similar to: Ver 3.0.4 Anonymous access, no Password required

Originally I posted this question at CentOS forum 20.12.2018. https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=69193 Hi all, I am not able to mount samba shares after upgrading CentOS 7.5 to 7.6. I have been searching and trying to configure samba and winbind but no success. I find a lot of manuals and help pages about setting samba and winbind for machine acting as AD DC member but

Hi folks, From my RedHat Linux box Im using smbclient L to obtain the list of shares on a particular computer in the network. I use guest as user name or just omit the user name. I can get the list of shares on every single Linux or Win9X machines in the network but I cannot obtain the list of shares on Win2000 and Win NT machines. Here is what I tried: [user1@linuxbox user1]$ smbclient

Hello all, Got samba with AD integration and extended ACL up and running. Here is what I am trying to do. share1 in smb.conf: [share1] comment = share1 path = /mnt/data/share1 public = no writable = yes printable = no valid users = @DOMAIN+group1 user1 and user2 are members of group1 user3 is not user1 creates

I have so far set up my samba server successfully with winbind and using an NT4 PDC. I can get to my shares and when I create a file or directory the owner and group for the file appears as MYDOMAIN+USER1 MYDOMAIN+Domain Users I am using winbind seperator = + [Share1] comment = Share1 path = /Share1 read only = no public = yes My problem is how do I set up a share so that

Good morning. I am using samba 3.0 on RedHat Linux 9.0 and Linux machine is having lot of users and groups . I am trying to solve a problem. I have created, for example, 10 shares ( each share is having different valid users and groups ) and I can access only 4 of them (I have rights to read or write only for 4 shares). Well, is it possible to hide to my browsing the 6 shares that I can not

Hi all, I'm fighting with samba on a new CentOS 5.1 install. The goal here is to have unix/linux usernames/passwords used for the samba shares (which i'll setup using webmin, as I find it easy that way). At present, the home share and one for the company's public share are in place. I can see the server, browsing from WinXP to \\172.16.0.106, but permissions seem amiss. I

i'm not sure how to create different logon scripts for different users. right now i have one logon script called 'logon.bat' that maps all users to a server share and syncs the time with the server. i need to be able to map different users to different server shares. not all users should be mapped to all server shares. these should be automatic mappings. for example: user1 should

On 12/21/18 12:15 PM, Miroslav Geisselreiter wrote: > Thanks for tip, Kenneth. > Please find proper formatted logs here: > https://pastebin.com/eXfNWBLu This looks like a discussion of a similar problem.? There are two suggested solutions: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/454004/smbclient-not-able-to-connect-to-after-upgrade-to-rhel7

We restored to 3.0.23d after update to 3.0.25a because of strange dfs behavior. the detailed situation: on msdfs root server 'samba' ls -lR dfsroot/: drwxr-xr-x appl1 dfsroot/appl1 lrwxrwxrwx share1 -> msdfs:server1\share1 [dfs] comment = "SaMBa DFS root" path = /path.../dfsroot # next line does not work prior 3.0.25 !!! # hide unreadable = Yes

/etc/samba/user_and_group_map.txt contains Windows username/group to linux username/group mappings. In our setup, all users exist in ldap, as do the directory groups, but the linux user and group information (namely uid/gid) do not. This has been setup such that the users connect to samba as the windows username (ex. PRODUCTION+user1) for an authroized group (PRODUCTION+group1), but the files

Hello, i got some clients (WINDOWS7 and WINDOWS10) to connect to samba shares. OS is openSUSE 12.2; 13.1; 42.1 Samba-Version: 3.6.7; 4.1.22; 4.2.4 smb.conf is shown below. The samba setup is a workgroup setup, the W7-clients are set up to the workgroup 'workgroup'. No further changes are made to the W7-clients. samba setup: groupadd workgroup chgrp -R workgroup /srv/samba chmod -R 770

Hi, I'm trying to set up one of my users to be a domain admin. I have unix/ldap group called "domainadm" with "user1" a member of the group. When I run "net groupmap list" I get the following: Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-186220259-3826000728-3192352269-7033) -> domainadm But when I go to log in to the domain with "user1" on a winxp machine, the

Hello, I recently compiled Samba 2.06 on my SCO open server box. Besides one minor warning, not real problems there. It's running, I can use the swat interface but I can not get it to do the one simple thing I need it to do. I want to have one share on my SCO box. Accessible from both windows 95 and 98. I want absolutely no security. Right now I can see the SCO box in my network

Hi, I've searched the HOWTO and searched with Google for an answer to my problem but to no avail. I hope it's not too obvious. I have a Linux box running Samba 3.0.4 and a Windows XP Home box on my local network. I would like to share the home directories on the linux box and I would also like a share that is accessible anonymously with no password. My smb.conf contains the

I have 2 different shares one with [Share1] valid users = @"DOMAINA+Domain Users" [Share2] valid users = @"DOMAINA+SpecialGroup" Members of the latter group cannot access Share2. No one can. #getent group |grep Special DOMAINA+SpecialGroup:x:10001:DOMAINA+User1,DOMAINA+User2,DOMAINA+User3 #wbinfo -g |grep Special DOMAINA+SpecialGroup I changed the

A sysadmin moved a share from one Windows server to another. I am now getting error 13 when trying to mount the share from the new server. The following worked before the server was replaced: mount.cifs //ipaddress1/share1$ /mnt/share1 -o credientials/home/whatever/.smbcredentials,rw mount.cifs //ipaddress2/share2$ /mnt/share2 -o credientials/home/whatever/.smbcredentials,ro Change: server

Hello.. File server freebsd 6.2-STABLE + samba-3.0.25a + ldap + acls Problem: I've a situation where file locking does not seem to be functioning as expected, in that more than one user can open and write to a file without any notifications being displayed about the file already being opened by another user. I have two Windows XP clients accessing the same shared file, user1 has the file

All, On our main file server, all our home directorys are automount points. So /home isn't a real filesystem area, it points to a bunch of different home areas based on the auto.direct table. Example: /home/user1 mounts from --> /export/home1/user1 /home/user2 mounts from --> /export/home2/user2 /home/user3 mounts from --> /export/home2/user3 /home/user4 mounts from -->

I have a very small problem. Thanks for any suggestions. Say user1 logs onto a Windows XP workstation and opens file1. Then, if user2 attempts to open the file from another workstation the following message is displayed: "file1 is locked for editing by ''" Problem: *user1* is not displayed between the single quotes. However, say user1 logs onto a Win98 workstation and

Most of you will probably think about this "It's not a real problem". But not my boss. I want to exchange our Netware server with a linux/SMABA one but my boss wants to have on the new server exactly the same directories structure like in the Netware server. And here it is what I couldn't done : user X wich have two secondary groups Y and Z must browse in Win95 _only_ the Y and