similar to: ACLs agains :(

Right now, FreeBSD supports one type of ACLs - so called POSIX.1e ACLs. They are natural extension of the traditional Unix permissions, and for a long time were the only nonproprietary ACL type in Unix systems. Times change, and now there are several problems with them: they never actually become standard (the draft they are based on was withdrawn); this results in minor incompatibilities

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13820 Bug ID: 13820 Summary: rsync is not preserving ACLs Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayne at opencoder.net Reporter: dinesh.k at

I hav a problem porting my ACLS from my old filserver to a new one... My old Fileserver: I have my shares on a partition supporting acls with ext3 /dev/md0 on /data/raid type ext3 (rw,acl,user_xattr) My new Fileserver: /dev/md0 on /data/raid type ext4 (rw,acl,user_xattr) Now I copied all my shares to the new Fileserver with rsync and backed up my acls with: getfacl -R

Hi, I recently tried to use ACLs with samba. XFS is running, I can set ACLs using setfacl and read them with getfacl, no problem so far. Samba compiled fine with '--with-acl-support'. Now I set up a share with 'nt acl support = yes', put there a file and added an acl with 'setfacl': root@edjo[ACLTEST]# getfacl datei.txt # file: datei.txt # owner: odenbach # group:

Hello you all, I am trying to set up a samba server with nt acl suport and i am having many troubles, help will be very apreciated. 1 - Is it possible to use acls only with the local users, no domains, no active directory, no winbind resolver (i just wanna work with users and groups that exist in this machine) ? 2 - I couldn't put samba to work, like i wanted (question 1), so i follow a

Hey all, I'm using CentOS 4.4, and want to start doing some work with ACLs (getfacl/setfacl). Unfourtunately, no matter what I do, I get the same error over and over again: setfacl: <filename>: Operation not supported I've tried enabling/disabling the acl and xattr modes on my root partition (the one I'm working on), I've tried moving the file to other

On 2017-04-23 17:19, Henry via samba wrote: > On 2017-04-23 17:01, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 14:07:44 +1000 >> Henry via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >>> Following: >>> >>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs >>> >>> In windows: >>> >>> I

Hi Folks, I am experiencing some problems with samba 3.0.20 which I can not solve on my own. We have updated from samba 3.0.10 to samba 3.0.20, but I am not sure when the problems started. We had a problem with idmap - I had hoped to solve - before. Whenever we rebooted the server, all of the ACLs got jumbled up. I thought that our winbindd_idmap.tdb somehow got broken. I re-created it, but

Ah, yes, oeps sorry, and i did run out of the office yesterday, so didnt see this.. 3000002:rwx 3000003:r-x wbinfo --uid-to-sid=3000003 S-1-5-11 wbinfo --uid-to-sid=3000002 S-1-5-18 wbinfo --sid-to-name=S-1-5-11 NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users 5 wbinfo --sid-to-name=S-1-5-18 NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM 5 Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba

Hi guys, I've got a problem where if I set permissions on a folder(Admin) "setfacl -R -d -m u::rwx,g::wrx,o::- Admin/" and "setfacl -m o:- Admin" I get the following. mail:/data/samba/shared # getfacl Admin/ # file: Admin # owner: BCP+administrator # group: samba user::rwx user:samba:rwx group::rwx group:BCP+admin:r-x mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx

Hello, I currently try to copy a directory locally between two ext4 filesystems while preserving permissions and ACLs using the -aAX options. Under some conditions, rsync does not copy the posix permissions completely, it changes the group::rwx to a group::--- permission. The latest rsync available on Debian Jessie is 3.1.1, but the changelog for 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 did not seem to mention such a bug

Please if anyone has any info... Neil Wilson wrote: > Hi guys, > > I've got a problem where if I set permissions on a folder(Admin) > "setfacl -R -d -m u::rwx,g::wrx,o::- Admin/" and "setfacl -m o:- Admin" > > I get the following. > > mail:/data/samba/shared # getfacl Admin/ > # file: Admin > # owner: BCP+administrator > # group: samba

Hi, I already wrote about this subject last month but didn't get attention... I've found a way to transfert acls with a script and applying them. This process has already been described in this mailing list (http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/2000-March/001992.html) but there's a way to do it in a more efficient way using some getfacl options. You can dump acls of a full

> root at graz-dc-sem.ad.tao.at# wbinfo --sid-to-name=S-1-5-11 > failed to call wbcLookupSid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND > Could not lookup sid S-1-5-11 So how fucked is my domain? On 2017-08-25 08:09, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Ah, yes, oeps sorry, and i did run out of the office yesterday, so didnt see this.. > > 3000002:rwx > 3000003:r-x > > wbinfo

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 1:46:53 AM > Subject: Re: [Samba] ACLs on Samba share not preserved when copying with Windows Explorer > > >> > > Hi Rowland, > > > > This Samba 3 server is joined to a Samba 4 AD domain

Hi. I'm using Samba on FreeBSD to host various file servers. Recently I've noticed one weird thing: samba needs w flag on file for being able to delete it, plus, when 'force user' is used, samba needs additional flags for group owning the file. Not sure if it was there all the time and it's just me, or may be this is an intended behaviour (I hope not), so, anyway I'll

Hi i have a question concerning the acl supoprt of samba, i have a mandrake9 (2.4.19) with a xfs partition installed locally i can get and set acls on the xfs parition snip [root@aclsmb data]# getfacl samba/ # file: samba # owner: root # group: root user::rwx group::r-x other::r-x [root@aclsmb data]# setfacl -m u:smalchow:rwx samba/ [root@aclsmb data]# getfacl samba/ # file: samba # owner:

Look at the acl(5) man page and you'll see that the ACCESS CHECK ALGORITH starts: IF the effective user ID of the process matches the user ID of the file object owner ... ELSE IF the effective user ID of the process matches the qualifier of any entry of type ACL_USER, THEN IF the matching ACL_USER entry and the ACL_MASK entry contain the requested permissions, access is

I removed the vestments of the DC user.map. I had already trying to reset the permissions, following this session: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Shares_with_Windows_ACLs#Troubleshooting When I try to reset the permissions as shown in the bottom page of the ACL Windows page, nothing happens. # ls -l /mnt/data total 20 drwxrwxr-x+ 3 administrator domain admins 4096 Set 30 09:44 NTI

Well, I screwed around a bit and after doing a "wbinfo -u" and a "wbinfo -g" I stopped getting the "unable to map SID" error. Now I'm getting a different error. ;-D [2004/05/25 09:09:34, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(111) unix_mode(FC2-i386-disc1.iso) returning 0744 [2004/05/25 09:09:34, 3] smbd/posix_acls.c:convert_canon_ace_to_posix_perms(2500)