similar to: mount a share on a W2k server

> good morging, > > I need to install R-2.x on my host: > > Linux, 2.6.5-7.308-smp #1 SMP Mon Dec 10 11:36:40 UTC 2007 x86_64 > x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > now I have check the packages on your document: > http://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/suse/ReadMe.html > but I have a problem whit xorg-x11-lib, in my host I have installed > package:

hello I want to know about therotical basis of Kriging in elemantary level. I will appreciate if anyone sends me address,link,e-documents, etc.. kind regards -- Ahmet Temiz General Directory of Disaster Affairs Ankara TURKEY ______________________________________ Inflex - installed on mailserver for domain @deprem.gov.tr Queries to: postmaster at deprem.gov.tr

RedHat 7.1 running FreeS/WAN and Samba 2.0.10 connects to a DHCP Win2k server box using ipsec. At first I was implementing Samba 2.0.7 as a WINS server and was encountering a problem where 'smbclient -M W2kserver' and 'smbclient -L W2kserver' (where W2kserver is netbios name of w2k box) would give me Win2k side server stats/send message to win2k box, but I could not ping

Hi all. I just upgraded my server from 4.7-Stable to 5.0-Release by a full install. Now I hit a problem with the date.. the time goes much faster than normal.. maybe twice as normal... this morning I found the following kernel log in /var/log/messages May 26 17:23:58 jupiter kernel: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz May 26 17:23:58 jupiter kernel: Timecounter "TSC"

Hi there. OS version: FreeBSD 4.7-Stable FreeBSD #3 I just added a disk to my box and after playing with fdisk and disklabel with this configuration: fdisk: **************************************************************** g c16383 h16 s63 p 1 165 0 39102336 **************************************************************** disklabel

i'm currently running samba 2.2.8a as a domain member server to an NT4Server.... no problems will be upgrading the PDC to a W2K server next week... there isn't a need to use LDAP with Samba with W2KServer is there ? I can still go with my current setup can I ?

Estimados usarios de R: Tengo una base de datos madre en formato .sav de SPSS y la quiero modificar usando datos de otras base de datos .sav y otra en .csv a las que llamare hijos. No tengo problema en convertirlas en data.frame. Todos los archivos tienen en común una variable que es única. En aquellos casos que les falta un valor a una variable en el archivo madre lo relleno con el valor del

Dear All, I carry out negative binomial estimations using the glm.nb command from the MASS package. Is there a command or a simple procedure for computing marginal effects from a glm.nb fitted object? If these are the same as for a Poisson fitted object (glm), my question remains how to compute them. Thanks in advance for your help. Roberto Patuelli ******************** Roberto Patuelli, Ph.D.

Hello everybody My collegue and I noticed a strange behaviour of R on different platforms. It's a simple computation, but results are rather different. On Windows XP: > floor(log(8,2)) [1] 3 which is what one should expect. Here's instead the result with Mac OS X (same version, 2.5.0 (2007-04-23)) > floor(log(8,2)) [1] 2 Is it a "bug" in R or in the operating

Dear All, I would like to analyse the residuals from a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) that I estimated, with random effects, by means of the command glmmPQL, from the MASS package. It is not very clear to me what the actual residuals to analyse are (Y - Yhat): I obtain two columns of residuals, of which the first are population residuals, and the second refer to the grouping used in the

Dear Duncan, Thank you a lot for your feedback. I have a problem though. The branch weights counters overflow in some files and thus I get incorrect numbers. Is there any way to find a workaround for that? Is is supposed to be a known bug or is it something that needs configuration on my part? Again, thank you a lot for your reply. Best Regards, Georgios Zacharopoulos 2016-02-03 18:23

Dear All, I've been using already for a year glm.nb() from the MASS package. But today, R gave me an error message when estimating one of my usual models: > depEsf.nb <- glm.nb(depE ~ manuf00E + corps00E + lngdp00E + lngdp00sqE + > lnpop00E + indshE + scishE + mechshE + elecshE + chemshE + drugshE + > urban_dummyE + aggl_dummyE + + eE1 + eE2 + eE3 + eE4 + eE5 + eE6 + eE7 +

Dear Duncan, I am generating branch-weights annotated IR files as described in the documentation of LLVM, using profiling with instrumentation. http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#profiling-with-instrumentation e.g. llvm-profdata merge -output=$(BENCH).profdata default.profraw > clang -S -emit-llvm -O3 -fprofile-instr-use=$(BENCH).profdata -o > bench.prof.ll bench.c The issue is

Dear ALL, I'm trying to figure out what the percentage effects are in a logistic regression. To be more clear, I'm not interested in the effect on y of a 1-unit increase in x, but on the percentage effect on y of a 1% increase in x (in economics this is also often called an "elasticity"). For example, if my independent variables are in logs, the betas can be directly

Hi list, I could'nt find specific info ion the subject on google, and I'm not sure if the list is appropriated, but, I need to migrate a complete directory-tree from one w2k server to 1st another w2kserver, an then, to a Samba Server (still to be installed). The biggest problem is, if I just copy the directory, I will loose all info over users and permissions. I will also loose the

Dear All, I'm looking to perform an ANOVA between two nested panel fixed effects models. I tried with anova, as well as with waldtest. anova tells me there is no method available for plm objects, while waldtest tells me my models are not nested. I think they are instead. The difference between the two models is that in the second I let the regression coefficients of a given variable variate

Dear Person That Posted This Email, Please be aware that calls for papers are only on-topic for this email list if they are specifically about LLVM. For example, a call for a workshop on LLVM in Scientific Computing would be on topic whereas a general compiler call for papers (like the one below) is not. That said, I hope you receive many strong submissions. Your conference looks

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CALL FOR PAPERS 15th International Conference on Managed Languages & Runtimes (ManLang'18) September 10-14, 2018, Linz, Austria http://ssw.jku.at/manlang18/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ManLang (formerly PPPJ) is a

Call for Participation http://www.hpdc.org/2012/ The organizing committee is delighted to invite you to *HPDC'12*, the /21st International ACM Symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing/, to be held in *Delft, the Netherlands*, which is a historic, picturesque city that is less than one hour away from Amsterdam-Schiphol airport. HPDC <http://www.hpdc.org> is

Call for Participation http://www.hpdc.org/2012/ The organizing committee is delighted to invite you to *HPDC'12*, the /21st International ACM Symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing/, to be held in *Delft, the Netherlands*, which is a historic, picturesque city that is less than one hour away from Amsterdam-Schiphol airport. HPDC <http://www.hpdc.org> is