similar to: Shares of Logged Out Users Still Visible By Next User

Hi, I am running Samba 3.6.19 and making my way through all the Active Directory documentation. I have joined various Linux boxes to a Windows Server 2008 R2 Active Directory domain. Windows 7 users who log on with their domain accounts can mount the correct shares exported by the Linux boxes without having to supply any additional credentials. All working perfectly! However, I have a

I have been struggling with SAMBA for about a month now. Wow, as a Windows user it's really infuriating trying to use SAMBA to put a Linux machine in my system. This is clearly the most frustrating aspect of Linux, in my opinion. All I want to do is make my Linux machine behave like any other Windows XP Professional machine in my office (I do confess, one of my employees brings in her

I have spent most of the past 24 hours reading various samba docs and searching google for help -- but can't find a solution. Suggestions and solutions would be appreciated. I have set up a Linux Box (Samba 3.02) as a PDC with roaming profiles. (I haven't upgraded, because this box is a model for over 100 other boxes in the field). I can add XP users to the domain and their roaming

Hi, Is there a simple way to set up Samba so that users ONLY see the shares that belong to them? I'm not talking about the user's HOME directory. But lets say I have 60 shares in my smb.conf file. To make it less confusing for users when they access the Samba server from Windows, I want the users to ONLY see the shares that belong to them. So, I want to set up each share so that

I have (more than) three subnets: A: all unix (I think) B: mixed unix and PC's C: all PC's (I think) I have a samba server on both A and B. They have essentially identical configurations. Both are running the nmbd daemon, and are configured as workgroup = XXSAMBA. I have a PC on C. Both net view /domain:XXSAMBA and network neighborhood show only the server on B. I assumed that

I have written to this list several times. I purchased the Officia SAMBA 3 How-To and Reference Guide (and read much of it). But I can't get a good answer to my question. I'm trying to figure out the difference between "inherited permissions" and "force/create mask/directory", and other actions like "force user" and "force group" (it seems I

I have a vector of size 217 called "A". the values of A are not sorted and range from 0 to 1 (normalized) I am having difficulty writing a program to create a new vector "B" where if A's value is 0< A <=0.333 then B is 0 if A's value is 0.333< A <=0.666 then B is 1 if A's value is 0.666< A <=1 then B is 2 so if A is 0.22 0.999 0.444 0 B would

Does somebody know if the Samba Client in MAC OS X (10.3.4 and 10.3.5) has problems looking at Linux-based Samba shares that are larger than 2 TB? I have Samba 3.0.2 running on my Linux box. I have never had any difficulty with the Mac seeing a 2 TB RAID array on the Linux box, but when the Mac looks at the 4 TB array, it can see all the contents and create folders but it can't create

I have a different Samba and Mac OS 10.3 question. I have a small network in my office with a Linux box acting as a file server, mostly Windows XP clients, and a couple of Macs. When I create Samba shares on the Linux box, I have no problem getting my Windows XP users to be able to read and write to the shares. The login name and password on the XP boxes are the same as the corresponding

Building on my last message, I am trying to get CHANNEL data using getvar (through the AMI). And although I'm getting responses, some values returned seem illogical. For example, phone 111 calls phone 222 via the PBX. Here's the data I get back Channel A: "1688509741.112" , name: "PJSIP/111-00000064" , is originator: Y , call-Id: "u.l6kcou25cax60 at

On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 7:52 PM TTT <lists at telium.io> wrote: > Building on my last message, I am trying to get CHANNEL data using getvar > (through the AMI). And although I'm getting responses, some values > returned seem illogical. For example, phone 111 calls phone 222 via the > PBX. Here's the data I get back > > > > > > Channel A:

Channel A: "1688509741.112" , name: "PJSIP/111-00000064" , is originator: Y , call-Id: "u.l6kcou25cax60 at mydomain.com <mailto:u.l6kcou25cax60 at mydomain.com> " , local_uri: "<sip:222 at mydomain.com <mailto:sip%3A222 at mydomain.com> ;user=phone>" , local_tag: "1734d973-c4da-4ae8-a37d-5f7065f1fe54" , local_addr:

The desired result is that user A's phone rings; when he picks it up, user B is dialled, and user A's channel is connected to that. (This is to be a back-end for a web-based address book.)

I've just reconfigured my Samba 3 setup so that Windows users basically only see shares they are supposed to see when they browse the Samba server through Explorer. At the suggestion of others on this list, I used the "include = /etc/samba/smb.%U.conf" feature and create a "smb.username.conf" file for each Linux user. To get Explorer to display the shares assigned to

Hi, I am trying to optimize my gigabit network. I have two Intel 1000 MT Gigabit Server Adapters, which support Jumbo Frames -- as well as a Switch that supports Jumbo Frames. However, I am observing some strange behavior in my file transfers from Windows XP to Linux and I am wondering if it has anything to do with the way the Samba variables are set on my Linux box? The "strange

Do anyone have any experience using 10 Gigabit Ethernet connections with Samba? Specifically, if you have had such an experience, can you share what sorts of optimizations you made to get the maximum data transfer between server and workstation? I am just experimenting with this kind of setup myself and I see a huge GULF between the raw TCP/IP transfers that I can make between two

Can anybody explain why SOME Windows XP applications have trouble writing files larger than 2 GB (or sometimes larger than 4 GB) to Linux Samba shares, when OTHER Windows applications on the same machine do not have difficulty writing large files to the same Samba share? And when the underlying Linux filesystem supports very large files? I have sometimes even found that a SINGLE Windows

Hi list, I'm planning and testing a distributed asterisk deployment throughout several sites; each will be connected to the PSTN and all of them among themselves via IAX trunks. Phones will be SIP. I guess I already "solved" (worked-around, actually) asterisk's codec negotiation limitations regarding local G.711 utilization vs. remote G.729 while minimizing

Hi, Lars Thanks for your suggestion, will give it a try later to see how it performs. But, yesterday, I did a below test: A ConnectTo B and C, B ConnectTo D, C ConnectTo D; All nodes turned "IndirectData" on in its host configuration, so the tunnel only follow metacomnection instead of direct connect. D announced default route by having the Subnet = 0.0.0.0/0 statement in its host

Dear R's! I am strugling with cancor procedure in R. I cannot figure out the meaning of xcoef and of yxcoef. Are these: 1. standardized coefficients 2. structural coefficients 3. something else? I have tried to simulate canonical correlation analysis by checking the eigenstructure of the expression: Sigma_xx %*% Sigma_xy %*% Sigma_yy %*% t(Sigma_xy). The resulting eigenvalues were the same