similar to: Mini Samba-SuSE Firewall2 HOWTO

Hello! i have some problems with my SuSE 9.2 and the samba ports: if the xp client wants to loggin in samba domain, I get the message at the announcement - usersettings: the servercopy of the serverstored profile was not found. No saving of the changed profile -. After the loggin there are no more problems with the xp client in samba. After googling I collimated the ports in the SuSE

Being a responsible sort of guy, I want to check and make sure I have some decent encryption settings for my authentication systems. Namely Samba PDC (2.2.7a) with an LDAP backend that also authenticates Linux clients (which I've finally gotten running the way I want :-)). According to some documentation I've found, the samba ports are 137/udp,138/udp and 139/tcp. Samba changes

Hello, I have recently had 'Broadband' (Cable) Internet installed in my house and I have setup the my Linux PC to do Network Address Translation for my Windows PC. This system has worked well with the PPP modem, and I know that a full Proxy server would be better, but at the moment I haven't got the time to set one up etc. This setup worked fine: Modem[ppp0

I can not register via sip to iptel or sipgate and do not see sip into ethereal. I do not unterstand why thats Wudu .. but i am new to asterisk and sip. I am behind a susefirewall2 but asterisk even do not register if it is down. The asterisk is running onto the machine witch is connected to the internet. No answer seems coming back from iptel (sip debug in asterisk). Ports are open (5060,

I just tried to set up a tinc test installation, but I guess I did something wrong, because I can only ping one direction. Here's my setup (lan1,192.168.99.0)<-->firewall1<-vpn->firewall2<-->(lan2,192.168.100.0) firewall1 has tap0 on 192.168.88.2 firewall2 has tap0 on 192.168.88.3 i set up the following routes : on firewall1 : 192.168.100.0 gw firewall2(192.168.88.3) on

Hi list, I try to install the following network: /-----------------\ | Firewall 1 | \-----------------/ ___________________| |_________________ | 10.2.6.1 10.2.2.1 | | eth1 | | 10.2.6.11

I have 2 firewall in HA with keepalived. Can I use active the same tinc configuration on 2 firewalls ? using tun Interface with same ip on all 2 nodes is a problem ? tun device advertise itself on the network having an IP/MAC pairs (ARP) or the IP is only used by the system internally for routing so using the same configuration is right ? so one firewall be active, the other is passive. With this

I think it should work at least for TUN virtual interface as TUn works at IP level. This is a sample configuration. firewall1 lan = 172.16.1.11/19 (ALWAYS ACTIVE) - "Physical Network Interface" - system config as ifcfg-... 172.16.1.10/19 (VIP Keepalived Make active) - Active/Passive configuration with firewall2 firewall1 vpndr1

Samba version 3.0.9 on Red Hat 9.0 workstations: NT 4.0 SP6 When I took over this project, there were two domains connected by a VPN. For reasons that I'm unable to understand, some new users wound up with the intended domain of SATA and some wound up in SATB (even though they joined the SATA domain. Recently, all kinds of problems have materialized and the only thing I can find wrong is

Check your FW-1 tracker and see if any sip packets are dropped during call initiation. I had this problem and it went away when I upgraded the BT's firmware to the latest (16). Beware, though, that people on the list claim that this firmware breaks functionality of the message button and autoanswer. I haven't checked this yet, cause I can't afford to go back a version. I prefer a

This is a vpn for Disater Recovery sites, so it is not necessary to have a seamless failover, strictly speaking. Encryption instead is mandatory. Testing we found that on Keepalived failover remote Tinc take few seconds to reset the connection and correctly re-connect to the new active firewall (probably new firewall resetting the connection + PingTimeout + some seconds to reconnect). This is

Hi there, I am trying to setup a configuration that requires me to use SIP and asterisk behind a firewall and over a VPN to a remote office and with some local Phones also. I can't use IAX to my provider because they don't offer it and my handsets ( snom 300 ) also don't support IAX so it's all SIP. The configuration is a follows Asterisk PBX 10.202.17.217/24 ------>|

Greetings! I am still struggling with the issue that after vampiring from NT4 domain to Samba 3.0.7 with ldap backend, Windows XP cannot find the domain controller. In particular, WXP is an XP Prof which signed in AB_INITIO_DOM domain. After the migration I put the Samba Server (Priscilla) and WXP in an isolated network, and started up Priscilla as PDC for the network. But WXP

This is what I want to avoid :D I want an active Tinc virtual interface active with ip identical of the other firewall, without ip conflict on the same network. Do you know if Tun type virtual interface on one host can have same ip address of another host in the same network without ip conflict ? ie if a tun virtual interface can work active without transmitting on real network ? or if such a

Hi Saverio, I found conflict: 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:1b:ba:5e VMware, Inc. 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:2b:12:e6 VMware, Inc. (DUP: 2) 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:2b:12:e6 VMware, Inc. (DUP: 3) 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:2b:12:e6 VMware, Inc. (DUP: 4) 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:2b:12:e6 VMware, Inc. (DUP: 5) So my assumptions were wrong ! :D Probably Virtual

Hi, I have following setup: BT100 ---- Firewall/nat 1 (www.ipcop.org) ---- Internet ----Firewall/nat2 (Vigor) ---- Asterisk . I'd like to use BT100 as local extension to Asterisk. I've done simple setup and BT100 can call Asterisk and place outgoing calls. However I cannot set him to qualify, cause it is claimed as unreachable. I have port redirection at Firewall 1 (to 5060 and rtp

Hello, I am new to samba and i would to well secure it. In smb.conf, I entered the following lines : hosts allow = 192.168.0.2 127.0.0.1 hosts deny = 0.0.0.0/0 bind interfaces only = yes interfaces = eth0 lo I thought that it would only listens on the local machine and my internal Lan (which is on eth0 192.168.0.1) but nmbd seems to always listen on UDP/137 and UDP/138 (netbios-ns and

Hello, I would like to ask you if its possible to run Samba on an other port than 137-139? I tried once to edit the "/etc/services" File. The lines: ... netbios-ns 137/tcp netbios-ns 137/udp netbios-dgm 138/tcp netbios-dgm 138/udp netbios-ssn 139/tcp netbios-ssn 139/udp ... I changed it to: ... netbios-ns 6998/tcp netbios-ns 6998/udp netbios-dgm 6999/tcp netbios-dgm 6999/udp

My clients are Windows XP SP1 and SP2, members of a Samba-PDC NT domain (tested 3.0.7 and 3.0.10, same result). Attached is ethereal output of a two packet client-server exchange that takes place when an offline files sync is done. SP1 quickly does this exchange twice - first broadcast, then unicast (as attached) and goes on its way. SP2 tries, pauses many seconds, tries again, finally

I'm trying to get running an ethernet with two machines: a samba server running suse linux 6.4 and a client running windows 98. I follow the steps in the DIAGNOSIS.txt file, but I get stucked when executing 'net view \\SERVER' in the client. I have laready done everything it says in that file: 1) Set a lmhost file in the client. Just with this line: 192.168.0.1 ASTERIX #Asterix is