similar to: Cannot share MSAccess DB after upgrade 3.0.5 to 3.0.8

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Cannot share MSAccess DB after upgrade 3.0.5 to 3.0.8"

2005 Sep 08
3
can't update msaccess mdb file
At an account running 3.0.14a Debian (same account as the dual log file issue posted earlier). A user sporadically cannot update an Access mdb file and gets access denied errors. The log: [2005/09/08 12:14:31, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(245) ginny opened file database/EACM & ECC Reports Secure.ldb read=Yes write=Yes (numopen=4) [2005/09/08 12:14:36, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(245) ginny
2006 Jan 04
4
Trying to delay for oplocks twice
We have a lot of [2006/01/04 18:44:40, 0] smbd/open.c:open_file_ntcreate(1355) Trying to delay for oplocks twice in the logs. Do they harm in general? And only in one single case I got this, don't know if I ever will get it reproduced, so maybe not related and happened by accident: Samba version 3.0.21a PID Username Group Machine
2004 Dec 16
0
Re: Cannot share MSAccess DB after upgrade 3.0.5 to 3 .0.8
> -----Original Message----- > From: Lane Beneke [mailto:nolawyersallowed@yahoo.com] > A simple upgrade from 3.0.5 to 3.0.8 broke file > sharing on a MSAccess 2k database (Win2k and WinXP > clients.) There are Paradox databases on the same > file-share that are working fine. The log files show > no errors. I'm about to try increasing the debug > level, but can
2004 Sep 08
1
locked files in smbstatus
hello, can anybody explain or point me to a document that explain the locked files section produced by smbstatus -L (see below). what means denymode ? access ? what means exclusive+batch in the oplock section ? can anybody point me to a document explaining the way file locking works ? regards # smbstatus -L Locked files: Pid DenyMode Access R/W Oplock Name
2005 Oct 31
1
Locking for Linux/WinXP clients (-or- CIFS issues)
Hi... I've been running samba 3.0 for quite some time now (Debian's stable version, currently 3.0.14) and I've had no problems. That's probably been because all my clients were Windows XP boxes. I've now moved several users to Linux (Ubuntu Breezy) as their desktop and I've noticed there seems to be a problem in accessing files across the platforms. If a Linux box
2007 May 02
1
3.0.24 lock not releasing when file is closed
Samba version 3.0.24-4 on a Fedora Core 5 box. I've been working solidly on this for the last 2 days but don't seem to be getting anywhere. Any and all help would be greatly appreciated. I've found that once a file has been opened, smbstatus shows the file is locked as expected (see below) Locked files: Pid Uid DenyMode Access R/W Oplock
2003 May 09
1
Locked files and DOS application
Hello. I have a DOS application which works with database files. The problem is, that Samba doesn't "unlock" the files when DOS app finishes its work. So files stay locked: 27690 DENY_NONE 0x3 RDWR EXCLUSIVE+BATCH /home/samba/FAK/P_RACI03.DBT Fri May 9 13:27:09 2003 27741 DENY_NONE 0x3 RDWR NONE /home/samba/FAK/MATPOD03.DBF Fri May
2013 Jan 09
1
NAS and 2 active Samba servers / locking not working
Hi, I have one NAS which I can access via NFS or Samba. This storage is accessed by 2 linux servers with Samba where I re-export the NAS share. This is sort of an active/active loadbalancing cluster. The only thing not working is locking... If a client opens a Word-File via server1 and another opens the same via server2 it won't inform the user that he can only open the file readonly. I was
2008 Sep 29
1
strang locking behaviour with macosx clients
I'm running a samba pdc on my gentoo box in a mixed environment with a couple of Windows XP clients and only a few MacOSX clients. The users told me, the file locking across the platforms does not work properly sometimes. I tried to google my problem, but without luck. I switched all the flags related the lock mechanism of samba on and off, but the problem seems to be solved yet. The only
2008 May 14
3
[Fwd: File Locking and Permissions Issue]
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: File Locking and Permissions Issue Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 15:10:28 -0700 From: Jack Lauman <jlauman@nwcascades.com> Organization: nwcascades.com To: mailto:samba@lists.samba.org I'm trying to get Lacerte 2007 Tax Accounting software working on a Samba v3.0.28a based server. When one user is logged in it works fine. When two or more users
2003 Mar 07
1
Win2k, Domain logon, permissions
I first asked this question at the end of October, got a response which didn't solve the problem, and have finally got back to the issue now. I'm running 2.2.7a, recently upgraded from 2.2.0 as Domain Logons for Win2K were suspected to be part of my problem. Anyway, the issue relates to AutoCAD (actually a vertical product called Land3) and a command which works with winXX boxes, but
2003 Mar 30
0
why do file locks revert to root ( fairly long)
I help an NT admin that has recently added a redhat 8.0 based samba server to his network. the share is one that is a core service for the operation of the business and has about 50 users constantly accessing data from several accounting and tax preparation applications. One of the primary applications requires update farily recently as of late and the admin is having problems getting all files
2004 Apr 05
1
Two major issues with Mac OS X clients
Hello, I am having to major issues with Mac clients on our samba server. One has to do with how the Mac vs. the PC locks files and the other has to do with a very slow connection to one of our larger shares. 1.) File locking issue: I am having a strange problem occur with shared excel and word files being opened by multiple users. The problem appears to be a result of a Mac opening the file
2007 Aug 13
2
Freebsd + Samba + Ldap + Acls -> No locking file
Hello.. File server freebsd 6.2-STABLE + samba-3.0.25a + ldap + acls Problem: I've a situation where file locking does not seem to be functioning as expected, in that more than one user can open and write to a file without any notifications being displayed about the file already being opened by another user. I have two Windows XP clients accessing the same shared file, user1 has the file
2006 Jun 12
1
smbd -D processes spawn out of control
All, I'm running the latest stable version of SerNet-Samba on a Debian Sarge box (I switched from the traditional Samba package for certain reasons which I won't delve into here), but I've come across a serious issue. Every day, the Samba processes become so numerous that the server begins acting really flaky. That is to say, there are so many smbd -D processes that the server
2006 May 22
1
Samba client file locking
Hello, I am trying to work out the file locking mechanism on our Samba server when connecting from Linux clients. I am getting some strange behaviour in a mixed Linux/Windows environment when multiple clients open/lock the same file for writing. Everything seems fine when a Windows client creates the lock, but if a Linux client creates the lock, we get either two or more Linux clients being able
2007 Jun 22
2
One file open or locked way too many times. How to fix?
A Windows 2000 Server is a member server of the domain. The domain server is CentOS 4.5 with all updates and Samba 3.0.24 built using the packaging/RHEL/makerpms.sh script. The W2k server is opening this file on the samba server. This problem started several versions of CentOS and Samba ago, and I did the upgrades thinking it would fix it. It did not. It seems to be "locking" or
2005 Jan 11
2
Excel "file may have been modified by another user since" with Samba 3.0.10
Hello list, I am encountering a problem with Excel 2003 on Samba shares. If I open an Excel file, edit a cell and then try to save it, I get a dialog box with a "file may have been modified by another user since" message, with the option to save a new copy, or overwrite the current file. Subsequent saves don't exhibit this behaviour, it occurs only on the first save after opening a
2010 Nov 01
1
oplocks failed if user is not the owner of the file?
I have some identical windows 7 clients. All connected to Samba 3.5.4-1.1-2382-SUSE-SL11.0. If I'm the windows-owner of the file, swat shows me under "oplock" "exclusive+batch". Other users get: "none". What is the reason for this? ___________________________________________________________ Neu: WEB.DE De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief! Jetzt
2005 Oct 11
2
problems with samba 3 and termnal server
hello folks dont know if this is a faq: a customer currently uses a Suse 9.2 pro with the last version of Samba to share a folder containing data for an Enterprise Management program (Windows based). everything works fine with local clients (many 98s and 1 XP machine). we have some (15) clients connecting to the ERP program via a Terminal Server (Windows2K server). these clients often stuck