similar to: Revisiting SMB and SMP

Several folks on the list have, over time, expressed interest in being able to access the subdomain info inside routes.rb. This was discussed in great detail late last year by several folks: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/2006-January/008114.html In summary, routes can''t access the domain, so your best bet is to stick a before_filter in your application.rb. This

Suppose I create a multiple plot with zoo, using: index <- ISOdatetime(2004, rep(1:2, 5), sample(28, 10), 0, 0, 0) foo <- zoo(rnorm(10), index) for (i in 1:9) { data <- rnorm(10) z1 <- zoo(data, index) foo <- cbind(foo, z1) } plot(foo) This creates 10 plots on one device, one for each column in foo. Now I want to go back and use abline to draw a line at the mean on each of

Le vendredi 26 juillet 2019 à 14:01 +0100, Peter Bowyer a écrit : > Hello, > > I would like to see Xapian used more widely in the PHP community. I would like that too. We recently removed a Xapian searching feature from our Free Software because it required a process too complex for most of our users to install it (and update it) on their servers. [...] > The GPL FAQ says at >

Previously discussed: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-September/msg00203.html Currently libguestfs and virt-v2v require OCaml >= 4.01. (That's perhaps theoretical, as I don't think anyone is really compiling them with such an old compiler). This causes a bunch of trouble. To my mind the major things are: - Having to have the "Bytes" compatibility module

Hey folks, Some months back, I entertained a conversation with Volker Lendecke, Adam Tauno Williams, and Simo Sorce about getting Samba to play nice with LDAP's ppolicy overlay. (Thread starts here: http://www.mail-archive.com/samba@lists.samba.org/msg92134.html and ends here: http://www.mail-archive.com/samba@lists.samba.org/msg92214.html) I was wondering if any progress had been made

We have about 10 citrix servers (WTS 4.0, Citrix 1.8 SP2) that connect up to our file server (Enterprise 3500 Running Solaris 2.6 and Samba 2.0.7). The smb connection to the file server exists as a single smbd process for each citrix server. We belive this is causing a couple of different problems. We've applied the registry "fix" as indicated in the samba digests'.

I''m in the midst of a few new Rails deployments as well as being tasked to revise an existing older deployment to help improve performance. So, I''m wondering what sort of setup is preferable these days for a dedicated server? The basics I''m aiming to start with are the latest CentOS/RHEL, PostgreSQL, Ruby 2.x, Rails and Apache. Is Passenger still the way to go these

Regid, You suggested we remove nut_version.h from the .orig.tar.gz for NUT: <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613643> The original intent was that nut_version.h would be generated from "make dist" (or "make distcheck*") when the official nut-X.Y.Z.tar.gz tarball is created. At that point, it is safe to assume that there is no longer any local version

Since the WEBrick server has been so beefed up in Rails 0.9, I think it''s a darn shame that its lingering outside the support of custom pretty URLs. Also, it seems that the connection between mod_rewrite and url_for and friends is pretty fuzzy for most people. Hence, as we''ve talked about before, the rewriting of the url should be pulled in-house. There has been a few

Waay back at the end of 3.0.3 dev cycle I brought up the issue of XenD running far too many xenstore transactions per-request http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2006-10/msg00487.html Short summary: # nc -U /var/lib/xend/xend-socket GET /xend/domain/test Resulted in approx 16 xenstore transactions for a domain with one disk and one NIC - this increases as # of devices

Hi: I recently encountered a problem reading directories via an XP Pro client shared from a samba server (redhat's rpm samba-2.2.7-5.8.0). File listing was sometimes VERRRY slow. It was not a DNS issue in this case. The symptoms, and my fix is below, but I wanted to ask, is there a way to deal with this from the server? (I dunno- like redirecting port 80 or something). >From the client,

Hello, I would like to see Xapian used more widely in the PHP community. The major obstacle is that binaries of the PHP extension cannot be distributed. I've been reading earlier discussions on this and wonder if there's now an option. My starting points were https://trac.xapian.org/wiki/FAQ/PHP%20Bindings%20Package and the discussion at https://trac.xapian.org/ticket/191. One comment

Hi, I'm in the process of adding support for Markdown to a minimal CMS in Rails, [Railfrog][railfrog], which uses mime types to select appropriate processing. I have had a look through the archives but have not been able to see that a consensus has emerged as to what such a mime type for Markdown should look like. My reading of the RFCs suggests that it should be within the "text/*"

Hi, This sounds like a decent idea to me. However we use 2013 for all our windows builds at the moment and it will take around 2 weeks to upgrade the installations on our cluster. We're pushing this hard to get it done soon so we don't get caught short, but a grace period would be much appreciated. Cheers, James On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 at 21:24 Nico Weber via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at

-----Original Message----- > From: cfe-dev [mailto:cfe-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Aaron > Ballman via cfe-dev > Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2016 12:06 PM > To: David Majnemer > Cc: llvm-dev; cfe-dev > Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Revisiting our informal policy to > support two versions of MSVC > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:24 PM, David Majnemer via

I've finally took the time to figure the last few bugs (that I know of). This patch will be submit to be included in a few weeks. This patch should be generic enough for portable without too much hassle. This patch mimics OpenBSD's ftp behavior. I'm not sure like that (e.g. it doesn't put / at the end of directories by default), but that is more a question for the community

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Mehdi Amini via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Isn’t a big (the most) reason for supporting “old” toolchains to allow > downstream users to upgrade with some flexibility? > If I have a large codebase that is using LLVM (let say a few custom > backends), and is validated with “MSVC 2013”, I can upgrade to “2015” but I > will

I'd like some opinions on a couple of long-standing rsync issues. My two oldest, uncommitted patches are: - A "no hang" patch that makes sure that the pipe from the receiver to the generator can't block with resend requests. - The "move files" patch that got changed into a --delete-sent-files option. For each item I have two questions -- do we need to

As mentioned upthread, we're still on update 2 for various reasons. On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > Hi Reid, first off thanks *very* much for all your help fixing > 2013-related problems. We really appreciate it. > > > > Let me propose a target date of September 15 for advancing the minimum MS > compiler to

Hi, Johannes, Thanks for working on this. This seems like a good approach which nicely extends the set of capabilities we have now. One additional comment, as I agree with everything in your rationale, except this: > - Reconstructing information from the pattern of instructions that feed > into the `llvm.assume` is also not optimal, especially since we do > not need to