similar to: XP NTBackup Inconsistency - du under-reports vs file size

Hi List, I have a very strange problem with NTBACKUP writing to a SAMBA share. NTBACKUP won't write files bigger than 4.29GB to a SAMBA share. Here are the specs of the systems: SAMBA Server: Slackware 10.1 SAMBA 3.0.21a (large file support turned on) Kernel 2.6.8 / ReiserFS Windows Server: Windows 2003 Server NTBACKUP (latest version) Data to backup is about 50GB

Hi all, I'm experiencing a problem when NTBACKING'UP my W2000 Server files against a Linux 2.4.9 + ReiserFS 3.6 file system + Samba share. It works OK for the first 4 Gb's around file size. Then ntbackup stops serving data and the file on the samba side appears to be downsized to 0 and growing ssssslowly. Once you stop ntbackup by killing the process, the file reappears at its real

Hello. We are having a really strange problem and I have been searching the net all day for a answer. We are trying to restore files from NTBackup to a Samba share using alternate pathing in ntbackup. The samba machine is a Solaris 8 machine with Samba 3.0.3 beeing a member of out AD domain. We map the samba share to Y:\ on the XP machine using a named account in AD, with a local

Hi all I noticed that 3.0.7 is out (another security release)... does this contain the fixes for NtBackup connecting to a share? Currently I have to use ftp to copy the data to the server before backing up... not ideal. Thanks in advance ? Tom Hibbert ??? Technical Specialist ? Phone: +64-9-306-0230 Technical Helpdesk: +64-9-306-0234 Mobile: +64-274-307-784 Email: tom@nsp.co.nz Website:

Hi I have a Linux/XFS/Samba that Windows Domain users access through client machines either by UNC or mapped drive. I am trying to work out a backup plan. I would like to use ntbackup to achieve this with Normal (once) and Differential (daily) backups. However, when I run the normal backup the archive checkbox does not get cleared so the differential backup backs up everything again. I have

Hi all, I have a problem with using NTBackup with SAMBA shares. I know about bug in version 3.0.x. I have SAMBA 1.9.18 at the moment on AIX machine and two Windows2003 Server. While trying to select SAMBA shares for backup I have "Access to this device or folder has been denied" error. This problem appears only on Win2003Srv. When I tried it on Win2kSrv with exactly the same

Hi all, I experienced the same problem with 3.0.4 that Jeremy and Bruno were discussing - NTBackup unable being to connect to shares and erroring out with 'Access Denied'. I have today upgraded to 3.0.5 (using the Debian Woody packages) and that didn't fix the problem. Was the fix in 3.0.5r1 only applicable to 2000/2003 server? I am stuck in the dark ages of NT 4 here, maybe that is a

Hello find /etc -size -1G should return all files less than 1Giga byte in /etc, but return a list of empty file (size=0) find /etc -size -2G work fine and return all the files This works the same on my fedora11 and my centos 5 ! Did I miss something or is it a bug ? Regards -- Alain Spineux | aspineux gmail com Your email 100% available |

Here is a P2V challenge I could use some advice with. I have a source Windows 2003 physical machine that was upgraded several years ago from Windows 2000. So its system is at C:\WINNT instead of C:\Windows. The target is a RHEV VM. Booting the source machine from the virt-p2v CD and trying virt-p2v-server fails apparently because the Windows directory is c:\WINNT. What about the

> This problem was occurring on 19p8 so I moved to samba 2.0.0 yesterday in > hopes it was a bug > that had been solved... All the information I am supplying relates to > version 2.0.0. The only change > I made to my global.conf file between the two versions was to remove the > socket option IPTOS_THROUGHPUT. > > We have a large number of zip files named

Hi All, I have been having problems with the known issue on 3.0.4 with NTBackup and a DFS related issue. Therefore I decided to give 3.0.5rc1 a go, as SuSE have released the rpms on their website. Once I installed the rpms, I found that all daemons started correctly, but all domain authentication failed (I am running a samba server as a member server against a Windows 2000 mixed mode domain).

I'm reposting this problem (perhaps a bug) now I've got more information on it. This is another point of view of the situation and I hope someone could have run into the same trouble before (and solved it :-)) This is it: * with ntbackup 2000 I create a 22Gb .bkf file in the windows machine. * I can copy that file over a samba share and get correct info form the file in windows

On Feb 7, 2008 4:31 PM, ankush grover <ankushcentos at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Friends, > > > I am running samba as domain member of AD 2k3 on Centos 4.4 . Quota of > 2GB is set for each user but for one of the user quota or edquota is > showing wrong blocks even though disk space occupied by that user is > 809M. > > > quota bhavesh.kumar > Disk quotas for

Hi Friends, I am running samba as domain member of AD 2k3 on Centos 4.4 . Quota of 2GB is set for each user but for 2-3 uers quota or edquota is showing wrong blocks even though disk space occupied by that user is very less than the quota specified for ex 810 MB. quota bhavesh.kumar Disk quotas for user bhavesh.kumar (uid 11254): Filesystem blocks quota limit grace files quota

>> If you're looking to share the tape drive so you ................ >You could probably do something clever with a magic >script in the Samba config, but it still wouldn't >work with native Windows backup utilities. (Are >there native Windows backup utilities that can >access a remote tape drive?) You could probably get >it to work with tar under Cygwin if

This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --27464147-1557463723-1147085467=:8118 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Mon, 8 May 2006, x.sole at iconcologia.net wrote: > Full_Name: Xavier Sol? > Version: 2.3.0 > OS: Windows

On 10/20/18 7:42 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > I would like to hear the reasons of those who chose to use Fedora on their > server. Specifically what advantages one has found compared to other > alternatives. And also what kind of server that is. Single > user/home/family one? Serving some department or similar (say 100 people, > who may need services 24/7/365)? I know, this is just

Hello, I need to copy a huge amount of files and directories from a file server running Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP4 to a file server running Gentoo Linux 2005.1 and Samba-3.0.14a compiled with acl, winbind, Kerberos and LDAP support. Both machines are members of an Active Directory domain. The data to copy reside on NTFS filesystem and have a complex ACL and ownership structure which

We are migrating an LTO2 library off Veritas and NTBackup on a Windows Server to a Linux Server with either Bacula or Amanda. Originally, the Windows server used scripts to sync changes from various other Windows servers using Robocopy to a locally attached set of volumes, then ran the backup nightly (Full's were always done). I now had hoped to rsync the Samba shares to a local replica on

On Sat, October 20, 2018 8:23 am, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 05:52:12PM -0700, Japheth Cleaver wrote: >> The wider EL community is trapped between a rock and a hard place >> somewhat. If you try to direct Fedora into the needs of EL users, >> you stand a good chance of getting told to pound stand, and that EL >> is getting in the way of bleeding-edge