similar to: Fwd: Problems with samba under FreeBSD, not under Linux

Dear All, (Context: Office windows LAN; PC Pentium 3 with 128 MB, FreeBSD 5.3.) Here you are the unanswered message I sent to the FreeBSD mailing list: \BEGIN{MESSAGE} -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- After installing and launching samba 3.0.7 daemons under my postgresql FBSD5.3 stable server at office, I'm having trouble in connecting

Thanks all for helping with this and for script Still no luck though. I've modified scripts as they had some bugs, my output and modified version at the end. As I mentioned, I don't have any issues with joining samba 4.1 or 4.2 in the lab, only on that site. >> if so, try the following. >> in resolv.conf, add >> search mynat.myco.bcu myco.bcu I haven't tried

On 08/06/15 13:08, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > Hai, > > After reading all below i can only conclude this must be firewalling, as Rowland is saying also. > > check if all of these ports are acceccable for the server your trying to join. > > tcp 0 0 192.168.X.1:1024 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 2146/samba > tcp 0 0 192.168.X.1:135 0.0.0.0:*

Thanks Rowland. I understand smb.conf is bit messy and can affect performance but it should not prevent me from joining domain. Here you go: [global] workgroup = MYNAT realm = MYNAT.MYCO.BCU server string = My server %h security = ADS password server = dc1001.mynat.myco.bcu map to guest = Bad User obey pam restrictions = Yes pam

On 03/06/15 22:04, ivenhov wrote: > Thanks Rowland. > I understand smb.conf is bit messy and can affect performance but it should > not prevent me from joining domain. > > Here you go: > > [global] > workgroup = MYNAT > realm = MYNAT.MYCO.BCU > server string = My server %h > security = ADS > password server =

Hai, After reading all below i can only conclude this must be firewalling, as Rowland is saying also. check if all of these ports are acceccable for the server your trying to join. tcp 0 0 192.168.X.1:1024 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 2146/samba tcp 0 0 192.168.X.1:135 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 2146/samba tcp 0 0 192.168.X.1:139

trellis.device(bg="white", color=F) before your call to splom could make what you want but take also a look at ?trellis.par.set Stefano > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: v.demartino2 at virgilio.it [mailto:v.demartino2 at virgilio.it] > Inviato: mercoled? 3 marzo 2004 12.10 > A: r-help > Oggetto: [R] Changing background in splom et al. > > > Context:

I reproduced error WERR_DEFAULT_JOIN_REQUIRED in two scenarios: - user account that is used to join machine to domain is not part of Domain Admin group. - OU path for computer (specified in createcomputer) is invalid In both of those cases I'm getting detailed error messages: 'insufficient access' and 'invalid path' respectively but on customer site I'm always getting:

On 03/06/15 21:29, ivenhov wrote: > I reproduced error WERR_DEFAULT_JOIN_REQUIRED in two scenarios: > - user account that is used to join machine to domain is not part of Domain > Admin group. > - OU path for computer (specified in createcomputer) is invalid > > In both of those cases I'm getting detailed error messages: 'insufficient > access' and 'invalid

I've made all changes to 3 files you mentioned, also removed everything except localhost in hosts file. SO I have minimal smb.conf and minimal krb5 file Unfortunately error is still the same. If I try to join with full OU path I get kerberos_kinit_password testuser at MYNAT.MYCO.BCU failed: Cannot contact any KDC for requested realm libnet_Join: libnet_JoinCtx: struct libnet_JoinCtx

On 03/06/15 23:54, ivenhov wrote: > I've made all changes to 3 files you mentioned, also removed everything > except localhost in hosts file. > SO I have minimal smb.conf and minimal krb5 file > > Unfortunately error is still the same. > > If I try to join with full OU path I get kerberos_kinit_password > testuser at MYNAT.MYCO.BCU failed: Cannot contact any KDC for

I 'm using potfix-dovcote as an internal mail server(local.myco.com) and wan to run another potfix-dovcote as an external mail server (myco.com) on Internet.75% of my users should only work internally(no external mail) but the rest of users (25%)should be able to send mail to external network! These users have the same username on myco.com. I use smtp_generic_maps to map int username of these

I know 5.1 isn't considered part of -stable, but it doesn't really seem like -current either, so I'm asking here. If this is the wrong place please let me know where I should be. At work I have a 5.1-R box that I'm trying to use to mount shares from a Sun box running samba 2.2.0 as well as some Win2K boxes. Both the sun and win2k machines authenticate to the company's domain

On 2/24/2020 12:47 AM, TomK via samba wrote: > On 2/23/2020 2:54 PM, TomK via samba wrote: >> On 2/23/2020 11:44 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 23/02/2020 16:05, TomK wrote: >>>> On 2/21/2020 9:18 PM, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 20:48 -0500, TomK wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>

On 2/23/2020 2:54 PM, TomK via samba wrote: > On 2/23/2020 11:44 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 23/02/2020 16:05, TomK wrote: >>> On 2/21/2020 9:18 PM, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >>>> On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 20:48 -0500, TomK wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Sadly this really appears

Hi folks, I have been asked to force NTLMv2 logins to avoid use of LM hashes. To meet the requirement I added some lines to the smb.conf in [Global] (we only have that section anyway - this is purely for domain authentication with an ldap backend): client lanman auth = no client NTLMv2 auth = yes lanman auth = no min protocol = LANMAN2 ntlm auth = no This seemed to work - users

When I use mount_smbfs I receive such message: # mount_smbfs -W sbrc -U Kid -E koi8-r:cp1251 -Iradius.sbrc.local //Kid@radius/MUSIC$ /home/anonftp/.2 mount_smbfs: can't get server address `radius.sbrc.local': Resolver Error 0 (no error) mount_smbfs: can't get server address: syserr = Network is down Network is up in fact, dns server resolves name, but I receive this message

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 4:29 AM, Peter Serbe <peter at serbe.ch> wrote: > If the domain is set up as > [global] > workgroup = LOCAL > realm = local.thisismycompany.com > then the domain users would log in as local\flast. > I am not sure, whether LOCAL makes up a good domain name... Thanks for adding clarity Peter. I'm having trouble framing my questions so

Anyone know if mount_smbfs is broken in 6.1, I'm trying to run this: "mount_smbfs -I 192.168.1.2 //nbritton@192.168.1.2/music2 /mnt/network/music/" And then it asks for my password, I type it in, and then I get this error: "mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Authentication error" I've had this same problem on another 6.1 box too... I can run this same

I have sucessfully installed samba 2.2.8a from the port collection, and when using my windows machine I can browse shares I defines in my smb.conf perfectly. However when I try to mount the windows share from freebsd I get the following mount_smbfs -I 198.168.1.3 //mick@198.168.1.3/C$ /mnt/2k Password: mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Connection reset by peer However the