similar to: Samba authentication slow against PDC

Hi List - I have a friend that runs a Windows domain with Active Directory and is setting up some new laptops with Redhat. He wants to automate installs, etc. on these laptops as he would on a Windows machine. Just wondering if anyone has any experience with this - and also if anyone knows of a good tutorial for joining a Linux machine to a Windows domain. I've heard that it is possible.

Hi everyone ! I just wanna say that I can't configure Samba 3.0.3 to compile with LDAP Support ( --with-ldap ) Here's the log : checking for LDAP support... yes checking ldap.h usability... no checking ldap.h presence... no checking for ldap.h... no checking lber.h usability... no checking lber.h presence... no checking for lber.h... no configure: error: ldap.h is needed for LDAP

I'm at my wits end here so hopefully someone can help me. Currently I have a Redhat 9.0 box running Samba 2.2.7 with openldap 2.0.27 as a PDC Domain logins work great with this setup. I can add, remove, modify computers and users all day long without a glitch. I do not store usernames in the local smbpasswd or passwd files. User information is stored in ou=Users,dc=mydomain,dc=com Group

Hi, I wonder why 2 log files per client (log.$IP and log.$NETBIOSNAME) are created when "log file" ist set to "/var/log/samba/log.%m". I have tested this with Samba 3.0.14a, 3.0.13, 3.0.11, 3.0.10 and 2.2.3a. Samba 2.2.3a was the only release which created only one log file. Is that a bug or is there any sense in saving 2 files with exactly the same content? cheers, karolin

Recently I've seen several suggestions on this list for the enabling of "use sendfile" as a means to improve throughput. I thought this was peculiar since the doc says it is enabled by default. I guess it isn't. On both RHEL4 (Samba v3.0.10) and Fedora Core 4 (Samba v3.0.14) the entry for "use sendfile" in the smb.conf says: Default: use sendfile = yes Hmm.

I have samba set up as primary domain controller, and have problems with my Windows XP SP2 machines. Logging in is quick, but most of the time (nine out of ten times) the logout process takes a long time - I do end up rebooting, but once I let it stay and it took a whole hour before it was logged out. It seems to act the same way for all users. Possible sources already eliminated: - I have

Hi Paul, Regarding the "No Touchie!" constraint idea for asm statements: would this be a new qualifier (like volatile) that could be applied to the asm statement? Since the constraint is not necessarily associated with an input or output operand, it seems that introducing the constraint via the qualifier field might work. All, The volatile qualifier on an asm statement already

The team I am working with is using asm statements containing label definitions as a way of instrumentation so that when an application is loaded into their debug and test framework, the labels will cause breakpoints to be set at strategic points where they can query the state of the processor that the application is running on. ~ Todd From: Eli Friedman [mailto:efriedma at quicinc.com] Sent:

Could this issue also be related to an “AphrontQueryException #1030: Got error 28 from storage engine” error when browsing Phabricator? ~ Todd Snider From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Hubert Tong via llvm-dev Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 9:15 AM To: Mircea Trofin Cc: Nicolai Hähnle via llvm-dev Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [llvm-dev] arc diff says "disk is

I would like to add a target-dependent attribute to the LLVM IR, and the guidance in http://llvm.org/docs/HowToUseAttributes.html says that target-dependent attributes should not occupy a slot in the Attribute::AttrKind enum, but I have yet to find an attribute that is represented in the IR that does not also have a slot in the AttrKind enum. We are limited to 63 slots in the AttrKind enum

*From: *Snider, Todd <t-snider at ti.com> *Date: *Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:53 AM *To: *Rui Ueyama, James Y Knight *Cc: *llvm-dev > > James, Rui, > > > > If we are only talking about addressable hardware registers, peripherals, > etc., then the absolute address symbol is one way to facilitate access to a > symbol associated with a specific address. > > > >

In llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfUnit.cpp, the compiler can emit a DW_AT_calling_convention attribute with a DW_TAG_class_type (and it looks like a DW_TAG_variant_part, DW_TAG_structure_type or DW_TAG_union_type as well), but the DWARF 4 specification says that DW_AT_calling_convention is not a valid attribute for any of those three DWARF tags. Downstream object consumers that check to verify

I have the same question as James has. It seems to me that you can name any address using an absolute symbol, and that should suffice to handle memory-mapped peripherals and such. If you really need to define data (whether it's in .data or .bss) or a function at a fixed memory address, that's not something you can do with absolute symbols (but you can do with linker scripts), but is this

James, What you are doing below is tricking the compiler into believing that it is dealing with a real int object that has actual space allocated to it in x2.o, but sym is not defined as a real data object in x1.o Thanks, but that doesn’t really address my use case. I still contend that associating a placement address with an actual data object (whether it be initialized or not) or function,

Hi Jerry/Samba Team I have Samba 3.0.10 installed on Solaris8 server and Samba-client-2.2.10 installed on Linux Red Hat2.1AS servers The Linux servers use Samba to mount filesystems from Solaris8 server. My question is how to find out on the Solaris8 server which Linux servers are using Samba to mount from. Because it is hideous to go to every Linux server and see which Solaris8 server they are

Hello everybody, I've setup a file server with Debian GNU/Linux (Sarge) and Samba v3.0.10 with ACL, Kerberos etc... so I can join the Windows 2000 domain. I can use users from domain on file server without problems and Windows 2000, XP clients can access Samba shares. But when I try to connect to \\fs from Windows 98 client (in domain) it requests password from me (\\fs\IPC$). I have

> -----Original Message----- > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of > Adrian Prantl via llvm-dev > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 5:20 PM > To: Snider, Todd > Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Potential DWARF debug info bug: DW_TAG_label DIE > has a DW_AT_prototyped attribute > > > > > On Jan 18,

Hi Peter, Thanks for the response. If we set aside the discussion of the relationship between sections and the application of the "location" or "at" attribute for a moment, do you have any objections to the proposed method of encoding metadata information about symbols (whether they are associated with actual data objects, functions, or sections) in the ELF object file?

On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 15:03, Finkel, Hal J. <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > On 5/1/19 7:22 AM, Christof Douma via llvm-dev wrote: > > Hi Snider. > > > > As you and Peter mentioned there are indeed toolchains that allow location placement from within the C/C++ source code, using attributes or similar. I always wonder if such extension is worth the effort. There are

Suppose a programmer wants to inject their own global label definition into the body of a function with some guarantee that it will not be removed by the compiler. One way to do this is to define a global label with an asm statement knowing that the asm statement will not be invoked until after the compiler's optimization passes have run, but the following case demonstrates that a label