similar to: Solaris ACLs - Files Becoming Read Only

Samba 3.0.11 + acl (ext3) ------------------------- I have to second this, but actually we are seeing the same problem with Linux ACLS (ext3) and Office 97. Further investigation showed that although the acls seem to be inherited (eg the group has write access) the do not seem to be honoured with regard to the user. Let me give an example to clarify: 2 users: y,x belogn to group: mygroup

IN SHORT: - READ+WRITE becomes READ ONLY - OWNER ACL Permissions for "another User" affects Group ACL Permissions Hi Experts, we recently figured some strange behaviour on our Debian 5 (Lenny, uname 2.6.26-2-686) + Samba 2:3.2.5-4lenny14 server that i would like to discuss here. I cannot tell apart if its a bug or just lack of understanding. Here is the Scenario: I got a samba

One of our employees is having an odd problem with Adobe Photoshop. Files he saves with Photoshop are saved with permissions 777, completely ignoring both the create mask and the default ACL for the directory. Files he creates with other programs have the correct permissions. This has me stumped. It appears I can reproduce the problem at will. Client is Windows NT 4.0 SP6a and Adobe Photoshop

Hello fellow * users Hope this isn't a stupid question; I've done my research but could not find a proper answer. I have 8 different destinations which I want to match. The numbers are: ###### 00 ###### 20 ###### 30 ###### 40 ###### 15 ###### 35 ###### 12 ###### 44 Right now I've solved it by doing this: exten => _######[0234]0,1,HangUp exten => _######[13]5,1,HangUp exten

I have two users on my network, Mary and Bob, who work together in a shared share. They both belong to the group Accounting. Bob is a savvy Linux user who accesses the share via NFS4. Mary toils away using Windows accessing the share via the Samba server. Mary will create a directory on the share and dump a number of files in which Bob and Mary will split the load. Bob, being a LInux user, will

On 21/06/2019 17:41, Edouard Guign? via samba wrote: > hello, > > My 2nd issue is about acls which are added by "Domain users". > May you help me to solve it again ? > > Concerning this issue, on my samba share, I set permissions for the > share "groups" located on /var/datashared for "domain admins" (rwx) > and "domain users" (r-x)

Hi, i have two DCs and they are replicate find. No errors. I use rsync to replicate the sysvol folder. If I have a Windows 7 Machine over time it both DCs are used to load the GPOs. When the Second DCs is used I get a GPO error. I found that the folders and files are not with the correct xattr acls. I user rsync with -X to sync xattr acls. I sed getfacl to compare the uids. I use sernet 4.1.9 but

I've set up a profiles share according to the wiki article: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Implementing_roaming_profiles Users are able to create new roaming profiles and they cannot browse each others' profiles, so all that is working. The only issue is that the group "domain admins" does not have privileges to read or delete user profiles. The acls on the profiles directory

Hi! We're using sernet-samba 3.0.28-21 on debian. (The smb.conf can be found below) There are 2 subfolders in root share directory "ponudbe" and "projects": srv03:/srv/data/test# getfacl * # file: ponudbe # owner: root # group: root user::rwx user:COMPANY+administrator:rwx group::r-x group:COMPANY+ponudbe_rw:rwx mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx

Hi, I have a problem with the removal of inheritance ACLs of subdirectories. It almost sounds like only adding ACLs work but removals of inheritance ACL's not. By default the access rights (including ACLs) should be inherited, but it should also be possible to remove the access rights from any subdirectory. This is what I am trying to do, I have a share called media with some users /

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 12:19:09 -0700 Mark Nienberg via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I've set up a profiles share according to the wiki article: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Implementing_roaming_profiles > > Users are able to create new roaming profiles and they cannot browse > each others' profiles, so all that is working. The only issue is that >

Everyone, I have finally resolved the new heartburn 3.0.24 on Ubuntu Feisty was giving me and have stumbled upon some information that might help others out there. I was seeing problems with ACL entries getting mangled and disappearing, Excel making files read only and extended attributes doing bizarre things. The solution revolved around what appears to be a change in how ACLs are managed.

Hi guys, we are using samba 3.0.4 as domain member server (security=ADS) in our Active Directory Domain. In order not to compromise social peace, we use POSIX ACLs in conjunction with the hide unreadable option to hide folders/files from users. I'll show you an example to explain the problem: I'm the user "SCHARRNET+M006U122" (SCHARRNET=domain suffix). I'm connecting to

On 10/08/15 20:51, Andrew Martin wrote: > I have a samba share (using Samba 3.6.3) running on an ext4 filesystem with the > "acl" mount option. The samba share is configured as follows: > [myshare] > path = /srv/myshare > browseable = no > public = no > guest ok = no > writable = yes > printable = no > create mode = 0660 >

[global] netbios name = aphrodite security = ADS workgroup = SAMDOM realm = AD.SAMDOM.COM.AU log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log log level = 1 dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab kerberos method = secrets and keytab winbind refresh tickets = yes winbind trusted domains only = no winbind use default domain = yes

Hello! I have direstory with following acl: getfacl Visio2002 # file: Visio2002 # owner: ilyin # group: ilyin user::rwx user:dm:rwx user:pitomtsev:rwx user:nap:rwx user:mav:rwx user:goi:rwx user:ilyin:rwx user:huzyahmetov:rwx group::r-x group:common:r-x mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:user:pitomtsev:rwx default:user:nap:rwx default:user:mav:rwx default:user:goi:rwx

Hello, I recently upgraded from centos release 7.3 to 7.4 and samba 4.6.2 and noticed that when files/folders are added or manipulated from a windows PC via the share, extra ACLs get applied and i cannot figure out why. Nothing has changed configuration wise and i have tried all variations i can think of of different map settings, downgraded several releases of samba (4.4.4 failed to load due to

Hi, i have setup an ad dc with samba 4.8, and then rigorously followed wiki tutorial at : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs However, when following the last part (File System ACLs in the Back End), I don't get the expected results : [root at mydc ~]# getfattr -d /srv/samba/Demo/ doesn't yield anything and getfacl /srv/samba/Demo/ getfacl : suppression

hi If i create a new file x.txt, samba sets the permission of the group users to rwx. "inherit acls" is set to yes. Why samba sets the permission to rwx instead of rw (the default permission of the parent) ? New file: getfacl --tabular x.txt # file: x.txt USER xxxxx rw- GROUP users rwx group leiters rwx mask rwx other --- Parent directory:

Hi everybody, I know this has been discussed ad naseum, but I can't find an answer to my question precisely. My version of samba is 4.2.10. Here's my question. I have POSIX ACLs set on a directory like this: # file: . # owner: root # group: admin # flags: -s- user::rwx user:apache:rwx group::rwx group:admin:rwx mask::rwx other::r-x default:user::rwx default:user:apache:rwx