similar to: auth. username rewriting?

Reply to sender Reply to all Reply to folder Forward Move/Copy Delete Read previous item Read next item Get help information on the current window From: McMurtry, Benjamin G. To: 'r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch' Cc: Subject: Table Help Sent: 5/24/2005 4:33 PM Importance: Normal I have a very large table that I want to add some of the certain rows. The table is

Sorry not to have observed etiquet and lurked here for a bit before wading in with a question but I have an issue that may well be because I dont know enough about what asterisk is actually doing under the hood to understand why I cant do what I want with asterisk. Im hoping that someone can point me in the right direction :-) This is what I have: Mandrake 2006 running Asterisk 1.2.3 - no

I''m currently defining nagioscontacts one-by-one like so; @@nagios_contact { username1: ensure => present, use => "generic-contact", contact_name => username1, alias => "user1", email => "emailaddress1", target => "/etc/nagios/conf.d/contacts/username1.cfg",

Many git commits in the monorepo look like the following: [Tag0][Tag1] Title line Summary: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quisque mauris neque, porta nec tristique at, sagittis vel nisi. Fusce pharetra nunc et mauris consequat venenatis. Reviewers: username0, username1 Reviewed By: username0 Subscribers: username2, username3,

Hi, I have a DC on samba 4.17.12 I want store sudoers in LDAP, and use sssd for get rules from LDAP. I was configured sssd.conf [sssd] config_file_version = 2 services = nss, pam, sudo user = _sssd domains = TEST.ALT [nss] [sudo] [pam] [domain/TEST.TLD] dyndns_update = true id_provider = ad auth_provider = ad chpass_provider = ad access_provider = ad default_shell = /bin/bash

On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 13:30:13 +0500 Anton Shevtsov via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a DC on samba 4.17.12 > > I want store sudoers in LDAP, and use sssd for get rules from LDAP. > > I was configured sssd.conf > > [sssd] > config_file_version = 2 > services = nss, pam, sudo > user = _sssd > domains = TEST.ALT > >

24.11.2023 14:57, Rowland Penny via samba ?????: > On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 13:30:13 +0500 > Anton Shevtsov via samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have a DC on samba 4.17.12 >> >> I want store sudoers in LDAP, and use sssd for get rules from LDAP. >> >> I was configured sssd.conf >> >> [sssd] >>

i setup a RedHat server with samba/kerberos/winbind. I can retrieve my user and groups with wbinfo -u and wbinfo -g. BUT in the listings, the name appears like that : wbinfo -u DOMAIN+username1 DOMAIN+username2 DOMAIN+username3 DOMAIN+username4 If i try to authenticate a user with wbinfo -a username1%password i've got this error : plaintext password authentication failed error code was

>> As per my post: checkpassword. You can then use one password on Mondays, >> Wednesdays, and Fridays, alternate passwords on Tuesdays and Thursday >> fetched from a rot-13 database, and only from prime numbered IP addresses >> on weekends, if that's what you want. > > Having read the wiki page on checkpassword, I am unsure how this would > work with an ldap

"mourik jan c heupink" <lists at merit.unu.edu> writes: > On 07/24/2017 04:51 AM, Joseph Tam wrote:> You are essentially writing your own backend by taking over >> authentication. You'll be accepting user/password inputs into your >> checkpassword executable, then use the LDAP API (or some other system...snip >> and source address, which will be

It appears that you cannot include groups from trusted domains in the 'valid users =' directive on a share. Here is the scenario as I experienced it (names have been changed to protect the innocent): Configuration: - Samba 3.0.21b as a member server in a real NT4 domain (security = domain) called 'NTDOMAIN' - NTDOMAIN has a two-way trust with Windows 2003 Active Directory

I also find the "Reviewed by" tag useful (as well as the review link), for the same reasons. In fact, I don't even use arcanist to push commits, so I do it all by hand, and only include the "Reviewed by" and "Differential Revision" tags. On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 at 20:55, David Blaikie via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I don't think

Can we fix this in reviews.llvm.org's fork of phab? https://github.com/phacility/phabricator/blob/cac3dc4983c3671ba4ec841aac8efac10744a80c/src/applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialGetCommitMessageConduitAPIMethod.php Seems straightforward(-ish) to drop the relevant fields there, that way `arc land` automatically DTRT. Jon On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 11:30 PM Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev

This problem was already described on a very similar way in Oct 2004 on the following message: [http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-October/094683.html] As no solution was found so far, I am re-posting it on the hope that somebody can help. ================================================= Situation: - A windows2000 domain with active directory up and running. - A Samba server with

The limitation with the "Reviewed by" line is that if you just use `arc` it indicates who was added as reviewer on the revision, but not who approved it. Because of this, I am wary of relying on this line for anything. If you want to know who reviewed a change, better click on the Differential Revision link and go to the source of truth. -- Mehdi On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 10:44 AM

Hi I've 3 iax connections to my provider , each of them have own DID , PH1<----| | \/ PH2<-->|-----| <---------------------------> |----|<-- DID1 | A1 | <---------------------------> |ISP |<-- DID2 PH3<-->|-----| <---------------------------> |----|<-- DID3 I had iax phone on each of this connection , but now I want to terminate all

I'm sure I've seen many commits with both "Reviewed by:" and "Reviewers:" tags, which look to have been done with arc (though I can't be sure). How were those generated? On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 at 19:12, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, I tend to prune it down myself - and if the list has only one name > on it, it's usually a pretty

Hi All, I am trying to configure asterisk to receive an inbound SIP connection and send it to a specified context. Instead of sending the call the specified context, asterisk is using the context default from [general]? Any thoughts? I am sure that it is something simple I am missing. To recap, it is sending calls to the context default, not thecontext... [general] context=default

Hi all, Our domain is running perfectly, but for the fun of it, I tried a samba-tool dbcheck, and (unexpected actually!) it returned many errors, on many users, like this: > ERROR: wrongly formatted userParameters on CN=username1,CN=Users,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com, should not be psudo-UTF8 encoded > Not changing userParameters from UTF8 encoding on

I think there's a good chance that upgrading both will fix it. The bug already existed in old versions, it just wasn't normally triggered. Since v2.3.8 this situation is triggered on one dsync side, so the v2.3.9 fix needs to be on the other side. > On 5. Dec 2019, at 8.34, Piper Andreas via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > upgrading to 2.3.9