similar to: Domain admins not getting local admin rights

Hi folks, I am having a weird problem that I just recently noticed on this particular server runnng Samba 3.0.10 on Fedora Core 3 and am hoping someone could shed some light on this. We're using tdb for our backend database. The user "nsu" is a member of unix group admin. The unix group admin is mapped to "Domain Adminstrators". This works OK, in that when logging in

Hi there, Here are the facts: - I have samba 3.4.2-0.42.fc11 running on a Fedora 11 system. - Samba is acting as a domain controller, no Windows server involved. - I am using tdbsam. - I need to enforce certain password requirements. The password requirements are: - min 8 characters - expiration 90 days - last 10 passwords may not be reused - not a dictionary word Per the Samba 3.2 FAQ, the

Deare R users I am new to R. What I want to do is explained below;- I have table called States.Prob which is given below:- This table gives the probabilities of the changes in the swap curve depending on the state of the swap curve. I want to put these probabilities in my dataframe mydata(given after the prob table). Prob of States Changes State1 State2 State3 State4 a

Nothing fancy, and I've done this before... but today I'm trying to get samba 3.10.5 with tdbsam working on Centos 6.3. iptables is stopped on the samba server. selinux is disabled on the samba server. service smb and nmb are running. samba server has an 'a' record on our dns server. samba server is set to be a wins server. Note- I have ANOTHER wins server on the same subnet for

Well, I've asked a couple times already but I will ask one more, since I still havent' managed to get any further. We have several sites. Each site has it's own network and domain. We are connected via a WAN. Is the best practice to have one WINS server for each site? Or is a single WINS server for the WAN the way to go? Right now I have a single WINS server for the WAN. I CAN NOT

Deare R users I am new to R. What I want to do is explained below;- I have table called States.Prob which is given below Prob of States Changes State1 State2 State3 State4 A Pa1 Pa2 Pa3 Pa4 B Pb1 Pb2 Pb3 Pb4 C Pc1 Pc2 Pc3 Pc4 D Pd1 Pd2 Pd3 Pd4 and I have a dataframe called

Anyone seen this before? I have a number of file systems nfs mounted onto clients running various versions of CentOS (and Upstream), although mostly they are v5.x flavors. =20 The server is a Network Appliance filer. When the build process for this team runs, it sometimes dies because it can't find files in the automounter tree; if the engineer checks, he sometimes sees a problem, and

I am yet another person who is having a problem with Win98 clients needing to make several attempts before successfully logging in to our Samba box. I get the "broken pipe" message in the smb.log just like everyone else. This did not seem to be a problem until we got a phat broadband connection. All the Windows boxes are set to point to our ISP's DNS. I am not running DNS on the

Estimado José, por lo que estuve mirando aqui https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilcoxon_signed-rank_test, en ?wilcox.test y en libros de papel ... los datos deben cumplir ciertas condiciones, quiza la mas restrictiva es que sean pareados ... si no lo son, quiza esta variante del test es mas apropiada: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon_test la que en R se aplica usando el mismo

when i trie to log in the domain, the pc says "the local directives in this system dont allow to start an interactiv session" i follow all the step in all the reading that i could find, but nothing works out for me. any help will be useful, thx

hi guys, sorry for this "again" stuff.. but some days ago before i went into a travel i posted some questions here.. but could not find a good answer to solve my problems.. i'll re-write the story so new ppl can help me.. i have a linux box which was my alpha machine, after configuring winbind and samba to log into the nt 2k server i cloned this linux box, so i could be able to

Is there a way to make clients not see "hidden" shares? Like we have an "I:" drive, but it's actually a "Common-Share"... Thoughts? Joel

I am trying to help a friend with a 2850 and snmp monitoring of a controller and its arrays. I don't have any dells, do they have a rpm to make easy work of this for the Percs? They have a monitoring solution already. Any hints I could pass on would be appreciated! Thanks, jlc

Hi folks, I've had a setup working for quite some time and everything's fine except that the server that hosts the WINS never appears in the network neighbourhood, and when trying to connect to that server there is a small delay. As few people need to browse to it, the problem's had a low priority as the WINS side of it is working fine, and the rest of the nethood is also working

--T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Dear R, I would like to report what I think is a bug in R. I am running R within emacs on a Digital AlphaStation. See the version information at the end of my R session for details. I also attach a copy of the file that is read in the `read.table' command. Here's my R session, with a few

Hello, Lots of messages in smbd log file on a Samba file server, which is member of a Samba AD : [2018/07/24 10:30:00.822403, 0] ../source3/smbd/posix_acls.c:2080(create_canon_ace_lists)

I'm having some difficulties setting up browsing across networks and domains and was hoping some of you folks out there could help. We have two domains on two physically separate networks, connected via a firewall/router. To my knowledge the firewall system is not set to block anything between the two segments, just to route them. Network 192.168.18.0, CH domain 192.168.18.14 ch1 (rh7.3, CH

I'm having some difficulties setting up browsing across networks and domains and was hoping some of you folks out there could help. We have two separate domains on two separate networks. I have a single WINS server. Why can I browse both networks from machine pw2 when I can NOT browse both from either ch2 or mtoal (my machine) or from streetsmary? (see details below). Does each network need

Lo que deseamos realizar es una prueba no paramétrica para demostrar que el IMC encontrado difiere significtivamente entre aquellos que tienen a_HTA (entecedentas HTA) y los que no lo tienen ( en SPSS de forma fácil utilizo varios métodos ¿Cuál es la sintaxis para hacerlo posible en R? a_HTA IMC si 26 si 25 si 26 si 21 si 25 si 23 si 28 si 24 si 27 si 22

Hello List, I have tried to grant SeMachineAccountPrivilege to an extra group. Users in this group should not have Admin rights but they should be able to join workstations to the domain. My first try was to grant the right to a single user wich is working as expected. net rpc rights grant "TOPTEST\toptest.r" SeMachineAccountPrivilege -U domainadmin net rpc rights shows: