similar to: winbind and distribution groups - solved

Hello all! Say, I create a "distribution group" on Windows ADS named "distgroup" add as a member a security group named "secgroup" with a user "robert" in it. Then when I look at the groups "robert" belongs to, the group "distgroup" is not listed (checked with "wbinfo -r"). Even after "winbind cache time" has long

Release Announcements ===================== This is the first release candidate of Samba 4.20.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.20 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the first release candidate of Samba 4.20.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.20 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Hello, I've submitted the following to the bug tracking system, but thought I might find some other answers here. It appears that there is a bug in the ACL code that prevents a ACL or DACL from being applied to directory if the user associated with that ACL is the owner of the file. Consider the following directory structure top->| |->a| |->1 | |->2 |

Release Announcements ===================== This is the second release candidate of Samba 4.20.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.20 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the second release candidate of Samba 4.20.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.20 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the third release candidate of Samba 4.20.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.20 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the third release candidate of Samba 4.20.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.20 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the fourth release candidate of Samba 4.20.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.20 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the fourth release candidate of Samba 4.20.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.20 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the first stable release of the Samba 4.20 release series. Please read the release notes carefully before upgrading. NEW FEATURES/CHANGES ==================== New Minimum MIT Krb5 version for Samba AD Domain Controller ----------------------------------------------------------- Samba now requires MIT 1.21 when built against a system MIT Krb5

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the first stable release of the Samba 4.20 release series. Please read the release notes carefully before upgrading. NEW FEATURES/CHANGES ==================== New Minimum MIT Krb5 version for Samba AD Domain Controller ----------------------------------------------------------- Samba now requires MIT 1.21 when built against a system MIT Krb5

actually touches the ACLs for newly created files and directories. smbd only seems to manipulate ACLs when they're changed from a windows client. 3. The "inherit acls" config option does not fix this problem, which is not surprising since that's not what the option is intended to do. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C260B4.8812FA00 Content-Type: text/html;

Thank you Andrew and Rowland. (Rowland - I tried 'samba-tool dsacl get', thank you! but found the output hard to decipher so I used ldp.exe on Windows instead in the end) On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 20:22, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 2023-11-22 at 17:33 +0000, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > > Are permissions checked in a hiearchical fashion, i.e. if

Hello Maximilian, I think may be cause by MTU proble if you have many peer. you can run tincd with -d 5 or tincd -n "yournetname" -k INT , check the log file to see what happen. if so, you can use my patch to fix this. thanks PHB On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 7:00 PM <tinc-request at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > Send tinc mailing list submissions to > tinc at tinc-vpn.org

Hi, > The problem I see is that the warning isn't very actionable. Fully agreed. > Good warnings are supposed to be actionable, but what is the developer supposed to do in this case? This diagnostic is unclear. But to be more precise, the first part says the optimisation could not be performed. This is spot on, and an improvement of what we had before because that didn't issue

Mapping between Windows DACLs and Posix user-group-other file permissions is complex, depends on externalities, and is necessarily lossy: http://www.cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-filemodes.html http://www.cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/ntsec.html While there's a lot of information at those links, they don't completely explain how the mapping works. (And who knows if GnuWin32 does the mapping

This is release 0.9.48 of Wine, a free implementation of Windows on Unix. What's new in this release: - Still more fixes for regression test failures. - Much more complete cryptnet implementation. - WIDL is now able to generate the oleaut32 proxy code. - Lots of bug fixes. Because of lags created by using mirrors, this message may reach you before the release is available at the

> -----Original Message----- > From: meinersbur at googlemail.com [mailto:meinersbur at googlemail.com] On > Behalf Of Michael Kruse > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 1:18 PM > To: Song, Ruiling <ruiling.song at intel.com> > Cc: Michael Kruse <llvm at meinersbur.de>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > Subject: Re: Possible bug of Alias Analysis? > > 2017-10-18

AliasAnalysis and dependence analysis answer different problems. AA check whether two memory ranges accessed at the same time (i.e. in the same iteration) do not overlap. DI checks when two accesses, not necessarily executed in the same iteration, do overlap. DI makes use of AA in verifying that the base pointer (with unknown size), at the beginning of the loop, themselves do not overlap. If they