similar to: winbind on a domain with 150000 users

Hi HotSpot and LLVM developers, I am building OpenJDK8[1] with LLVM toolchain[2] for mips64el, it failed to build: /home/loongson/jdk8-mips/hotspot/src/share/vm/opto/lcm.cpp:52:35: error: ordered comparison between pointer and zero ('address' (aka 'unsigned char *') and 'int') if (Universe::narrow_oop_base() > 0) { // Implies UseCompressedOops.

Hi Thomas, Thanks for your kind response! Please review my backport for hs25, thanks a lot! diff -r 3544d85cfe11 src/share/vm/opto/lcm.cpp --- a/src/share/vm/opto/lcm.cpp Thu Jul 19 10:00:36 2018 +0100 +++ b/src/share/vm/opto/lcm.cpp Fri Jul 20 10:06:37 2018 +0800 @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ // Check whether val is not-null-decoded compressed oop, // i.e. will grab into the base of the heap

Hi LLVM developers, I am implementing Loong Language[1] using Clang FrontEnd and LLVM MiddleEnd. I add `wire`[2] Builtin Type, and clang is able to parse very small testcase fulladder[3] but failed to work for 10+K loc RISCV E203 project[4]: Loongson clang version 7.0.0 (git at github.com:Loong-Language/loong-clang.git 8f7e826f27abbe12ea08d9563490298c38d3adc1) (git at

Currently samba (2.0.6) relies on the NGROUPS_MAX define. This makes the number of allowed simultaneous (per-user) secondary groups a compile-time decision. $ find . -name \*.c | xargs grep NGROUPS ./source/lib/system.c: if (setlen > NGROUPS_MAX) { ./source/lib/replace.c: gid_t grouplst[NGROUPS_MAX]; ./source/lib/replace.c: while (i < NGROUPS_MAX &&

Hi Thomas, Looks good. Your changes in loopPredicate.cpp does not match original changes - they miss iff->is_RangeCheck() check [1]. But in JDK8 we did not have specialized RangeCheckNode class in C2. Suggested fix should be fine fro jdk 8u. Reviewed. Please, when sending RFA ( approval request) use original 8174050 bug id. Thanks, Vladimir [1]

Currently openssh (3.4p1) relies on the NGROUPS_MAX define. This makes the number of allowed simultaneous (per-user) secondary groups a compile-time decision. $ find . -name \*.c | xargs grep NGROUPS_MAX ./groupaccess.c:static char *groups_byname[NGROUPS_MAX + 1]; /* +1 for base/primary group */ ./groupaccess.c: gid_t groups_bygid[NGROUPS_MAX + 1]; ./uidswap.c:static gid_t

> *** openbsd-compat/bsd-nextstep.h.orig Sun Feb 4 00:16:16 2001 > --- openbsd-compat/bsd-nextstep.h Sun Feb 4 00:19:09 2001 > *************** > *** 48,52 **** > --- 48,56 ---- > speed_t cfgetispeed(const struct termios *t); > int cfsetospeed(struct termios *t, int speed); > int cfsetispeed(struct termios *t, int speed); > + > + /* LIMITS */ > + #define

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787 Summary: Minor security problem due to use of deprecated NGROUPS_MAX in uidswap.c (sshd) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.7.1p2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

# cat /proc/sys/kernel/ngroups_max 65536 # sysctl kernel.ngroups_max kernel.ngroups_max = 65536 Is there a way to change/look at AUTH_SYS? Seems I have 28 groups now as my user I tried created a test user with much less groups but it turns out it is on all those other groups. As such I tried winbind nested groups=no but this doesn't seem to change anything. On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:05

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787 ------- Additional Comments From openssh_bugzilla at hockin.org 2004-02-20 13:01 ------- Created an attachment (id=548) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=548&action=view) NGROUPS patch ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Hi list, I try to run imaptest, but I get the following errors (as root): # ./imaptest copybox=Trash # or any other command in http://www.imapwiki.org/ImapTest/Examples Logi List Stat Sele Fetc Fet2 Copy Stor Dele Expu Appe Logo 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 33% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 30% 5% 5% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hi, I'm trying to create a new Samba server to share files. We currently have an instance of Samba 3.6 on another server which we are using but need to retire that server. I recently set up a new AD domain on Samba 4.3.11 on Ubuntu 16.04. There are two domain controllers. Most of the PCs are joined to this AD domain. Our user accounts and group memberships are maintained in an LDAP

Hi all, I am trying to add the ShareThis Hovering buttons to my Rails 3 application but have no luck. I got the embed code from http://sharethis.com/publishers/get-hovering-buttons. In order to prove that the problem is specific to Rails, I put the same code into a HTML file outside the rails app and also a pure HTML file inside the public directory (without routed to controller) of my rails app.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3735 Bug ID: 3735 Summary: The ngroups variable may be set to a negative value when calling sysconf(_SC_NGROUPS_MAX) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.8p1 Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

> -----Original Message----- > From: G?mes G?za [mailto:geza@kzsdabas.sulinet.hu] > > I've configured for testing pruposes an other PDC with tdbsam backend, > and found, that with this backend win9x clients could get > user and group > list, while with ldapsam I had no success in it. Quite strange in my > opinion:-( Same problem here too. In 9x the userlist is

Hello, When reading the documentation regarding the fileserver configuration, I found it very handy. The idea to create a virtual share which points to a location on the fileserver. However, I may have run into a problem. What I wanted to do was to have this share point out a location and under that location, I''d create what would be a relative root. Part of the reason for this is you

# id username|sed "s/,/\n/g"|wc -l 155 # id|sed "s/,/\n/g"|wc -l 28 On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Jeff Sadowski <jeff.sadowski at gmail.com> wrote: > wbinfo -r username > shows the gid of it > and a bunch of -1's id guess for groups without gid's > my user belongs to 155 groups is there a problem with that many groups? > > On Tue, Dec 8,

ok after fighting to get my groups sorted out for my test user I created an "sudoer" group and added "jefftest" to "sudoer" > id jefftest uid=11507(jefftest) gid=8513(domain users) groups=8513(domain users),31020(sudoer) and added "sudoer" to /etc/sudoers like so %sudoer ALL=(ALL) ALL now when I login as jefftest I can run commands using sudo back to

Linux has just raised the NGROUPS_MAX limit from 32 to 64k. In doing an audit of various tools, openssh turned up as having incorrect groups handling. Almost no user-space apps really care about NGROUPS_MAX. A proposed patch (untested, since the CVS build won't compile on my RH box.. :-/) : What think? Index: uidswap.c ===================================================================

Hi, Is there a way to measure network bandwidth per process in CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core) using any utility? I was reading about nethogs but it does not have the option to run it in daemon mode so that we can take a look at historical data to figure out the process which was consuming high network bandwidth instead it is a good tool for Live monitoring. Please suggest. Thanks in