trying to update a centos server with a kernel form the centos.plus repro because it contain Firewire/IEEE1394 support. But when y do a : # yum update The kernel from the base is more recent thant the centos plus repro I have tried with the http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities plug-in and it didn't take the right kernel :
2006 Sep 06
2
4.4 update quits unexpectedly
After 2 good updates to 4.4, my 3rd is giving me trouble. I did all 3 installs the same: yum clean all yum update python-sqlite sqlite yum yum clean all yum upgrade This one, however, quits during the header download. I get "[Errno -1] Header not complete, trying another mirror", then "[Errno 256] No more mirrors to try". I am not going thru a proxy, and I can't find
2008 Aug 21
1
YumRepo Warning: not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet
Hi all Does anyone know what causes this error? I have setup a local CentOS repository, with mrepo, and can succesfully use it for updates & installation of just about anything. Yet, this error comes up. Here's my /etc/yum.conf: # PUT YOUR REPOS HERE OR IN separate files named file.repo # in /etc/yum.repos.d [base-local] name=CentOS-$releasever - Base #mirrorlist=
2007 Jul 20
1
centosplus repo updates
Hello, First of all thanks to the poster on the wiki for centosplus. I've configed it added include and exclude lines, do i need the centos-priority plugin? I want to enable centosplus to use the centosplus kernel and the centosplus webstack. Below are my base, updates, and centosplus repo definitions. I'm getting an error when i do a yum update that a dependency for postfix
2006 Feb 11
2
FW: Unable to update
Thanks for the quick response! Here is my yum.repos.d -> [base] name=CentOS-$releasever - Base baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/ gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-centos4 #released updates [update] name=CentOS-$releasever - Updates baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/updates/$basearch/ gpgcheck=1
2011 Mar 16
3
only one puppet client fails with yum
hello list.. I am sharing a yum configuration in a class (centos.pp) between two nodes. But the yum configuration doesn''t apply at all to one node even tho it does to another identically configured node. ## packages are failing to install via yum on one ec2 aws instance and another identical ec2 instance works fine [root@kromep2 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5.5 (Final)
2009 Jul 08
5
no more single cd installs?
for some reason cent 5 now wants cd 3 as well as 1. I make sure to uncheck everything and instlal only the base system. Bad iso or new default? Sincerely, William Warren
2008 Jan 31
1
centosplus + priority plugin
I have a Centos 4 box that has been updated all the way to 4.6 without using the centosplus repository. Now I want to use the centosplus repository for Centos 4 to get the latest LAMP, mod_perl, perl and other perl modules so that I can install rt 3.6.6 and its necessary modules. However, for some reason, the latest perl package in the centosplus repository does not appear on the radar when
2016 Oct 28
1
aarch64 / Raspberry Pi3
Hi, some time ago we've been asked to provide aarch64 build of qemu-kvm-ev for CentOS Cloud SIG consumption. We did it, and while at it we also built oVirt 4.0 VDSM dependencies for aarch64 in CentOS Virt SIG. Testing repositories have been created and are now publicly available: [centos-qemu-ev-test] name=CentOS-$releasever - QEMU EV Testing baseurl=
2019 Feb 09
2
CentOS 7.6 and Xen 4.6 / centos-release-xen broken
Hi, On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 06:39:59PM +0200, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > Hello George, > > On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 12:06:49PM +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > In order to make sure SIG content is "fresh", whenever a new version > > of CentOS comes out, content is discarded automatically unless SIG > > chairs specifically request it
2018 May 15
2
centos-qemu-ev repository not work for x86_64 arch on CentOS 7.5
Hello, Sandro! On 11.05.2018 12:19, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > Sadly, the new qemu-kvm-ev we prepared for CentOS 7.5 didn't get released ( > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14764) but the new build is ready. After installing CentOS 7.5 and installing package qemu-kvm-ev I can't install KVM on x86_64 arch: command "yum -y install perf qemu-kvm-ev qemu-kvm-tools-ev
2013 Aug 23
1
yum update after update from 6.3 to 6.4 - problems with epel repository.
Hi All. I've updated my system from 6.3 to 6.4. In my /etc/yum.repos.depel.repo I have: [epel] name=Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux - $basearch #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/$basearch mirrorlist= http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=epel-6&arch=$basearch failovermethod=priority gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5
2011 May 27
2
local repo
Hi all, When I am installing I use kickstart and have a line like: repo --name=Updates --baseurl=http://192.168.1.14/centos/5.6/updates/x86_64/ and that works great for installing the OS. After that the machine reboots and I have it automatically go into additional installations running scripts. These installations do "yum install XXX". However, its no longer using my above repo
2005 Jul 07
1
Yum Update issues
I get this when i try to yum update: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/updates/i386/repodata/primary.xml.gz: [Errno -1] Metadata file does not match checksum Trying other mirror. Error: failure: repodata/primary.xml.gz from update: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. I have done yum clean all with no joy. I have two servers with CentOS-4.1 and both are exhibiting htis issue. I have not made
2018 May 15
3
centos-qemu-ev repository not work for x86_64 arch on CentOS 7.5
2018-05-15 12:38 GMT+02:00 Gena Makhomed <gmm at csdoc.com>: > Hello, Sandro! > > On 15.05.2018 13:24, Gena Makhomed wrote: > > failure: repodata/repomd.xml from centos-qemu-ev: [Errno 256] No more >> mirrors to try. >> http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common/ >> repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found >> > >
2004 Dec 14
4
Issues/thoughts re CentOS-4
This is a list of issues for discussion for CentOS-4. Most of it is based on my experience from building/maintaining CentOS-2 and observing CentOS-3. I have not seen the CentOS-4 beta yet so I don't know if any of this is already done. If these have been discussed on IRC then perhaps someone could produce a shot summary of the outcomes....? * Just call it CentOS-4 not 4.1 etc. Too