similar to: Plans for BUG 2170 (phantom jobs in queue listing on Windows clients)

Hello good people of Samba, I've been working with the latest Samba (3.0.11pre2) and have noticed that between 3.0.11pre1 and 3.0.11pre2, wbinfo --user-sids <SID> has stopped working. I have confirmed that going back to version 3.0.11pre1 (everything else being held steady) corrects the error I'm seeing. #wbinfo -n <username> <big long SID> #wbinfo --user-sids=<big

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is a preview release of the Samba 3.0.11 code base and is provided for testing only. This release is *not* intended for production servers. However, there have been several bug fixes since 3.0.10 that we feel are important to make available to the Samba community for wider testing. Common bugs fixed in 3.0.11pre2 include: ~ o Inefficiencies

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, i upgraded my server from 3.0.10 to 3.0.11pre2 on friday. today i recognized, that the variable substitution isn't working correctly. my smb.conf file containes the following two lines: include = smb.conf.%G include = smb.conf.%U this was working fine with previous samba versions (up to 3.0.10) the included files contained special shares

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 As promised, here's some quick docs on how to use the privilege model included Samba 3.0.11pre2. http://samba.org/~jerry/Samba-Rights-HOWTO cheers, jerry ===================================================================== Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm) ------- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key -----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is a preview release of the Samba 3.0.11 code base and is provided for testing only. This release is *not* intended for production servers. However, there have been several bug fixes since 3.0.10 that we feel are important to make available to the Samba community for wider testing. Common bugs fixed in 3.0.11pre1 include: ~ o Numerous

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is a preview release of the Samba 3.0.11 code base and is provided for testing only. This release is *not* intended for production servers. However, there have been several bug fixes since 3.0.10 that we feel are important to make available to the Samba community for wider testing. Common bugs fixed in 3.0.11pre1 include: ~ o Numerous

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2170 Bug ID: 2170 Summary: Potential integer overflow Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

Full_Name: Michale Na Li Version: 1.6.0 OS: i386-linux Submission from: (NULL) (140.142.172.141) In src/library/base/man/reshape.Rd, one paranthesis is missing, here is the patch. *** reshape.Rd.old 2002-10-15 23:32:25.000000000 -0700 --- reshape.Rd 2002-10-15 23:32:35.000000000 -0700 *************** *** 12,18 **** idvar = "id", ids = 1:NROW(data), times =

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is a preview release of the Samba 3.0.11 code base and is provided for testing only. This release is *not* intended for production servers. However, there have been several bug fixes since 3.0.10 that we feel are important to make available to the Samba community for wider testing. Common bugs fixed in 3.0.11pre2 include: ~ o Ineffeciencies

nmbd is using a lot of cpu: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 22681 root 20 0 10080 1520 1084 R 99.0 0.3 146:30.78 nmbd log.nmbd logs 30-40 messages per second:: [2008/05/17 12:56:41, 0] nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_registration_request(212) process_name_registration_request: unicast name registration request received for name

Hi, I believe that a value of "result[''status'']" is an integer, isn''t a character string. diff -r 8d41996e6897 tools/python/xen/xend/server/DevController.py --- a/tools/python/xen/xend/server/DevController.py Mon Oct 27 18:51:52 2008 +0000 +++ b/tools/python/xen/xend/server/DevController.py Tue Oct 28 09:14:53 2008 +0900 @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ class

Hi Gang, Running Asterisk 1.4SVN using Polycom 501 phones. Just enabled CallerID and for the most part it works as good as you'd expect anything to from the phone company to. Except: on about 1 out of 10 transfers, instead of getting a callerid of "joe cool <100>" or "abc company <205-555-1212>" I just get "asterisk". Here is what

We have a client that has a single Wildcard TDM400P with 3 FXO ports on Asterisk 1.0.7. Occasionally the system seems to loose its mind and starts originating calls from that Zap channels that don't exist. The receptionist picks up the phone and nobody is there. This can happen repeatedly over and over again within a few minutes. As far as we can tell these are definitely not real calls as

Hi! I have a problem with one box running asterisk, one pots line and an X100P. Almost every night the phones give 2-3 rings and then stop. There are no actual incoming calls, I verified by putting a device that lists the incoming telephone numbers parallell to the X100p and it doesn't list any calls. This is the output on the console for a real incoming call: ? == Spawn extension

I'm getting exactly the same behavior as was posted about in http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2004-March/040380.html I've upgraded (both ends) to CVS stable (CVS-v1-0-06/17/05-13:15:49). Jun 17 13:46:17 NOTICE[15942]: chan_iax2.c:4053 authenticate: No way to send secret to peer 'a.b.c.d' (their methods: 4) Immediately after that, I'll see frames go by with

About once a day I have noticed a phantom incoming call with a caller ID of asterisk@192.168..<cut off>. When I answer the call there is a dial tone and the call is disconnected. Any clues? David Koski david.nospham@kosmosisland.com

Hey all here's an update. I do care to thank everyone for your information on BRI interfaces that operate in USA/NA. I know the responses are were limited, but the selection of hardware is also limited. (Shame because BRI would fit my needs perfectly). To continue, it's now been over 4 weeks since I last talked to the ILEC sales rep about pricing and plans. Unfortunately there

Hi all, I have a client that is having problems with phantom calls. I have not been able to see it happen myself, but they say when it happens, the display on the phone (polycom 301's) says "Device" is calling, but when they answer the phone, there is only silence and then they hang back up and it sometimes rings again. I've been trying to track this down for a couple of

On 7/1/2015 2:02 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > My Update Applet keeps giving me messages to install an update to a > package I do not have installed. To make matters more confusing, when I > actually try to install the package it wants to update, there is a > problem with the installation. > > Any tips on how to resolve this? Is this somehow caused by the > repositories I have

On 7/1/2015 2:35 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > OK, here ya go -- > > Obsoleting Packages > > perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras > perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2.i686 2.021-136.el6_6.1 @updates > perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras > perl-Compress-Zlib.i686 2.021-136.el6_6.1 @updates > perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras >