similar to: SLES9 Module '/usr/lib/samba/vfs/audit.so' loaded, Can't find a vfs module [/usr/lib/samba/vfs/audit.so]

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "SLES9 Module '/usr/lib/samba/vfs/audit.so' loaded, Can't find a vfs module [/usr/lib/samba/vfs/audit.so]"

2004 May 18
1
Problem with VFS audit and recycle (fwd)
This problem continues under 3.0.4 on Solaris 8 - attempting to use the "vfs object" parameter in a share prevents access to the share and results in the following in the log files: [2004/05/10 16:04:57, 0] lib/module.c:do_smb_load_module(57) Error trying to resolve symbol 'init_module' in /usr/local/lib/vfs/audit.so: ld.so.1: /usr/local/sbin/smbd: fatal:
2004 May 11
1
BUG: Vfs audit module & samba 3.0.4 ==> share unacces sible
add to each share writeable = yes or read-only = no This Helps! Rauno -----Original Message----- From: werner maes [mailto:werner.maes@cc.kuleuven.ac.be] Sent: 11. mai 2004. a. 16:19 To: samba@samba.org Subject: [Samba] BUG: Vfs audit module & samba 3.0.4 ==> share unaccessible Hello Maybe there's a bug in samba-3.0.4. The following configuration does NO longer work. It did
2003 Oct 08
0
Problem with VFS audit e recycle
I have compiled samba 3.0 on solaris 8 with default options. It's ok. I have problem with the parameters vfs objects. This is my smb.conf Global parameters [global] workgroup = SAMBATESTPDC netbios name = samba3sun preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes wins support = Yes domain logons = yes local master = yes
2004 May 11
0
BUG: Vfs audit module & samba 3.0.4 ==> share unaccessible
Hello Maybe there's a bug in samba-3.0.4. The following configuration does NO longer work. It did work fine in samba-3.0.2a. I did not test samba-3.0.3 The share is no longer accessible !!! [BKHI-CC3] path = /home/BKHI-CC3 valid users = @BKHI-CC3-R, @BKHI-CC3-W write list = @BKHI-CC3-W force group = +BKHI-CC3-W create mask = 0664
2004 Dec 27
0
3.0.10 vfs problem with file_ext_map
Hi, I'm having Problem in getting the file_ext_map (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/file-ext-map/file_ext_map3/file_ext_map3.c?rev=1.2) vfs modules running with samba 3.0.10. I'm trying the cvs-version of the module which was originally coded for samba 3.0.0. It compiles fine against current samba code, but when I try to use it samba complains that it can't find the vfs
2005 Feb 22
1
Problems with VFS Recycle on SLES9
Hi list, I have running samba 3.0.9 on a SuSE Enterprise-Server 9 with Kernel 2.6.5. Samba works very well but In have one problem while using the recycle vfs with samba: when I save a file (with wordpad or editor ...) to the network-share, a 0 byte-file will automaticly be saved to the trash-folder. After removing the file from the network-share, the real file (>0 byte) will be stored to
2004 Aug 26
5
3.0.6 and pam_winbind problems (sernet)?
Recently I upgraded a server from samba 3.0.2a to 3.0.6, and now apache won't authenticate properly with pam_winbind. Winbind's been restarted, apache has been restarted, for grins I even rebooted the server. >From /var/log/messages: Aug 26 10:24:51 linps2 pam_winbind[654]: user 'jarboed' granted acces >From apache's error log: [Thu Aug 26 10:24:51 2004] [error] (2)No
2002 Jul 03
2
2.2.5 - SOl 2.8 - Recycle Bin VFS
Hi I've compiled and installed 2.2.5 on a Solaris 2.8 box. When attempting to browse the workgroup, a popup messages is displayed: Simple is not accessible. A device attached to the system is not functioning If I check the log file, the following error messages show up: ............ Jul 3 10:08:26 serv03 smbd[1544]: [ID 702911 daemon.error] [2002/07/03 10:08:26, 0]
2010 Mar 13
2
vfs module Samba 3.5.1
We installed the Samba 3.5.1 rpms for OpenSuSE 10.2 from ftp.sernet.de. The VFS modules seem to be broken. Is this an error in the packaging or do I need to be looking else where. A snippet from the log file follows: <extracted from log> [2010/03/12 19:58:59, 0, pid=28792, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] smbd/vfs.c:66(smb_register_vfs) Failed to register vfs module. The module
2004 Apr 06
0
vfs module load
Hello All, Trying to use audit vfs module with samba 3.0.2a, but no luck. I get the following log: [2004/04/06 13:07:45, 3] smbd/vfs.c:vfs_init_default(203) Initialising default vfs hooks [2004/04/06 13:07:45, 3] smbd/vfs.c:vfs_init_custom(229) Initialising custom vfs hooks from [/usr/lib/samba/vfs/audit.so] Probing module '/usr/lib/samba/vfs/audit.so' [2004/04/06 13:07:45, 0]
2003 Dec 11
1
samba 3.0 vfs module problem
Hello First I prepared mks_vir Daemon, necessary libraries and modules, everything work fine (I can scan files for vireses from the command line) after that I had install samba from source next I copies and modyfying necessary mks configuration file like /etc/samba/vscan-mks32.conf and add to /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf following lines in global section: vfs object =
2005 Feb 08
1
FC3 vfs object smb.conf samba 3.0.11
When Kaspersky adds the following to smb.conf I can't connect from XP. If I comment out "vfs object" connection is restored. <snip> [store-00] # ADDED BY KASPERSKY ANTI-VIRUS FOR SAMBA SERVERS 5.0 vfs object = kavsamba5-smb-3.0.2 comment = File Directories path = /store-00 browseable = yes writeable = yes valid users = frank read only = no
2010 Jun 14
1
Samba 3.4.6 - problems with vfs objects = recycle
Hi, I just upgraded samba from 3.0.37 to 3.4.6 on a gentoo machine. After converting the passwd file (pdbedit -i smbpasswd -e tdbsam) I tried to login from a windows client but it didn''t work. After commenting the vfs-recycle entries in the shares definition I could successfully login. I cannot find any hint that the vfs objects in samba 3.4 has changed. Can somebody help? Thanks in
2010 Jun 15
0
Samba 3.4.6 - problems with vfs object recycle
Hi, I just upgraded samba from 3.0.37 to 3.4.6 on a gentoo machine. After converting the passwd file (pdbedit -i smbpasswd -e tdbsam) I tried to login from a windows client but it didn''t work. After commenting the vfs-recycle entries in the shares definition I can successfully login. I cannot find any hint that the vfs objects in samba 3.4 has changed compared to 3.0.x. Can somebody
2004 May 27
1
Problem with VFS audit and recycle
Is there anyone running Samba 3.0.X on Solaris 8 that has VFS working? I am dying to know if this is a problem with my setup or if there is something else going on. If you do have it working, please let me know which module. Thanks. Bill Knox Lead Operating Systems Programmer/Analyst The MITRE Corporation ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 13:54:26 -0400
2005 Jul 04
1
Unable to get recycle to work
I have this one remaining issue before I can declare my Samba rollout to be successful. I have been trying to implement the recycle feature. My server is a Dell Intel, with Redhat Enterprise 3.0 Linux and Samba 3.0.14 (I believe I have all the string and the periods in the right place). Here is the recycle configuration I have for a share, as my test: [contractors] comment = Contractors
2012 Jan 19
1
Samba-vscan Problem
Dear All, I have upgrade my samba from 3.0.33 to 3.3.3, that proces are success but I have a problem for samba-vscan. Error : [2012/01/16 10:32:00.074547, 0] smbd/vfs.c:167(vfs_init_custom) error probing vfs module 'vscan-clamav': NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL [2012/01/16 10:32:00.074559, 0] smbd/vfs.c:309(smbd_vfs_init) smbd_vfs_init: vfs_init_custom failed for vscan-clamav [2012/01/16
2005 Oct 25
2
Support for SLES9
Support for SLES9 seems to be pretty much lacking at the moment. The OCFS2 site [1] states OCFS2 is supported with SP2+. There actually does not exist a SP2+ for SLES9 (or should this rather read "will be supported in SP3" instead?). Latest RPMs that come with SLES9 SP2 are 0.99.14 which has critical known bugs and is unusable. Anybody got to compile current source on SLES9 x86_64?
2004 Nov 30
1
ocfs on sles9
Haven't really tried this yet, but I'm wondering what the direction is for official ocfs support on SLES9. Anyone know if there are plans to support OCFS 1.x on sles9 at some point? I know it's a 2.6 kernel instead of 2.4... thanks, Jeremy This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual(s) and purpose, and is protected
2005 Aug 03
1
Documentation clarification re: SLES9 and nsswitch
Hello, I've been unable to succeed with Samba-Ldap setup on SLES9 until this evening. I thought I had a PAM issue but that was not the case. To cut to the chase, I ran Yast's 'ldap-server' module without any changes as it found the ldap server settings. Once finished I could join the domain from XP Pro which is what I was unable to do. I checked what Yast did and it reset