similar to: samba 3 performance

Hi All, I'm running netbench against our samba based filer and having I believe a controller problem. When I configure the test to run multiple engines per client (about 5 in my case) and about 20 clients so all together I have 100 engines, the controller crashes. My clients are a mix of NT4, winxp and win2000 systems. If I run the controller on windows 2003, the controller simply

Subject isn't exactly samba, but samba people usually know a lot about windows bat scripting. Here's my problem: Currently our domain login script is doing this (among other things): ifmember.exe "WINDOWS-DOMAIN\Projects" if errorlevel 1 ( net use p: \\server1\projects ) This works fine. The problem is I'm moving the projects storage to a different server called server 2

I have a file server with windows and I am creating a new Fedora Core 3 + Samba 3.0.10-1.fc3 file server... But i have many, many files that have chars like ?, ?, ? in their name... When I move the files to the Samba server, all that unicode chars are changed to ? I need a solution for that to move on, because my boss will not like to stop using that chars... Thanks for any help Cristian

I've got a pair of identical CentOS 6.7 servers, with SuperMicro X8DTE-F motherboards, these have 2 each Intel 82574L ethernet ports. The eth0 ports are plugged in with 10' runs of brand new cat 5e cable to a Cisco Nexxus 9000 switch (provided by the data center). These servers keep coming up at 100baseT rather than gigE. I've swapped ports and cables with a different server,

Hi everybody! I've been noticing some strange entries in samba/utmp. I have a lot of 00:00 timed sessions. But the worst problem is that i found some conflicting information. Since windows doesn't allow concurrent login sessions, I think utmp should not have generated the following entries. liana smb/2 192.168.0.207 Fri Sep 2 18:43 - 00:52 (06:08) rodrigobaso

Change your security from ads to server security = ADS to server Mark Sarria ----- Original Message ----- From: IslandBwoy <IslandBwoy@ToughGuy.net> Date: Wednesday, March 9, 2005 2:17 pm Subject: [Samba] Domain Control > Hi all, > > I have a simple problem that i cant seem to figure out. Right now > i have > most of my confs in place to join my samba server to my

I will be upgrading my Samba server from 2.2.8a to 3.0.10. I currently have security set to 'share' and plan on migrating to 'ads' for improved authentication. I have one snag, though... I have remote users who reside in and are managed by a Windows domain that is not in my control. There is no trust relationship at all. If I use 'ads' security, can I add a 'valid

Dear best guys, I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer rates, after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet Cards to solve my performance problem (*laugh*): (In short, see *** below) Tests were done with two Intel GigaBit Ethernet cards (82547EI, 32bit PCI Desktop adapter MT) connected directly without a switch/hub and "device

Hi, I happened to delete /etc/samba/secrets.tdb. Now I can not get DOMAIN SID by run: net getlocalsid Any idea how to recover it? Do I need to reinstall the whole Samba suite? -- Regards, Steve Zeng Systems Administrator Mainframe Entertainment Inc T: (604) 628-1000 ext 5293

A few days ago I upgraded from 3.0.2 to 3.0.9, and since the upgrade, the winbindd_idmap.tdb has not ever been modified, even after several restarts of samba, and reboots of the system in question. It appears that the UID mapping is still correct on the samba server, but I am just concerned that new user additions etc are not being stored to the tdb files. winbind_cache.tdb is being updated with

Using Samba 3.0.9-Debian on Linspire 5.0.59. Server running is a Windows 2003 Server. I am trying to mount a share on the server but getting error message: cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have disabled it. 8919: protocol negotiation failed SMB connection failed In smb.conf I have changed setting "server signing = no" to "server signing = required" but

Hello, if I copy or create a file or directory, it inherits the permissions of it's parent. If I move a file from one directory to another, it will not inherit the permissions of the target-directory. Why? [daten] comment = Daten path = /samba/daten inherit permissions = yes inherit ACLS = yes nt acl support = no writeable = yes hide

I have the following network configuration: Server FreeBSD 6.2 P4 3Ghz, 1GB RAM Samba 3.0.24 (options: WITH_ADS, WITH_PAM, WITH_SENDFILE, WITH_UTMP, WITH_WINBIND) Standard FreeBSD NFS Server Adaptec 2410SA controller with 4 drives running RAID5 Broadcom GigE Client Windows XP MCE Microsoft SFU 3.5 running NFS client over UDP The client and the server are

Hi, I'm running Samba 3.0.11 on RedHat ES 3 kernel version 2.4.21-15.0.4.ELsmp and have a quick question about AD group membership limits Am I right in assuming that Samba is limited by the group membership parameters (ie NGROUP = 32) imposed by the Linux kernel? Is there any workaround in Samba for this? At the moment if a user is a member of more then 32 domain groups they cannot access

I have a beefy machine (Intel dual-quad core, 16GB memory 2 x GigE) I have loaded RHEL5.1-xen on the hardware and have created two logical systems: 4 cpus, 7.5 GB memory 1 x Gige Following RHEL guidelines, I have it set up so that eth0->xenbr0 and eth1->xenbr1 Each of the two RHEL5.1 guests uses one of the interfaces and this is verified at the switch by seeing the unique MAC addresses.

Hi, I'm a happy Samba user. I've been working sucessfully in Linux for the past 6 months. I've built a Linux Server with very fast storage and I'm connecting it to many Windows XP "video editing workstations" via Gigabit Ethernet (all NICs using Jumbo Frames, by the way). Now I want to see if I can increase my data flow in and out of the Server so that more

I have encountered a problem so I am posting this question to both the technical list as well as the normal user list for a solution. When I initially joined the samba box to the Win2k domain as a member server I followed the Samba 3 HOWTO and specified the OU in the Active Directory. After speaking with our boss this is not the correct OU for the users we need to authenticate. My question

Hi folks :-) situation: debian stable (samba version 2:3.2.5-4lenny9) from clients by ftp the transfer of huge file is about 10/11Mb/s (with an ethernet 10/100) by samba came 5/6Mb/s is it correct? In smb.conf I don't have any "strange"options: thanks Pol domain master = yes preferred master = yes os level = 65 workgroup = WORKGROUP netbios name = name Server String = name

Folks, I'm trying to add a network interface card to my SUSE 9.3 box, and I'm not having much luck with a US Robotics version. What manufacturer do any of you use in your machines--either 10/100MB or GigE NIC? Thanks Eric Hines There is no nonsense so errant that it cannot be made the creed of the vast majority by adequate governmental action. --Bertrand Russell

On 10/11/2016 9:03 PM, Ashish Yadav wrote: > Please test that if both the server are communicating with each other at > 1Gbps or not via "iperf" tool. > > If above gives result of 1Gbps then it will eliminate the NICs problem then > you know that it is a problem with cisco switch only. after they forced the cisco ports to gigE, I was seeing 200-400Mbps in iPerf, which