similar to: share names longer than 12 characters

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "share names longer than 12 characters"

2017 Jun 01
3
[RFC] Making -mcpu=generic the default for ARM armv7a and arm8a rather than -mcpu=cortex-a8 or -mcpu=cortex-a53
Thanks for everyone giving their feedback! I saw pretty unanimous support for making -mcpu=generic the default and making -mcpu=generic schedule for an in-order CPU (Cortex-A8 in this case). I'll be making those changes shortly. I think the comments also make clear that it's less obvious whether we'd want -mcpu=native to become a default. It's probably good for some use cases, but
2017 May 25
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
Hi Kristof, > On May 25, 2017, at 2:09 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com> wrote: > >> >> On 24 May 2017, at 22:01, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com <mailto:qcolombet at apple.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Kristof, >> >> Thanks for going back so fast! >> >>> On May 24, 2017, at 12:57 PM, Kristof Beyls
2017 May 24
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
Hi Kristof, Thanks for going back so fast! > On May 24, 2017, at 12:57 PM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com> wrote: > >> >> On 24 May 2017, at 19:31, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com <mailto:qcolombet at apple.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Kristof, >> >> Thanks for the measurements. >> >>> On May 24, 2017, at
2017 May 29
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
Thanks Quentin, it's in progress now, I'll let you know how it goes. Cheers, Diana On 27 May 2017 at 03:36, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Kristof, > > I’ve pushed the localizer in r304051 and added it in the AArch64 O0 pipeline > in r304052. > > I let Diana investigate the seg fault she was seeing. > > @Diana, let me know if you need
2017 May 31
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
Cool test :) It seems to work fine now, I don't see any new failures. IIUC, Kristof is also giving it another run. Cheers, Diana On 30 May 2017 at 22:57, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Diana, > > I’ve actually gone ahead and pushed the fix as I was able to produce a > small reproducer. > > This is r304244 > > Let me know if you encounter
2017 May 30
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
Thanks Diana. That is indeed the assumption in the code and this is obviously wrong. Could you try the attached patch? (I haven’t even tried to compile it though) Cheers, -Quentin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: localizer_tentative_fix.diff Type: application/octet-stream Size: 774 bytes Desc: not available URL:
2017 May 24
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
Hi Kristof, Thanks for the measurements. > On May 24, 2017, at 6:00 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com> wrote: > >> >> On 23 May 2017, at 21:48, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com <mailto:qcolombet at apple.com>> wrote: >> >> Great! >> I thought I had to look at our pipeline at O0 to make sure optimized regalloc was
2017 Dec 18
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
Hi Amara, My reasons for preferring the switch to happen after the release branch is based on the following observations: * As far as I can see, the projects and products following top-of-trunk tend to test much more extensively than the testing that happens for llvm.org<http://llvm.org> releases. I expect that the llvm.org<http://llvm.org> release testing won’t find potential
2017 Dec 18
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
FYI all: the patch to enable it is available to review here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41362 Thanks, Amara > On Dec 18, 2017, at 5:44 PM, Amara Emerson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Ok. We’ll look at what we can do to further stress test it in the next two months, additional suggestions from the community is welcome. Patch should be incoming to enable it
2017 Apr 26
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
Hi Kristof, > On Apr 6, 2017, at 6:53 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com> wrote: > > I've been digging a little bit deeper into the biggest performance regressions I've observed. > > What I've observed so far is: > * A lot of the biggest regressions are caused by unnecessarily moving floating point values through general purpose registers. I've
2017 Apr 27
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
Hi Kristof, > On Apr 27, 2017, at 9:47 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com> wrote: > > Hi Quentin, > >> On 27 Apr 2017, at 00:48, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com <mailto:qcolombet at apple.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Kristof, >> >>> On Apr 6, 2017, at 6:53 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com
2018 Jan 02
0
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
Unless there are still open issues with your patch, or our internal bots point to problems, I think time has come to flip the switch. Thanks Gerolf > On Dec 18, 2017, at 11:14 AM, Amara Emerson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > FYI all: the patch to enable it is available to review here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41362 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D41362>
2017 Apr 06
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 6:53 AM, Kristof Beyls via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I've been digging a little bit deeper into the biggest performance > regressions I've observed. > > What I've observed so far is: > * A lot of the biggest regressions are caused by unnecessarily moving > floating point values through general purpose registers.
2017 May 09
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
Hi Quentin, On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 11:47 AM Quentin Colombet via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Kristof, > > On May 9, 2017, at 3:41 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com> wrote: > > Great Quentin :). > > I've rerun the benchmarks comparing "-O0 -g" with "-O0 -g -mllvm > -global-isel -mllvm
2017 Nov 14
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
On 13 Nov 2017, at 18:26, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com<mailto:qcolombet at apple.com>> wrote: Hi Kristof, On Nov 13, 2017, at 9:10 AM, Kristof Beyls <Kristof.Beyls at arm.com<mailto:Kristof.Beyls at arm.com>> wrote: Hi Quentin, My only remaining concern is around ABI compatibility. The following commit seems to indicate that in the previous round of
2017 Dec 18
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
On 18 Dec 2017, at 15:11, Amara Emerson <aemerson at apple.com<mailto:aemerson at apple.com>> wrote: On Dec 18, 2017, at 12:37 PM, Kristof Beyls <Kristof.Beyls at arm.com<mailto:Kristof.Beyls at arm.com>> wrote: Hi Amara, My reasons for preferring the switch to happen after the release branch is based on the following observations: * As far as I can see, the
2017 May 09
4
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
Great Quentin :). I've rerun the benchmarks comparing "-O0 -g" with "-O0 -g -mllvm -global-isel -mllvm -global-isel-abort=2" on r302453, on AArch64 Cortex-A57. I indeed see almost no moves between GPR and FPR registers anymore (see details below for where I still see some). On geomean, I see 13% slow down (down from 17% on my previous run). On geomean, code size increase
2015 May 20
2
[LLVMdev] Proposal: change LNT’s regression detection algorithm and how it is used to reduce false positives
I agree. Fixed in r237748. > On May 18, 2015, at 9:39 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com> wrote: > > BTW – graphs like the one in attachment make me think that the LNT webUI should be showing > sample points by default instead of line graphs showing the minimum execution time > per build number. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
2016 Apr 19
2
RFC: LNT/Test-suite support for custom metrics and test parameterization
Hi Elena, This is great, I would love to see extensible support for arbitrary metrics. On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Kristof Beyls <Kristof.Beyls at arm.com> wrote: > Hi Elena, > > Many thanks for working on this! > > May I first suggest to convert the google document to email content? That > may make it a little bit easier for more people to review. It also makes
2017 May 23
2
[GlobalISel][AArch64] Toward flipping the switch for O0: Please give it a try!
Great! I thought I had to look at our pipeline at O0 to make sure optimized regalloc was supported (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33022 <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33022> in mind). Glad I was wrong, it saves me some time. > On May 22, 2017, at 12:51 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com> wrote: > > >> On 22 May 2017, at 09:09, Diana Picus