similar to: Seeing odd error's on my new Firewall

Hi all, I believe that I have asked this in one form or another, but I did not see an answer. ( it could be that I missed it ) do please forgive me if I did, but could I ask you all to humor me for a moment. Is there any way to get Samba to use YP ( NIS ) as the basis for user authentication? If not at this time ( as I have not been able to determine that it is

List members, I have an issue that I hope one of you can help me with ... I have set up a AD ( 2003 ) as PDC and a RHE3 AS server running Samba V3.0.6-2.3E following the instructions in the HOW-TO- By example. Here is what I have at the moment .. I had no problems adding the RH server to the Domain and I have Winbind set up in the nsswitch.conf file for passwd, group and hosts I

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:28:19 +0100 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > Am 04.03.19 um 21:18 schrieb Mark Foley via samba: > >> It shouldn't, you normally only have one gateway, it is by definition > >> the 'gateway' to the WAN & internet, so I would use the same one on all > >> your machines. > > > > The LAN host

On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 12:58:17 -0500 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 17:18:31 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 11:48:00 -0500 > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 14:50:38 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > > >

On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 11:48:00 -0500 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 14:50:38 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 09:15:12 -0500 > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > I have a rather strange and urgent problem. Last evening I > > > installed a

On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 15:18:31 -0500 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 18:31:07 +0000 From: Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 12:58:17 -0500 > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 17:18:31 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > >

On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 15:57:16 -0500 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 20:43:17 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 15:18:31 -0500 > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 18:31:07 +0000 From: Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > >

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:18:36 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 15:57:16 -0500 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 20:43:17 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 15:18:31 -0500 > > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 17:18:31 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 11:48:00 -0500 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 14:50:38 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 09:15:12 -0500 > > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >

On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 08:39:23 +0100 Peter Milesson wrote: > > On 05.03.2019 7:14, Mark Foley via samba wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 06:17:59 +0100 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > >> Am 05.03.19 um 00:22 schrieb Mark Foley via samba: > >>> /etc/resolv.conf: > >>> nameserver 192.168.0.2 > >>> nameserver 209.18.47.62

Here's a good one for the group, I have 2 Ast servers behind a NAT (Sonicwall :-( ) connecting to the same server outside the NAT. Each of the 2 boxes behind register to the outside server. What I am wondering is, would there be a problem if both servers behind the NAT were listening on port 4569, I realized that the NAT'd port gets changed however I wasn't sure if this would be an

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 18:31:07 +0000 From: Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 12:58:17 -0500 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 17:18:31 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 11:48:00 -0500 > > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 14:50:38 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 09:15:12 -0500 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I have a rather strange and urgent problem. Last evening I installed > > a Sonicwall firewall between the Internet and office LAN. The only > > change that I know of for the LAN workstations was that the

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 20:43:17 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 15:18:31 -0500 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 18:31:07 +0000 From: Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 12:58:17 -0500 > > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >

I have a rather strange and urgent problem. Last evening I installed a Sonicwall firewall between the Internet and office LAN. The only change that I know of for the LAN workstations was that the gateway is now 192.168.0.1 instead of 192.168.0.2. All workstations: Windows, Linux and Mac use DHCP and the AD/DC is the DHCP server, so I wouldn't think that mattered. All Windows workstations work

Hello All, I recently upgraded to Redhat AS3 from an older 7.3 installation. With samba 3 (3.0.2-6.3E is the rpm version), I've been seeing activity that wasn't present before. Every 15 minutes (within a few seconds accuracy), I receive an alert from our SonicWall (firewall appliance) reporting that a "Malformed IP packet dropped." where the source was the upgraded server, and

Enhanced OS. General rules I use: -Do not use SIP transformations (the VOIP tab), these cause random RTP = issues, and once you start forwarding calls between users, all things go = to heck. You are better off using NAT/qualify in your sip.conf. -Do not use SonicOS Standard (all new Sonicwalls should come with = Enhanced now anyway) as there is no method to increase the timeout for = UDP rules,

On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 09:15:12 -0500 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I have a rather strange and urgent problem. Last evening I installed > a Sonicwall firewall between the Internet and office LAN. The only > change that I know of for the LAN workstations was that the gateway > is now 192.168.0.1 instead of 192.168.0.2. All workstations: Windows, >

On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 06:17:59 +0100 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > Am 05.03.19 um 00:22 schrieb Mark Foley via samba: > > /etc/resolv.conf: > > nameserver 192.168.0.2 > > nameserver 209.18.47.62 > > > > /etc/hosts: > > 127.0.0.1 localhost > > 192.168.0.60 ccarter > > > > So, the gateway

There is a SonicWall Pro 2040 to which I successfully established a VPN tunnel under Windows XP using SonicWall VPN client. Now, I'm looking for a way to establish a VPN tunnel to the same SonicWall device under Linux. Installing the SonicWall VPN client under wine 0.9.27 failed ans as far as I understand a posting of 2006 it's doubtful if this type of software will ever be installable